Advertisement

Macroeconomic Impacts of the Crisis on European Emerging Markets

  • Peter Havlik
Chapter

Abstract

The global crisis of 2008–2009 hit the Central and East European emerging markets disproportionally hard, albeit in a rather uneven manner across individual countries. Whereas Poland has been the only country which managed to avoid recession in 2009, the rest of the region suffered from a huge economic contraction (in some countries, e.g. the Baltics, triggered by flawed domestic policies initiated well before the Lehman crisis). The subsequent recovery has not been particularly impressive and the post-crisis GDP growth rates generally remain much below the previous performance. The process of the region’s economic convergence has stalled; some countries even fell behind the core EU in terms of relative development levels. The weak post-crisis recovery has been associated with stubbornly high unemployment, with younger and lower-skilled workers affected the most. This chapter will analyse differentiated patterns of economic performance in individual CEE emerging markets during the past decade with the help of comparable macroeconomic indicators from the wiiw database, identify the main transmission channels of the crisis as well as the driving forces of recovery. The role of diverse exchange rate policies, export specialization patterns, and competitiveness will be empirically evaluated and discussed as well.

References

  1. Adarov, A., & Havlik, P. (2016). Benefits and costs of DCFTA: Evaluation of the impact on Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine (Joint Working Paper of wiiw and Bertelsmann Stiftung). Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw).Google Scholar
  2. Astrov, V., et al. (2016). Labour shortages driving economic growth? (Autumn Forecast Report). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York/Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Bruegel and wiiw. (2010). Wither growth in Central and Eastern Europe? Policy lessons for and integrated Europe. Brussels: Bruegel Blueprint Series.Google Scholar
  5. Dobrinsky, R., & Havlik, P. (2014). Economic convergence and structural change: The role of transition and EU accession (Research Report No. 395). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  6. Dobrinsky, R., et al. (2016). The Belarus economy: The challenges of stalled reforms (Research Report No. 413). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  7. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development). (2013). Transition report: Stuck in transition? London: EBRD.Google Scholar
  8. ECFIN (Economic and Financial Affairs of the European Commission). (2017). European economic forecast: Winter 2017 (Institutional Paper No. 048). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. Havlik, P. (2014a). Patterns of structural change in the new EU member states (Research Report No. 394). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  10. Havlik, P. (2014b). Economic consequences of the Ukraine conflict (Policy Notes and Reports No. 14). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  11. Havlik, P. (2015). Russian Federation 2015: From stagnation to recession and back (Research Reports No. 406). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  12. Havlik, P., et al. (2011). Recovery—in low gear across tough terrain (Current Analysis and Forecast No. 7). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  13. Holzner, M., et al. (2017). Cautious upturn in CESEE: Haunted by the spectre of uncertainty (Spring Forecast Report). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  14. Landesmann, M., & Hanzl-Weiss, D. (2016). Correcting external imbalances in the European economy. In M. Belka, E. Nowotny, P. Samecki, & D. Ritzberger-Grünwald (Eds.), Boosting European competitiveness: The role of CESEE countries (pp. 14–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landesmann, M., & Leitner, S. (2015). Competitiveness of the European economy (Research Report No. 401). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  16. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2016). Escaping the low-growth trap? Effective fiscal initiatives avoiding trade pitfall (Economic Outlook No). 100. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  17. Podkaminer, L. (2013). Development pattern of Central and Eastern European countries (in the course of transition and following EU membership) (Research Report No. 388). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  18. Podpiera, J., Raei, F., & Stepanyan, A. (2017). A fresh look at potential output in Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European countries (Working Paper No. WP/17/37). Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  19. Rzońca, A., & Łaszek, A. (2016). On economic growth in Europe, or, the uncertain growth prospects of western countries (mBankCASE Seminar Proceedings No. 144/2016). Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  20. Stöllinger, R., Foster-MsGregor, N., Holzner, M., Landesmann, M., Pöschl, J., & Stehrer, R. (2013). A ‘manufacturing imperative’ in the EU: Europe’s position in global manufacturing and the role of industrial policy (Research Report No. 391). Vienna: wiiw.Google Scholar
  21. World Bank. (2012). Drivers of convergence in EU11 (Special Topic in EU11 Regular Economic Report). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Havlik
    • 1
  1. 1.Vienna Institute for International Economic StudiesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations