Labor Standards and Export-Platform FDI in Unionized Oligopoly

  • Ki-Dong LeeEmail author
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 18)


Reflecting the growing importance of domestic labor market institution on FDI flow, many theoretical attempts have been conducted on the role of domestic labor market institution such as labor union’s bargaining power and unions’ relative preferences toward wages, as potential influences on the direction of FDI flow (Smith, Eur Econ Rev 31:89–96, 1987; Horstmann and Markusen, Int Econ Rev 28:109–121, 1987; Mezzetti and Dinopoulos, J Int Econ 31:79–100, 1991; Bughin and Vannini, Int J Indus Organ 13:127–145, 1995; Straume, Int J Indus Organ 20:631–652, 2002; Naylor and Santoni, J Int Trade Econ Dev 12:1–18, 2003; Lommerud et al., Econ J 113:782–800, 2003; Hur and Zhao, J Econ Behav Organ 71:259–272, 2009; Lee and Lee, Econ Model 54:479–489, 2016). It should be noted that since the above studies on strategic FDI incorporating domestic labor market institution, which normally uses international unionized oligopoly model, were limited to a simple two-country model, they could NOT appropriately capture more complexed FDI mode of these days. A prominent example of such complex FDI is the export-platform FDI. In this paper, we construct a locational model of unionized oligopoly, where export and export-platform FDI are alternative modes for serving a third-country market, and examine welfare effects of outward FDI induced by union activities. More specifically, by assuming that the government has the power to affect the bargaining power of the union through the legislation, we derive the optimal level of labor standard from the viewpoint of FDI source country.



This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2014S1A3A2044643).


  1. Bughin, J., and S. Vannini. 1995. Strategic direct investment under unionized oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13: 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ekholm, K., R. Forslid, and J.R. Markusen. 2007. Export-platform foreign direct investment. Journal of the European Economic Association 5: 776–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hanson, G.H., R.J. Mataloni, and M.J. Slaughter. 2001. Expansion strategies of U.S. multinational firms. In Susan M. Collins and D. Rodrick (eds), Brookings Trade Forum 2001, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 245–282.Google Scholar
  4. Horstmann, I.J., and J.R. Markusen. 1987. Strategic investments and the development of multinationals. International Economic Review 28: 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hur, J., and L. Zhao. 2009. Labor standards, labor-management bargaining and international rivalry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71: 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ishida, J., and N. Matsushima. 2009. Should civil servants be restricted in wage bargaining? A mixed-duopoly approach. Journal of Public Economics 93: 634–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ito, T. 2013. Export platform foreign direct investment: Theory and evidence. The World Economy 36: 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leahy, D., and C. Montagna. 2005. Union legislation and export platform FDI. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 14: 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, K.-D., and W. Lee. 2016. Export vs export-platform FDI with endogenous wage determination. Economic Modelling 54: 479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lommerud, K.E., F. Meland, and L. Sørgard. 2003. Unionized oligopoly, trade liberalization and location choice. Economic Journal 113: 782–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mezzetti, C., and E. Dinopoulos. 1991. Domestic unionization and import competition. Journal of International Economics 31: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Naylor, R., and M. Santoni. 2003. Foreign direct investment and wage bargaining. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 12: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, A. 1987. Strategic investment, multinational corporations and trade policy. European Economic Review 31: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Straume, O.R. 2002. Union collusion and intra-industry trade. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keimyung UniversityDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations