Skip to main content

On System Identification for Accelerated Destructive Degradation Testing of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Statistical Modeling for Degradation Data

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

  • 1575 Accesses

Abstract

Accelerated destructive degradation testing is considered with the objective of reproducing high fatigue incidents for a severely nonlinear system in a lab environment. In the lab, a test specimen is mounted on servo hydraulic actuators which are then used to induce the same response in the system as was measured in field tests. Finding the inputs to the actuators that accurately induce the measured response in the system is crucial to the integrity of the testing procedure. The problem is an inverse problem, and often exhibits ill-posed characteristics. To this end a new method for system identification from time series data is developed and is shown to outperform current methods such as different variants of NARX and Hammerstein-Wiener models. From the results obtained it is concluded that an alternative method of data generation for accelerated destructive degradation on severely nonlinear systems in a lab context is required. Three methods are developed and tested on simulated data and it is shown that a prototype bootstrapping strategy is superior: using 400,000 data points generated by this strategy the input signals were predicted with mean square errors of 5.08e-4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Method 514.6 Annex A.

References

  1. Agostinacchio M, Ciampa D, Olita S (2014) The vibrations induced by surface irregularities in road pavements–a MATLAB®; approach. Eur Transp Res Rev 6(3):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguirre LA, Letellier C (2009) Modeling nonlinear dynamics and chaos: a review. Math Probl Eng. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/238960

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Billings SA (2013) Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Burden R, Faires J (2005) Numerical analysis. Cole, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Crous J, Kok S, Wilke DN, Heyns PS (2016) An alternative approach to system identification. In: Proceedings of the 10th South African conference on computational and applied mechanics

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crous J, Kok S, Wilke DN, Heyns PS (2016, Submitted to Machine Learning) A scaling-rotation based approach to multi-target regression in high dimensional spaces as an alternative to the standard projection based approaches

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eksteen J, Heyns P (2016) An alternative update formula for non-linear model-based iterative learning control. Inverse Prob Sci Eng 24(5):860–888

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Eksteen JJA (2014) Advances in iterative learning control with application to structural dynamic response reconstruction. PhD thesis, University of Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golub GH, Van Loan CF (2012) Matrix computations, vol. 3. JHU Press, Baltimore Maryland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Han X, Xie W-F, Fu Z, Luo W (2011) Nonlinear systems identification using dynamic multi-time scale neural networks. Neurocomputing 74(17):3428–3439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikonen T, Peltokorpi O, Karhunen J (2015) Inverse ice-induced moment determination on the propeller of an ice-going vessel. Cold Reg Sci Technol 112:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kerschen G, Worden K, Vakakis AF, Golinval J-C (2006) Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(3):505–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kugler DL, Kramer LL (2003) Accelerated destructive degradation tests: data, models, and analysis. Math Stat Methods Reliab 7:319

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Leontaritis I, Billings SA (1985) Input-output parametric models for non-linear systems part I: deterministic non-linear systems. Int J Control 41(2):303–328

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Leontaritis I, Billings SA (1985) Input-output parametric models for non-linear systems part II: stochastic non-linear systems. Int J Control 41(2):329–344

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. MIL-STD-810G (2008) Enviromental engineering considerations and laboratory tests. Department of Defence

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moon FC (2004) Chaotic vibrations: an introduction for applied scientists and engineers. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearson R (2003) Selecting nonlinear model structures for computer control. J Process Control 13(1):1–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Petracconi C, Ferreira S, Palma E (2010) Fatigue life simulation of a rear tow hook assembly of a passenger car. Eng Fail Anal 17(2):455–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pillonetto G, Dinuzzo F, Chen T, De Nicolao G, Ljung L (2014) Kernel methods in system identification, machine learning and function estimation: a survey. Automatica 50(3):657–682

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Schramm D, Bardini R, Hiller M (2014) Vehicle dynamics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sirca G, Adeli H (2012) System identification in structural engineering. Scientia Iranica 19(6):1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sjöberg J, Zhang Q, Ljung L, Benveniste A, Delyon B, Glorennec P-Y, Hjalmarsson H, Juditsky A (1995) Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview. Automatica 31(12):1691–1724

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Slotine J-JE, Li W et al (1991) Applied nonlinear control, vol. 199. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Smolders K, Volckaert M, Swevers J (2008) Tracking control of nonlinear lumped mechanical continuous-time systems: a model-based iterative learning approach. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(8):1896–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strang G (2007) Computational science and engineering, vol. 1. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Strang G (2007) Linear algebra and its applications, vol. 1. Cengage Learning, Boston Massachusetts.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacq Crous .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crous, J., Wilke, D.N., Kok, S., (Din) Chen, DG., Heyns, S. (2017). On System Identification for Accelerated Destructive Degradation Testing of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems. In: Chen, DG., Lio, Y., Ng, H., Tsai, TR. (eds) Statistical Modeling for Degradation Data. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5194-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics