Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inserting Critical Mathematics into STEM Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
STEM Education in the Junior Secondary

Abstract

The chapter begins by asking whether STEM education is a friend or foe to the field of critical mathematics education (CME) by reviewing how mainstream STEM conflicts with CME but also provides spaces for critical work. Tensions between CME and STEM include mainstream STEM’s emphasis on human capital, inattention to environmental degradation, and soft-critical orientation to social justice issues. However, STEM’s emphases on interdisciplinarity can provide opportunities for critical mathematics education to take place. We argue that STEM education as policy can be an opportunistic space to simultaneously resist and reconstitute in line with the values and goals of CME. We extend CME’s goals with deeper theoretical consideration to the nature of the ecological and social crises, in so doing we draw on ecofeminism and EcoJustice Education. The chapter concludes with a model “critical STEM” unit plan sketch that is appropriate for the Junior Secondary level. CME, ecofeminist theory, and internationally benchmarked content standards provide the foundation for our STEM unit plan titled “A Story of Incarceration.” By this example, we intend to show that critical STEM projects can be transformative for learners as well meet the content goals of standard STEM education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A. (2001). Educating for eco-justice and community. Eugene, OR: Eco-Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A. (2016a). In the grip of the past. Eugene, OR: Eco-Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A. (2016b). A critical examination of STEM: Issues and challenges. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesky, N., & Wolfmeyer, M. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, A., Barwell, R., Cotton, T., Winter, J., & Brown, L. (2013). Teaching secondary mathematics as if the planet mattered. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core, Inc. (2013). A story of ratios: A curriculum overview for grades 6–8. Available at: https://www.engageny.org/file/8761/download/a-story-of-ratios-a-curriculum-overview-for-grades-6-8.pdf

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Available at: corestandards.org

  • Drew, D. (2011). STEM the tide: Reforming science, technology, engineering and math education in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenstein, M. (1983). Critical mathematics education: An application of Paulo Freire’s epistemology. Journal of Education, 165(4), 315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Research, 32(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Towards a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrabowski, F. (2016). Broadening perception in the American STEM workforce. BioSience, 62(4), 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R. (2010). Performing oneself differently: A mathemaesthetician’s responsibility. Educational Insights, 13(1): http://einsights.ogpr.educ.ubc.ca/v13n01/articles/khan/index.html

  • Khan, R. (2011). Ethnomathematics as mythopoetic curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimme, D. (1998). Jail design guide: A resource for small and medium-sized jails. Champaign, IL: Kimme and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larnell, G., Bullock, E., & Jett, C. (2016). Rethinking teaching and learning mathematics for social justice from a critical race perspective. Journal of Education, 196(1), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. (2013). Why Scandinavian prisons are superior: Open prisons, in which detainees are allowed to live like regular citizens, should be a model for the U.S. The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupinacci, J., & Happel, A. (2015). Recognize, resist, & reconstitute: An EcoJustice response to neoliberalism. In M. Abendroth & B. Porfilio (Eds.), Schools against the neoliberal rule (pp. 269–287). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (2013). Race, racial projects and mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 316–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martusewicz, R., Edmundson, J., & Lupinacci, J. (2015). EcoJustice education: Toward diverse, democratic and sustainable communities (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M., & King, R. (2007). Uneven justice: State rates of incarceration by race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1983). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, R., & Cobb, C. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (1985). Mathematical education versus critical education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(4), 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (2011). An invitation to critical mathematics education. Boston: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for Tomorrow’s America. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, R. (2015). World prison population list. Available at: http://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/world_prison_population_list_11th_edition.pdf

  • Warren, K. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfmeyer, M. (2014). Mathematics education for America? Big business, policy networks, and pedagogy wars. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfmeyer, M. (2013). STEM, meet ecojustice. Green Theory and Praxis, 7(1), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, Kutztown, PA, USA

    Mark Wolfmeyer

  2. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

    John Lupinacci

  3. State University of New York, New Paltz, NY, USA

    Nataly Chesky

Authors
  1. Mark Wolfmeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Lupinacci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nataly Chesky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Wolfmeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Canberra, Bruce, Aust Capital Terr, Australia

    Robyn Jorgensen

  2. School of EPS, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Kevin Larkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolfmeyer, M., Lupinacci, J., Chesky, N. (2018). Inserting Critical Mathematics into STEM Education. In: Jorgensen, R., Larkin, K. (eds) STEM Education in the Junior Secondary. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5447-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5448-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation