Skip to main content

Hybrid Nature-Inspired Algorithms: Methodologies, Architecture, and Reviews

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 628))

Abstract

Evolutionary computation has turned into a significant problem-solving approach among several researchers. As compared to other existing techniques of global optimization, the population-based combined learning procedure, robustness, and self-adaptation are some of the vital topographies of evolutionary algorithms. In spite of evolutionary algorithms has been broadly acknowledged for resolving numerous significant real applications in various areas; however in practice, occasionally they carry only fringe performance. There is slight motivation to assume that one can discover an unvaryingly finest optimization algorithm for resolving all optimization problems. Evolutionary algorithm depiction is resolute by the manipulation and survey liaison retained during the course. All this evidently elucidates the necessity for fusion of evolutionary methodologies, and the aim is to enhance the performance of direct evolutionary approach. Fusion of evolutionary algorithms in recent times is gaining popularity owing to their proficiencies to resolve numerous legitimate problems such as, boisterous environment, fuzziness, vagueness, complexity, and uncertainty. In this paper, first we highlight the necessity for fusion of evolutionary algorithms and then we explain the several potentials of an evolutionary algorithm hybridization and also discuss the general architecture of evolutionary algorithm’s fusion that has progressed all through the recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Chan, K.Y., T.S. Dillon, and C.K. Kwong. 2011. Modeling of a Liquid Epoxy Molding Process Using a Particle Swarm Optimization-Base Fuzzy Regression Approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7 (1): 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang, K.S., R.J. Yin, S. Kwong, and K.T. Ng. 2011. A Theoretical Development and Analysis of Jumping Gene Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7 (3): 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spall, J.C. 2003. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K. 2001. Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Coello, C.A.C., D.A.V. Veldhuizen, and G.B. Lamont. 2002. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multiobjective Problems. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiben, A.E., and J.E. Smith. 2003. Introduction to Evolutionary Computation, 175–188. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonseca, C., and P. Fleming. 1995. An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, G., A. Robertson, C. Santimetvirul, and P. Willett. 1995. Non-hierarchic Document Clustering Using a Genetic Algorithm. Information Research 1 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn, C. 2006. Advances in Evolutionary Algorithms: Theory, Design and Practice. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bäck, T., and H. Schwefel. 1993. An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1 (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beyer, H.G., and B. Send Hoff. 2008. Covariance Matrix Adaptation Revisited—The CMSA Evolution Strategy. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5199, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anupam, Trivedia, Dipti, Srinivasana, Subhodip, Biswasc, Thomas, Reindlb. 2015. Hybridizing Genetic Algorithm with Differential Evolution for Solving the Unit Commitment Scheduling Problem. Science Direct Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 23: 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahi, Mostafa, Ömer Kaan Baykan, and Halife Kodaz. 2015. A New Hybrid Method Based on Particle Swarm Optimization, Antcolony Optimization and 3-opt Algorithms for Traveling Salesman Problem. Applied Soft Computing 30: 484–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cai, Yiqiao, and Jiahai Wang. 2015. Differential Evolution with Hybrid Linkage Crossover. Information Sciences 320: 244–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Oleiwi, B.K., H. Roth, and B.I. Kazem. 2014. A Hybrid Approach Based on ACO and GA for Multi Objective Mobile Robot Path Planning. Applied Mechanics and Materials 527: 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ming-Yi Ju, Siao-En Wang, and Jian-Horn Guo. 2014. Path Planning Using a Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Tree Structure Encoding. The Scientific World Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Das, P.K., H.S. Behera, and B.K. Panigrahi. 2016. A Hybridization of an Improved Particle Swarm Optimization and Gravitational Search Algorithm for Multi-Robot Path Planning. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wolpert, D.H., and W.G. Macready. 1997. No Free Lunch Theorems for Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1 (1): 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jing, Yang, Wen-Tao, Li, Xiao-Wei, Shi, Li, Xin, Jian-Feng, Yu. 2013. A hybrid ABC-DE Algorithm and Its Application for Time-Modulated Arrays Pattern Synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61 (11).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu-Jun, Zheng, Hai-Feng, Ling, Sheng-Yong, Chen, Jin-Yun, Xue. 2015. A Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy Network Based on Differential Biogeography-Based Optimization for Online Population Classification in Earthquakes. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 23 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jie, Li, Junqi, Zhang, ChangJun, Jiang, and MengChu, Zhou. 2015. Composite Particle Swarm Optimizer with Historical Memory for Function Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 45 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lixin, Tang, and Xianpeng, Wang. 2013. A Hybrid Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 17 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liangjun, Ke, Qingfu, Zhang, and R. Battiti. 2014. Hybridization of Decomposition and Local Search for Multiobjective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 44 (10).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sindhya, K., K. Miettinen, and K. Deb. 2013. A Hybrid Framework for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 17 (4): 495–511.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Dixit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dixit, A., Kumar, S., Pant, M., Bansal, R. (2018). Hybrid Nature-Inspired Algorithms: Methodologies, Architecture, and Reviews. In: Reddy, M., Viswanath, K., K.M., S. (eds) International Proceedings on Advances in Soft Computing, Intelligent Systems and Applications . Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 628. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5272-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5272-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5272-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics