Skip to main content

Can Migration Affect the Decision of Governmental Fiscal Bailout?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Approaches to Societal Institutions and Economics

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 18))

  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

In general, it has been revealed that grants from the central government to local government, which does not undertake responsibility for local finance, cannot guarantee efficient financial management. This observation is based on the recognition through experiments that the central government bails out local governments when they face a default caused by their lax management. This problem is called a soft budget constraint, which was defined by Kornai (Econometrica 47:801–820, 1979; Economics of shortage. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980; Kyklos 39:3–30, 1986) as occurring when a bailout from the central government incurs local financial management that allows for ex post bailout to the local governments (Akai (Financ Rev 82:79–101, 2006, In Japanese) summarizes previous theoretical studies on soft budget constraint in detail.). In the case of Korea, Oh (Kor J Public Adm 46(3):121–143, 2008) analyzed the circumstance of Korean local finance and concluded that the soft budget constraint problem arises readily in Korea because local finance has a high level of dependence on the central government due to the serious local tax revenue imbalance, and this high dependence impedes the autonomy and responsibility of the local government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Akai (2006) summarizes previous theoretical studies on soft budget constraint in detail.

  2. 2.

    We assume that firms in region 1 is more productive than those in region 2, i.e., γ 1 < γ 2.

  3. 3.

    To obtain positive values, it must be n i > 1.

  4. 4.

    We set α = 0. 3,  γ 1 = 0. 01,  γ 2 = 0. 015,  N = 100.

    Fig. 13.1
    figure 1

    The change of B 1 along with increasing n 1

  5. 5.

    Although it is true that the default of a region accompanies social cost, we neglect this social cost since we do not consider the case of default.

  6. 6.

    This result depends on the definition of social welfare. The social welfare function in this paper is typical utilitarian welfare function. If we raise the weight of region 1, the result will be changed. To do so, however, it is necessary to provide reasonable evidence.

References

  • Akai, N. 2006. Contractual problems in inter-governmental relationships (central & regional) – With focus on problems of soft budget constraint. Financial Review 82: 79–101 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A., R. Cornes, and E. Silva. 2000. pure public goods and income redistribution in a federation with decentralized leadership and imperfect labor mobility. Journal of Public Economics 77: 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facchini, G., and C. Testa. 2008. Fiscal decentralization, regional inequality and bail-out: Lessons from Brazil’s debt crisis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 48: 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatters, F., V. Henderson, and P. Mieszkowski. 1974. Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics 3: 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodspeed, T.J. 2002. Bailouts in federation. International Tax and Public Finance 9(4): 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1979. Resource constraints versus demand constraint systems. Econometrica 47: 801–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1986. The soft budget constraint. Kyklos 39: 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. 2016. Fiscal decentralization and soft budget constraint. The Journal of Social science 23(1): 261–278 (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Interior, Korea. 2015. Summary of Local Budget for FY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. 2016. FY 2014 Settlement White Paper on Local Public Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naito, T., and T. Omori. 2016. Household’s disaster prevention activities, agglomeration, and economic growth. Regional Science Policy and Practice 8(4): 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W.E. 1972. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Y. 2008. A study of fiscal decentralization and the soft budget constraint. Korean Journal of Public Administration 46(3): 121–143 (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y., and G. Roland. 1998. Federalism and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review 88: 1143–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D.E. 1997. Externalities and bailouts: Hard and soft budget constraints in intragovernmental fiscal relations. Mimeo, Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2014S1A3A2044643).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woohyung Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, W. (2017). Can Migration Affect the Decision of Governmental Fiscal Bailout?. In: Naito, T., Lee, W., Ouchida, Y. (eds) Applied Approaches to Societal Institutions and Economics. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5663-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5663-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5662-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5663-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics