Skip to main content

Bott Periodicity, Submanifolds, and Vector Bundles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hermitian–Grassmannian Submanifolds

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 203))

Abstract

We sketch a geometric proof of the classical theorem of Atiyah, Bott, and Shapiro [3] which relates Clifford modules to vector bundles over spheres. Every module of the Clifford algebra \(Cl_k\) defines a particular vector bundle over \(\mathord {\mathbb S}^{k+1}\), a generalized Hopf bundle, and the theorem asserts that this correspondence between \(Cl_k\)-modules and stable vector bundles over \(\mathord {\mathbb S}^{k+1}\) is an isomorphism modulo \(Cl_{k+1}\)-modules. We prove this theorem directly, based on explicit deformations as in Milnor’s book on Morse theory [8], and without referring to the Bott periodicity theorem as in [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(s(P) \subset \hat{G}\) is a connected component of the set \(\{g\in \hat{G}: g^{-1} = g\}\). When we choose a symmetric metric on \(\hat{G}\) such that \(g\mapsto g^{-1}\) is an isometry, s(P) is a reflective submanifold and hence totally geodesic, thus symmetric.

  2. 2.

    A deck transformation of \(\pi : P\rightarrow \bar{P}\) is an isometry \(\delta \) of P with \(\pi \circ \delta = \pi \).

  3. 3.

    Consider a symmetric space P and a covering \(\pi :P\rightarrow P/\varDelta \) for some discrete freely acting group \(\varDelta \) of isometries on P. Then \(P/\varDelta \) is again symmetric if and only if each symmetry \(s_p\) of P maps \(\varDelta \)-orbits onto \(\varDelta \)-orbits. Thus for each \(\delta \in \varDelta \) we have \(s_p(\delta x) = \tilde{\delta }s_p(x)\) for all \(x\in P\), and \(\tilde{\delta }\in \varDelta \) is independent of x, by discreteness. Thus \(s_p\delta = \tilde{\delta }s_p\), in particular \(s_p\delta s_p = \tilde{\delta }\in \varDelta \). For any other symmetry \(s_q\) we have the same equation \(s_q\delta = \tilde{\delta }s_q\) with the same \(\tilde{\delta }\in \varDelta \), again by discreteness. Thus \(\delta ^{-1}s_ps_q\delta = s_p\tilde{\delta }^{-1}\tilde{\delta }s_q = s_ps_q\), and \(\delta \) commutes with the transvection \(s_ps_q\) (see also [14, Theorem 8.3.11]).

  4. 4.

    \(H^1\) means that \(\lambda \) has a derivative almost everywhere which is square integrable. Replacing any path \(\lambda \) by a geodesic polygon with N vertices, we may replace \(\varLambda \) by a finite dimensional manifold, cf. [8].

  5. 5.

    A different argument using root systems was given by Bott (6.7) [4] and in more detail by Mitchell [9, 10].

  6. 6.

    Putting \(S_n = (J_1\dots J_n)^2\) we have

    $$S_n = J_1\dots J_nJ_1\dots J_n = (-1)^{n-1}S_{n-1}J_n^2 = (-1)^nS_{n-1},$$

    thus \(S_n = (-1)^sI\) with \(s = n+(n-1)+\dots +1 = \frac{1}{2} n(n+1)\). When \(n = k-1 \equiv 1\mod 4\), then s is odd, hence \(S_n = -I\).

  7. 7.

    Any one-parameter subgroup \(\gamma \) in \(SO_n\) is a family of planar rotations in perpendicular planes. When \(\gamma (1) = -I\), all rotation angles are odd multiples of \(\pi \). The squared length of \(\gamma \) is the sum of the squared rotation angles. Thus the length is minimal if all rotation angles are just \(\pm \pi \).

  8. 8.

    The clutching map \(\phi : \mathord {\mathbb S}^k\rightarrow SO_{n}\) splits into components \(\phi _j : \mathord {\mathbb S}^k \rightarrow SO(V_j)\). The domain \(\mathord {\mathbb S}^k\) is the union of totally geodesic spherical \((k-1)\)-discs \(D_v\), \(v\in \mathord {\mathbb S}^1\), centered at v and perpendicular to \(\mathord {\mathbb S}^1\). All \(D_v\) have a common boundary \(\mathord {\mathbb S}^{k-2}\). Since \(\phi _0|_{D_v}\) is constant in v, it is contractable along \(D_v\) to a constant map.

    figure l
  9. 9.

    In fact, both \({\mathscr {V}}_k\) and \({\mathscr {A}}_k\) are abelian groups with respect to direct sums, not just semigroups, and \(\alpha \) is a group homomorphism. Using the tensor product, \({\mathscr {V}}= \sum _k {\mathscr {V}}_k\) and \({\mathscr {A}}= \sum _k {\mathscr {A}}_k\) become rings and \(\alpha \) a ring homomorphism, see [3].

References

  1. Atiyah, M.: K-Theory. Benjamin (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atiyah, M., Bott, R.: On the periodicity theorem for complex vector bundles. Acta Math. 112, 229–247 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Atiyah, M., Bott, R., Shapiro, A.: Clifford modules. Topology 3, 3–38 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bott, R.: The stable homotopy of the classical groups. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 43, 933–935 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bott, R.: The stable homotopy of the classical groups. Ann. Math. 70, 313–337 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, B.-Y., Nagano, T.: Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces II. Duke Math. J. 45, 405–425 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawson, H.B., Michelson, M.-L.: Spin Geometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milnor, J.: Morse Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell, S.A.: The Bott filtration of a loop group. Springer Lect. Notes Math. 1298, 215–226 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, S.A.: Quillen’s theorem on buildings and the loops on a symmetric space. Enseign. Math. (II) 34, 123–166 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagano, T.: The involutions of compact symmetric spaces. Tokyo J. Math. 11, 57–79 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Quast, P.: Complex structures and chains of symmetric spaces, Habilitationsschrift Augsburg (2010) (available from the author)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quast, P.: Centrioles in Symmetric Spaces. Nagoya Math. J. 211, 51–77 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf, J.A.: Spaces of Constant Curvature, 5th edn. Publish or Perish, Wilmington (Delaware) (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Hanke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eschenburg, J., Hanke, B. (2017). Bott Periodicity, Submanifolds, and Vector Bundles. In: Suh, Y., Ohnita, Y., Zhou, J., Kim, B., Lee, H. (eds) Hermitian–Grassmannian Submanifolds. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 203. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5556-0_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics