Skip to main content

Community-Building Survey of Safety and Living for a Lively Future: Results From Taro, Kuwagsaki, and Unosumai Districts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community-Based Reconstruction of Society

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSKUSSRS))

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the result of the questionnaire survey in the 11 districts of temporary housing complex where the 2011-Great East Japan Tsunami affected household concentrate, conducted in January 2015, followed by a caravan tour that reported the results in August and September 2015. Questionnaires were distributed to all households within each temporary housing complex with distribution to a total of 3,296 households (up to three persons over the age of 18 within a household could provide separate responses). A total of 967 responses were received, a response household rate of 19.8%. Upon receiving the results of the responses, public seminars that addressed the topic of future community building were conducted in 8 districts. The following series of reports will summarize the questionnaire results and topics raised at the public seminars on Taro and Kuwagasaki districts in Miyako city and Unosumai district in Kamaishi city, Iwate Prefecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications’ “Policy Evaluation Guideline” (approved in 2004, revised in 2012), clear identification of the policy structure (policy, measures, operations) (1–1) and informing the budget and accounts for the policy evaluation is required (1–3), and further specialized policy evaluations for important policies is necessary (1–4). Concerning evaluation methods, program evaluation methods of the efficiency of usage of funds at the operations level, performance evaluation methods reliant upon quantitative and qualitative targets that demonstrate achievement of policy objectives (or alternative objectives if there are no basic objectives), and for important policies and policies linked to systematic reform, the relationship between policy and results, external factors, the necessity of administrative involvement, alternative proposals, overall consistency between policies and priority levels are expected to be researched and considered in the comprehensive evaluation method.

  2. 2.

    Individual property rights guarantee in Sect. 3, Supreme Court judgments on compensation.

  3. 3.

    According to the author’s interview with Kamaishi City’s Recovery Promotion Department in March 2016, the Recovery Community Building Committee in each district are mainly organized as directed by the administration, but the Unosumai Recovery Community Building Committee is unique for being an organization led by the residents’ leaders. According to the author’s interviews with the leaders, they have acted as an intermediary between the administration and residents.

  4. 4.

    Following the 1991 eruption of Mount Unzen and the 1993 Okushiri tsunami, which each had comparatively easy reconstruction of housing, the distribution of donations from across the country equaled 10 million yen per household. By comparison, at the time of the Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake, which had a much higher number of victims, the distribution of donations was a much smaller amount of 100,000–300,000 yen per household.

References

  • Iwate Prefecture (2014) Report of progress of Iwate Prefecture’s Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami recovery plan (Iwate Recovery Report), Iwate Prefecture

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2012) Industrial economic recovery and livelihood support. Nihon Saigai Fukkou Gakkaishi Fukkou No 5 (Japan Disaster Recovery Journal Recovery No 5) 4(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2013a) Funds that do not reach victims: obstructions to ‘Human Recovery’. Nihon Saigai Fukkou Gakkaishi Fukkou 6 [Japan Disaster Recovery Journal Recovery (No 6)]:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2013b) Guarantees for participation in disaster recovery: a comparison of Japan, Thailand and Indonesia. Kokusai Kyouryoku Ronshu (International Cooperation) 22, No 2, Kobe University Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2014a) The government and individual rights in disaster recovery: the Great East Japan earthquake and Asia. In: Koyanagi S (ed) Saigai to Hou (Disaster and Law) Houbunka Sosho No 12, Kokusai Shoin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2014b) Compensating private rights and access to the law in Asian disaster recovery. Kokusai Kyouryoku Ronshu (International Cooperation) 22, No 2, Kobe University Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies, pp 1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2015) Proposals for a disaster recovery basic law: lessons from two major disasters. Disaster Recovery Support Platform (ed) Kobehatsu Shinsai Fukkougaku (Lessons from Kobe in Disaster Recovery), Minerva Shobo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko Y (2016) Systemic theories on ‘People and Recovery’: lessons from two major disasters and homework for a disaster recovery basic law. In: Matsuoka K (ed) Shinsai Fukkou no Hou to Seisaku (Law and Policy in Disaster Recovery), Seibundoh Shoshu

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobe City (1999) Fiscal Year 1999 Kobe Citizens’ Awareness survey: survey results and data collection, Kobe City

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobe City (2004) Fiscal Year 2003 “Summary and evaluation of recovery” Report, Kobe City

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagi Prefecture (2015) Miyagi’s future vision and Miyagi Prefecture disaster recovery plan: outcomes and evaluation (Overview), Miyagi Prefecture

    Google Scholar 

  • Reconstruction Agency (2013) Fiscal Years 2011–2012 Reconstruction agency policy evaluation report (Post-Facto Evaluation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reconstruction Agency (2014) Fiscal Year 2013 Reconstruction agency policy evaluation report (Post-Facto Evaluation)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuka Kaneko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaneko, Y. (2017). Community-Building Survey of Safety and Living for a Lively Future: Results From Taro, Kuwagsaki, and Unosumai Districts. In: Hokugo, A., Kaneko, Y. (eds) Community-Based Reconstruction of Society. SpringerBriefs in Economics(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5463-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics