Role of Public Support in Sports Fan Formation Processes: Approach by Cultural Transmission Model

  • Hirofumi FukuyamaEmail author
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 18)


The consumption activity of watching sports generates an experience value of “being moved.” Through sports, people gain some non-monetary value, such as “being moved” and “being connected” with others, which cannot be replaced by viewing other phenomena. Numerous studies have used the contingent valuation method (CVM) to measure these non-monetary values of “being moved” and “making connections,” which cannot be traded in the market. These studies, examining four North American major sports (hockey, basketball, football, and baseball) or European soccer teams as examples (Castellanos et al., J Sports Econ 12(4):464–486, 2011), measured the non-monetary values that professional sports teams can generate. For instance, Johnson et al. (J Sports Econ 2(1):6–21, 2001) measured the annual intangible value that the Pittsburgh Penguins, an American professional ice hockey league, bestowed upon the local community, calculating its value: as much as 5.27 million dollars (on average, 5.57 USD per household). This value is significantly higher among Penguin fans than among those who are not. Fans not only receive experience values through watching their supported team’s matches; they are also believed to receive other various benefits such as the existential value of the sports team, including the pride of living in the town that has the team.


  1. Bisin, A., and T. Verdier. 2000. A model of cultural transmission, voting and political ideology. European Journal of Political Economy 16: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisin, A., and T. Verdier. 2001. The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 97: 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisin, A., and T. Verdier. 2011. The economics of cultural transmission and socialization. In Handbook of social economics, Volume 1A, eds. J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, and M. Jackson, 339–416. San Diego: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castellanos, P., J. Garcia, and J.M. Sanchez. 2011. The willingness to pay to keep a football club in a city: How important are the methodological issues? Journal of Sports Economics 12(4): 464–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujimoto, J. 2006. A study of the transfiguration of fans’ attitudes toward Osaka Kintetsu Buffaloes: Using longitudinal interview method to examine fans’ attitudes toward the team. Bulletin of Osaka University of Health and Sport Sciences 37: 57–72.Google Scholar
  6. Gradstein, M., and M. Justman 2005. The melting pot and school choice. Journal of Public Economics 89: 871–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, B.K., P.A. Groothuis, and J.C. Whitehead. 2001. The value of public goods generated by a major league sports team. Journal of Sports Economics 2(1): 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kobayashi, I. 2015. Economics of sports. PHP Institute. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  9. Leeds, M.A., and P.V. Allmen. 2010. The economics of sports, Pearson Education. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Olivier, J., M. Thoening, and T. Verdier. 2008 Globalization and the dynamics of cultural identity. Journal of International Economics 76: 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations