Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Insight into Acquired Brain Injury pp 73–91Cite as

The Body-Subject Perspective of ABI—A Literature Review of Qualitative Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 603 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Prate—to talk foolishly or at length about something.

  2. 2.

    The more recent literature will be explored further in the discussion chapter later and any new findings interpolated with the recommendations for practice.

References

  • Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48(8), 977–988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress and coping. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. (2010). Narratives and people with learning disabilities. In G. Grant, P. Ramcharan, M. Flynn & M. Richardson (Eds.), Learning disability: A lifecycle approach (pp. 7–19). Maidenhead: Open University Press and MacGraw-Hill Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birman, D. (2005). Ethical issues in research with immigrants and refugees. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 155–177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darragh, A. R., Sample, P. L., & Krieger, S. R. (2001). ‘Tears in my eyes ‘cause somebody finally understood’: Client perceptions of practitioners following brain injury. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(2), 191–199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, P. P., & Straus, C. (2009). Hidden battles on unseen fronts: Stories of American soldiers with traumatic brain injury and PTSD. Philadelphia, PA: Casemate Publishers and Book Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, C. (1997). Doing up buttons. Ringwood, Australia: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, C. (2014). Unlocking my brain through the labyrinth of acquired brain injury. Sydney, Australia: Ventura Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J., Chenoweth, L., & McAuliffe, D. (2006). Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: A new and accessible method. Brain Injury, 20(12), 1283–1294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. B., & Ragsdale, K. (2005). Goodness-of-fit ethics for multicultural research. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 3–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H., & MacDougall, C. (2016) Doing narrative feminist research: Intersections and challenges. Qualitative Social Work, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: towards an interpretation theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelech, J. M., & Desjardins, M. (2011). I am many: The reconstruction of self following acquired brain injury. Qualitative Health Research, 21(1), 62–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1985a). Phenomenological psychology of learning and verbal tradition. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 23–85). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1985b). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 1–21). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological approach in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, H., Benton, D., & Edwards, S. (2004). Women’s experience of brain injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology & Health, 20, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, H., Edwards, S., & Benton, D. (2005). Male body image following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 19(2), 135–147. doi:10.1080/02699050410001720077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratne, T. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85–106). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumisko, E., Lexell, J., & Söderberg, S. (2007). Living with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury: The meaning of family members’ experience. Journal of Family Nursing, 13(3), 353–369. doi:10.1177/1074840707303842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jumisko, E., Lexell, J., & Söderberg, S. (2009). The meaning of feeling well in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(16), 2273–2281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karpman, T., Wolfe, S., & Vargo, W. J. (1986). The psychological adjustment of adult clients and their parents following closed head injury. The Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counselling, 17, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, E., & Muenchberger, H. (2009). When systems hurt rather than heal: Outcomes following psychological injury at work. In C. Marshall, E, Kendall, R. Gover & M. Banks (Eds.), Disability: Insights from across fields and around the world (Vol. 3, pp. 145–154). Westport, CT: Praeger Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, E., & Terry, D. J. (2008). Understanding adjustment following traumatic brain injury: Is the Goodness-of-Fit coping hypothesis useful? Social Science and Medicine, 67(8), 1217–1224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskowski, T. (2003). Every good boy does fine. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, L. E., & Widucki, L. (1988). Susan’s dad: A child’s story of head injury. Emeryville, CA: Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levack, W. M. M., Kayes, N. M., & Fadyl, J. K. (2010). Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(12), 986–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levack, W., McPherson, K., & McNaughton, H. (2004). Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: Are we evaluating what is most important? Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(5), 290–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linde, C. (1993). Life Stories: The creation of coherence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linge, F. R. (1990). Faith, hope and love: non traditional therapy in recovering from serious head injury: A personal account. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 116–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, V., Gatherer, A., & Kals, S. (2006). Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1386–1404. doi:10.1177/1049732306293846

  • Lorenz, L. S. (2010a). Discovering a new identity after brain injury. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(6), 862–879. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, L. S. (2010b). Brain injury survivors: Narratives of rehabilitation and healing. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner (not sure which of these refs are relevant)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. A. (2009). Disabilities: Insights from across fields and around the world. Westport, CN: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. P. (2008). Head cases: Stories of brain injury and its aftermath. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • McColl, M. A., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., Davies, D., et al. (1998). The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12(1), 15–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 117–139). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. London, England: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, G., & Van der Loo, J. (1986). My friend Lucy. Markham, Canada: Scholastic TAB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nochi, M. (2000). Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Social Science and Medicine, 51(12), 1795–1804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, J. D. (2004). Interpreting the meaning individuals ascribe to returning to work after traumatic brain injury: A qualitative approach. Brain Injury, 18(9), 941–955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, V. S. (2005). The get well soon…Balloon!.Wake Forest, NC: Lash & Associates Publishing/Training Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, E. (2000). The politicization of ethical knowledge: Feminist ethics as a basis for home care nursing research. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 3(3), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, R. J. (2011). Out of calamity—Stories of trauma survivors. Stepney, Australia: Axiom Australia Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M., & Lee, R. M. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. M., & Webber, C. F. (2000). Cross-cultural leadership development. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(4), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollnick, S., & Miller, W. R. (1995). What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sample, P. L., & Darragh, A. R. (1998). Perceptions of care access: The experience of rural and urban women following brain injury. Brain Injury, 12(10), 855–874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, J. (1995). The blind men and the elephant. In M. Gardner (Eds.), Famous poems from Bygone Days (p. 124). Courier Dove Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-28623-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E., & Stanley, B. (1988). Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist, 43(1), 49–55. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. (1998). Elvin: The elephant who forgets. Youngsville NC: Lash and Associates Publishing Training Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, S. P. (2005). Reactions to invisible disability: The experience of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(6), 293–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terre Blanche, M., & Durrheim, K. (1999). Histories of the present: Social science research in context. In M. Terre Blanche, K. Durrheim, & D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (pp. 1–16). Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, D. L., Heston, M. L., & Fitzgerald, L. M. (2009). Research methods for the self-study of practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B., Fleming, J., Cornwell, P., Worrall, L., Ownsworth, T., Haines, T., et al. (2007). A qualitative study of the transition from hospital to home for individuals with acquired brain injury and their family caregivers. Brain Injury, 21(11), 1119–1130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uprichard, S. (2010). Experiences of the process of adjustment to a brain injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). University of Hertfordshire. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2299/452

  • van Maanen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1993). Ignorance in educational research or, how can you not know that? Educational Researcher, 22(5), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellings, K., Branigan, P., & Mitchell, K. (2000). Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: Using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 2(3), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdershoven, G. (1993). The story of life: Hermeneutic perspectives on the relationship between narrative and life history. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), The narrative study of lives (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eltham, VIC, Australia

    Christine Durham

  2. Future Social Service Institute, Centre for Applied Social Research, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Paul Ramcharan

Authors
  1. Christine Durham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Ramcharan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Durham .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durham, C., Ramcharan, P. (2018). The Body-Subject Perspective of ABI—A Literature Review of Qualitative Studies. In: Insight into Acquired Brain Injury. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5666-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5666-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5665-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5666-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation