Advertisement

A Comparison of National and Local Airport Management

  • Akio KawasakiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 18)

Abstract

This chapter aims to address the following issues. First, do national or local airports set lower airport fee? Second, which type of airport undertakes more activities to reduce costs? Finally, which management type is socially preferable? In order to address these problems, this chapter assumes two substitute airports. Each airport locates in the city which has different number of passengers. As a result, this chapter demonstrates that depending on the number of passenger in each city, the comparison results change.

References

  1. Abbott, M., and S. Wu. 2002. Total factor productivity and efficiency of Australian airport. American Economic Review 35: 244–260.Google Scholar
  2. Akai, N. 2010. Koutuuinfra-to-gabanansu-no-keizaigaku. Yuuhikaku.Google Scholar
  3. Anton, J.J., J. Vander, and N. Vettas. 1998. Strategic pricing and entry under universal service and cross-market pricing constraints. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chon, P., L. Flochel, and A. Perrot. 2000. Universal service obligations and competition. Information Economics and Policy 12: 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeGraba, P. 1990. Input market price discrimination and the choice of technology. American Economic Review 80: 1246–1253.Google Scholar
  6. Dixit, A. 1979. A model of Duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domney, M.D., H.I.M. Wilson, and E. Chen. 2005. Natural monopoly privatization under different regulatory regimes: A comparison of New Zealand and Australian airports. International Journal of Public Sector Management 18: 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hart, O., A. Schleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1997. The proper scope of government: Theory and application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1127–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoppe, E.I., and P.W. Schmitz. 2010. Public versus private ownership: Quantity contracts and the allocation of investments tasks. Journal of Public Economics 94: 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooper, O.G., and D.A., Hensher. 1997. Measuring total factor productivity of airports – an index number approach. Transportation Research Part E 33: 249–259.Google Scholar
  11. Kawasaki, A. 2012. Who should own component airports? Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Kagoshima University Culture and Social Science 63: 1–26.Google Scholar
  12. Liao, P.C. 2008. Downstream R&D rivalry with spillovers and discriminatory input pricing. Australian Economic Papers 47: 376–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mantin, B. 2012. Airport complementarity: Private vs. government ownership and welfare gravitation. Transportation Research Part B 46: 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsumura, T., and N. Matsushima. 2012. Airport privatization and international competition. Japanese Economic Review 63: 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oum, T.H., N. Adler, and C. Yu. 2006. Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world’s major airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 12: 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oum, T.H., J. Yan, and C. Yu. 2008. Ownership forms matter for airport efficiency: A stochastic frontier investigation of worldwide airports. Journal of Urban Economics 43: 422–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parker, D. 1999. The performance of BAA before and after privatization. Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy 33: 113–146.Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt, K.M. 1996a. The costs and benefits of privatization: An incomplete contracts approach. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt, K.M. 1996b. Incomplete contracts and privatization. European Economic Review 40: 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Valletti, T.M., S. Hoernig, and P.P. Barros. 2002. Universal service and entry: The role of uniform pricing and coverage constraints. Journal of Regulatory Economics 21: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oita University, 700, DannoharuOitaJapan

Personalised recommendations