Skip to main content

Imaging Method: Technological and Computing Innovations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Best Practice Protocols for Physique Assessment in Sport
  • 1108 Accesses

Abstract

Technological and computing innovations are rapidly transforming the tools we employ for recording, measuring, collating and interpreting body dimension and composition assessments. Three-dimensional body scanning systems integrated with other imaging modalities to create multi-faceted digital human profiles, and artificial intelligence techniques such as deep learning and artificial neural networks, are set to revolutionise the physique assessment landscape over the coming decade. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is regarded as the current gold standard for determining body fat percentage and lean mass. Leveraging computer vision techniques, it is now possible to register an individual’s dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived body composition with the mesh exported by the same individual’s three-dimensional body scan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • El-Sallam Abd A, Bennamoun M, Sohel F, Alderson JA, Lyttle AD, Rossi M (2013) A low cost 3D markerless system for the reconstruction of athletic techniques. Paper presented at the IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehnapfel A, Ahnert P, Loeffler M, Scholz M (2017) Body surface assessment with 3D laser-based anthropometry: reliability, validation, and improvement of empirical surface formulae. Eur J Appl Physiol 117(2):371–380

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lands LC, Hornby L, Hohenkerk JM, Glorieux FH (1996) Accuracy of measurements of small changes in soft-tissue mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Clin Invest Med 19(4):279–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pataky TC, Zatsiorsky VM, Challis JH (2003) A simple method to determine body segment masses in vivo: reliability, accuracy and sensitivity analysis. Clin Biomech 18(4):364–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöhlmann S, Harkness E, Taylor C, Astley S (2016) Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. valuation of Kinect 3D Sensor for Healthcare. Imaging 36:857

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Lyttle A, El-Sallam A, Benjanuvatra N, Blanksby B (2013) Body segment inertial parameters of elite swimmers using DXA and indirect methods. J Sports Sci Med 12(4):761–775

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi MM, Alderson J, El-Sallam A, Dowling J, Reinbolt J, Donnelly CJ (2016) A new validation technique for estimations of body segment inertia tensors: principal axes of inertia do matter. J Biomech 49(16):4119–4123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winby CR, Lloyd DG, Kirk TB (2008) Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters. J Biomech 41(8):1682–1688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline A. Alderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alderson, J.A. (2018). Imaging Method: Technological and Computing Innovations. In: Hume, P., Kerr, D., Ackland, T. (eds) Best Practice Protocols for Physique Assessment in Sport. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5418-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5418-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5417-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5418-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics