Skip to main content

Surgical Aspects of Paravalvular Leak

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure

Abstract

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a common complication after surgical valve replacement, with reported incidences at follow-up varying from 2% to 17% in both mitral and aortic positions [1–3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1152–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ionescu A, Fraser AG, Butchart EG. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart. 2003;89:1316–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Genoni M, Franzen D, Vogt P, Seifert B, Jenni R, Künzli A, et al. Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:14–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishida T, Sonoda H, Oishi Y, Tanoue Y, Nakashima A, Shiokawa Y, et al. Single- institution, 22-year follow-up of 786 CarboMedics mechanical valves used for both primary surgery and reoperation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1493–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jindani A, Neville EM, Venn G, Williams BT. Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;32:503–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller DL, Morris JJ, Schaff HV, Mullany CJ, Nishimura RA, Orszulak TA. Reoperation for aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: identification of patients at risk and results of operation. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:160–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. LaPar DJ, Yang Z, Stukenborg GJ, Peeler BB, Kern JA, Kron IL, et al. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement after previous sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:263–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, Hauser SL, Larry Jameson J, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 19th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Cicco G, Lorusso R, Colli A, et al. Aortic valve periprosthetic leakage, anatomic observations and surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chambers EP Jr, Heath BJ. Comparison of supra-annular and subannular pledgeted sutures in mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;51:60. discussion 63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhasmana JP, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT. Factors associated with periprosthetic leakage follo wing primary mitral valve replacement: with special consideration of the suture technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;35:170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Torregrosa S, Gomez-Plana J, Valera FJ, et al. Long-term clinical experience with the Omnicarbon prosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burckhardt D, Striebel D, Vogt S, et al. Heart valve replacement with St Jude Medical valve prosthesis: long-term experience in 743 patients in Switzerland. Circulation. 1988;78:I18–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallucci V, Mazzucco A, Bortolotti U, et al. The standard Hancock porcine bioprosthesis: overall experience at the University of Padova. J Card Surg. 1988;3:337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Cicco G, Russo C, Moreo A, Beghi C, Fucci C, Gerometta P, et al. Mitral valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomical observations in 135 patients from a multicenter study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:887–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rallidis LS, Moyssakis IE, Ikonomidis I, Nihoyannopoulos P. Natural history of early aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation: a five-year follow-up. Am Heart J. 1999;138:351–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wasowicz M, Meineri M, Djaiani G, Mitsakakis N, Hegazi N, Xu W, et al. Early complications and immediate postoperative outcomes of paravalvular leaks after valve replacement surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:610–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon SM, Serkey JM, Longworth DL, et al. Early onset prosthetic valve endocarditis: the Cleveland Clinic experience 1992–1997. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lytle BW, Priest BP, Taylor PC, et al. Surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. David TE, Feindel CM. Reconstruction of the mitral annulus. A ten-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:1323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. David TE. The surgical treatment of patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;7:47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taramasso M, Maisano F, Denti P, Guidotti A, Sticchi A, Pozzoli A, et al. Surgical treatment of paravalvular leak: long-term results in a single-center experience (up to 14 years). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(5):1270–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hourihan M, Perry SB, Mandell VS, Keane JF, Rome JJ, Bittl JA, et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1371–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taramasso M, Maisano F, Latib A, Denti P, Guidotti A, Sticchi A, et al. Conventional surgery and transcatheter closure via surgical transapical approach for paravalvular leak repair in high-risk patients: results from a single-centre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15:1161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Binder RK, Webb JG. Percutaneous mitral and aortic paravalvular leak repair: indications, current application, and future directions. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Taramasso M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pozzoli, A., Alfieri, O., Maisano, F., Taramasso, M. (2017). Surgical Aspects of Paravalvular Leak. In: Smolka, G., Wojakowski, W., Tendera, M. (eds) Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5400-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5400-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5399-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5400-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics