Artificial Organs

  • Theodore G. PapaioannouEmail author
Part of the Series in BioEngineering book series (SERBIOENG)


Since antiquity humans develop and use technologies with the ultimate purpose to augment their ability to survive, to treat or eradicate diseases, to enhance quality of living, to better adjust to environmental changes and to prolong lifespan. From the ancient Theriac, an all-purpose cure for a wide range of illnesses [1], to the modern medical technologies, these purposes remain the same. The conceptualization, design, development, test, validation and clinical application of human-made artificial organs has been for centuries a great technological and clinical challenge that can serve these endless humans’ objectives. In our days amazing achievements have occurred due to the rapid progress in technology and particularly in materials science, biotechnology, nanotechnology, tissue and genetic engineering, biomechanics, biosensors, robotics and information technologies. All these advances have been also translated into the design and developement of artificial organs.


  1. 1.
    Karaberopoulos D, Karamanou M, Androutsos G (2012) The theriac in antiquity. Lancet 379:1942–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris PD, Narracott A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Silva Soto DA, Hsiao S, Lungu A, Evans P, Bressloff NW, Lawford PV, Hose DR, Gunn JP (2016) Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine. Heart 102:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Formaggia L, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A (2009) Cardiovascular mathematics: modeling and simulation of the circulatory system. Springer, Milan, New York, p xiii, 522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lopez-Perez A, Sebastian R, Ferrero JM (2015) Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications. Biomed Eng Online 14:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vardoulis O, Coppens E, Martin B, Reymond P, Tozzi P, Stergiopulos N (2011) Impact of aortic grafts on arterial pressure: a computational fluid dynamics study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:704–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reymond P, Bohraus Y, Perren F, Lazeyras F, Stergiopulos N (2011) Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301:H1173–H1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reymond P, Merenda F, Perren F, Rufenacht D, Stergiopulos N (2009) Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 297:H208–H222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vavuranakis M, Papaioannou TG, Katsarou OA, Vrachatis DA, Sanidas EA, Siasos G, Kalogeras KI, Schizas D, Stefanadis CI, Tousoulis D (2016) Impact of atherosclerotic plaque components and their distribution on stent deployment: an intravascular-ultrasound virtual histology observational study. Minerva Cardioangiol 64:507–516Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindsay AC, Paulo M, Kadriye K, Tejeiro R, Alegria-Barrero E, Chan PH, Foin N, Syrseloudis D, Di Mario C (2013) Predictors of stent strut malapposition in calcified vessels using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 25:429–434Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van der Heiden K, Gijsen FJ, Narracott A, Hsiao S, Halliday I, Gunn J, Wentzel JJ, Evans PC (2013) The effects of stenting on shear stress: relevance to endothelial injury and repair. Cardiovasc Res 99:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papaioannou TG, Karatzis EN, Vavuranakis M, Lekakis JP, Stefanadis C (2006) Assessment of vascular wall shear stress and implications for atherosclerotic disease. Int J Cardiol 113:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    LaDisa JF Jr, Olson LE, Guler I, Hettrick DA, Audi SH, Kersten JR, Warltier DC, Pagel PS (2004) Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery. J Appl Physiol 97:424–30. Discussion 416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gervaso F, Capelli C, Petrini L, Lattanzio S, Di Virgilio L, Migliavacca F (2008) On the effects of different strategies in modelling balloon-expandable stenting by means of finite element method. J Biomech 41:1206–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2009) Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation 119:1034–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hasan A, Ragaert K, Swieszkowski W, Selimovic S, Paul A, Camci-Unal G, Mofrad MR, Khademhosseini A (2014) Biomechanical properties of native and tissue engineered heart valve constructs. J Biomech 47:1949–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sacks MS, David Merryman W, Schmidt DE (2009) On the biomechanics of heart valve function. J Biomech 42:1804–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibbon JH Jr (1954) Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 37:171–185. PassimGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moulopoulos SD, Topaz S, Kolff WJ (1962) Diastolic balloon pumping (with carbon dioxide) in the aorta–a mechanical assistance to the failing circulation. Am Heart J 63:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C (2005) Basic principles of the intraaortic balloon pump and mechanisms affecting its performance. ASAIO J 51:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nanas JN, Moulopoulos SD (1994) Counterpulsation: historical background, technical improvements, hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Cardiology 84:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papaioannou TG, Mathioulakis DS, Stamatelopoulos KS, Gialafos EJ, Lekakis JP, Nanas J, Stamatelopoulos SF, Tsangaris SG (2004) New aspects on the role of blood pressure and arterial stiffness in mechanical assistance by intra-aortic balloon pump: in-vitro data and their application in clinical practice. Artif Organs 28:717–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papaioannou TG, Terrovitis J, Kanakakis J, Stamatelopoulos KS, Protogerou AD, Lekakis JP, Nanas JN, Stamatelopoulos SF (2002) Heart rate effect on hemodynamics during mechanical assistance by the intra-aortic balloon pump. Int J Artif Organs 25:1160–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolyva C, Pepper JR, Khir AW (2016) Newly shaped intra-aortic balloons improve the performance of counterpulsation at the semirecumbent position: an in vitro study. Artif Organs 40:E146–E157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khir AW (2013) The balancing act of timing the intra-aortic balloon pump. Artif Organs 37:848–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aye TP, Htet ZL, Singhavilai T, Naiyanetr P (2015) Effect of intra-aortic balloon pump on coronary blood flow during different balloon cycles support: a computer study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015:3303–3306Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giridharan GA, Koenig SC, Mitchell M, Gartner M, Pantalos GM (2007) A computer model of the pediatric circulatory system for testing pediatric assist devices. ASAIO J 53:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schampaert S, Rutten MC, van TVM, van Nunen LX, Tonino PA, Pijls NH, van de Vosse FN (2013) Modeling the interaction between the intra-aortic balloon pump and the cardiovascular system: the effect of timing. ASAIO J 59:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller GE (2006) Artificial heart and cardiac assist devices. In: Miller GE (ed) Artificial Organs, 1st edn. Morgan & Claypool, USA, pp 11–19Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marx V (2015) Tissue engineering: organs from the lab. Nature 522:373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deretic I, Lorenz Sorgner S (2015) From humanism to meta-, post- and transhumanism? Peter Lang AGGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering and Cardiovascular Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering Unit, First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical SchoolNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations