Abstract
Correct identity of the wild relatives of cultivated species with distinctive features and verified taxonomic entity is key to facilitate their successful utilization in breeding programs of cultivated species by transfer of desirable gene. Unfortunately, the issue of synonymy, i.e., multiple names for a single species entity, has been critical in the assessment of biological diversity in general and wild species diversity. A systematic study is essential to estimate wild species diversity, with an objective of reducing or solving the misunderstanding about such lacunae/gaps. The biological species concept plays a key role in this regard, though it is underappreciated in all biodiversity matters (Mallet 1995), including genetic resources, especially with those concerned with species diversity and synonymy, affecting their use. Widespread acceptance of the biological species concept (Mayr 1942) led many taxonomists in the mid-twentieth century to treat earlier names as synonyms of large polytypic species. Modern workers, perhaps increasingly motivated by the phylogenetic interests, lay greater emphasis on diagnosis of taxa and less on their reproductive limits (Cracraft 1989). Thus, a trend for reutilization of names that were earlier treated synonyms has been seen. Nearly 15% of the names of all valid species are today considered synonyms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bremekamp CEB (1944) Materials for a monograph of the Strobilanthinae. Verhandelingen der Nederlandsche Akademie van Wettenschappen Afdeeling Natuurkunde, Tweede Sectie 41(1): 1–305.
Brown AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–824
Camp WH, Gilly CL (1943) The structure and origin of species. Britonia 4:323–385
Cracraft J (1989) Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. In: Otte D, Endler JA (eds) Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 28–59
De Wet JMJ, Huckabay JP (1967) The origin of Sorghum bicolor. II. Distribution and domestication. Evolution 21:787–802
Govaerts R (2001) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50:1085–1090
Harlan JR, De Wet JMJ (1971) Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509–517
Jakushevsky ES (1969) Varietal composition of sorghum and its use for breeding. Bull Appl Bot Genet Plant Breed 41:148–178
Jeffrey C (1968) Systematic categories for cultivated plants. Taxon 17:109–240
Jirasek V (1966) The systematics of cultivated plants and their taxonomic categories. Preslia 38:267–284
Mallet J (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 10:294–299
Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
Scotland RW, Wortley AH (2003) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 52(1):101–104
Singh AK, Simpson CE (1994) Biosystematic and genetic resources. In: Smartt J (ed) The groundnut crop, a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 96–138
Smartt J (1990) Grain legumes – evolution and genetic resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 379
Snowden JD (1935) A classification of the cultivated sorghums. Royal Bot Gard, Kew No 5:221–225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singh, A.K. (2017). Classification of Wild Species to Facilitate Conservation and Gene Transfer. In: Wild Relatives of Cultivated Plants in India . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5116-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5116-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5115-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5116-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)