Skip to main content

Introduction: On Doing Field Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstracts

The introduction chapter outlines Bourdieu’s theorising, which is not reducible to static definitions of capital, habitus and field, but focuses on their operationalisation. Each of these concepts work in dynamic relationships set within specific locations. At the risk of oversimplifying Bourdieu’s sociology, his method consists of three nonlinear, recursive analytical moves: relating the field to the broader field of power ; identifying the structure of relations within it; and revealing the potential positions and the social trajectories of actors. Illustrating the programmatic power of his methodology, the introduction references Bourdieu’s analytical moves in The Social Structure of the Economy (2005), On the State: Lectures at the College de France, 1989–1999 (2014), and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albright, J. (2006). Literacy education after Bourdieu. The American Journal of Semiotics, 22(1–4), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction a social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). Noblesse d’état. The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power (L. Clough, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sketch for a self-analysis (R. Nice, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2008). The bachelors’ ball: The crisis of peasant society in Béarn. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989–1992. P. Champagne, R. Lenoir, F. Poupeau, & M. C. Rivière (Eds.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Boltanski, L., & Chamboredon, J. C. (1963). The Bank and its clients: Elements of a sociology of credit. Center for European Sociology of the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Nice, R. (1980). The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media, Culture & Society, 2(3), 261–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (R. Rice, Trans.). London: Sage in association with Theory, Culture & Society, Dept. of Administrative and Social Studies, Teesside Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M., & James, D. (2004). Change in the field—changing the field: Bourdieu and the methodological practice of educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig, J. (1996). Academic distinctions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (1999). Realism in the sociology of education: ‘Explaining’ social differences in attainment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(1), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albright, J., Hartman, D. (2018). Introduction: On Doing Field Analysis. In: Albright, J., Hartman, D., Widin, J. (eds) Bourdieu’s Field Theory and the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5385-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5385-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5384-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5385-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics