Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Usability Study of Mobile Learning Application in Higher Education Context: An Example from Fiji National University

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region

Part of the book series: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects ((EDAP,volume 40))

Abstract

Mobile learning is transforming the delivery of education and training in the higher education sector by providing students with the opportunity to learn anywhere and anytime. Mobile devices have small screen sizes, little input capability and processing power that make designing and using mobile learning applications a challenging task. MLearn was a pilot project undertaken at Fiji National University (FNU) to provide a mobile learning facility for its distance and flexible learning students. In response to the dissatisfaction expressed by these students, an in-depth usability evaluation of the MLearn application was conducted. The study was conducted using 30 students studying through a distance or flexible learning mode who were recruited to examine the system for ease of use, usefulness and satisfaction. The sample included a wide variety of experienced and inexperienced students across the university. Data was collected using questionnaires and group interviews. The data gathered was subjected to reliability analysis followed by a comprehensive evaluation based on the specified usability criteria. Data analysis was performed on the whole sample, as well as on each of the groupings (experienced and inexperienced users). The results highlighted minor usability problems, and recommendations were derived to further improve the application. Findings from this research will be applied to develop a set of guideline to support the future design of mobile learning applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, A. A. (2013). A framework for measuring the usability issues and criteria of mobile learning applications (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario). Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1184/

  • Asabere, N. Y. (2013). Benefits and challenges of mobile learning implementation: Story of developing nations. International Journal of Computer Applications, 73(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, A., & Hagel, G. (2014). Engaging students with a mobile game-based learning system in university education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 8(4), 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, N. (2009). Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human centered design (pp. 13–22). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyinbode, O. K., & Ng’ambi, D. (2013). An interactive mobile lecturing tool for empowering distance learners. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 7(4), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandhok, S., & Babbar, P. (2011). M-learning in distance education libraries: A case scenario of Indira Gandhi National Open University. The Electronic Library, 29(5), 637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J., & Tellez, C. A. (2008). Mobile banking and economic development: Linking adoption, impact, and use. Asian journal of communication, 18(4), 318–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducut, E., & Fontelo, P. (2008). Mobile devices in health education: Current use and practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Portland: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebb, B. A., & Young, Z. (2014). Mobile resource use in a distance learning population: What are they really doing on those devices? Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 288–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organization. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva: International Standards Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. P. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE Journal, 14(1), 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldskov, J., Graham, C., Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Howard, S., Balbo, S., & Davies, J. (2005). Evaluating the usability of a mobile guide: The influence of location, participants and resources. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B. A., & Hussein, S. (2014). Heuristic based user interface evaluation of mobile money application: A case study. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research, 5(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, L. Y., Ooi, K. B., Chong, A. Y. L., & Lin, B. (2011). Influence of individual characteristics, perceived usefulness and ease of use on mobile entertainment adoption. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 9(4), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C., Chang, M., Huang, E., & Chen, C. W. (2011). Architecture and collaborations among agents in mobile educational game. In Pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 556–560). Seattle: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C., Chang, M., Kinshuk, Huang, E., & Chen, C.-W. (2012). Usability of story in context-aware mobile educational game. In R. Huang (Ed.), Proceedings of the global Chinese conference on computers in education (pp. 337–340). Hong Kong, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumder, M., & Basu, P. N. (2010). Usability study of personalized learning in mobile learning environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 4(3), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayebi, F., Desharnais, J. M., & Abran, A. (2012). The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation. Paper presented at the IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jean-Marc_Desharnais/publication/242094885_The_State_of_the_Art_of_Mobile_Application_Usability_Evaluation/links/02e7e52554e7fe7a35000000.pdf

  • Nichols, A., Billey, A., Spitzform, P., Stokes, A., & Tran, C. (2014). Kicking the tires: A usability study of the primo discovery tool. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 172–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability inspection methods. In C. Plaisant (Ed.), CHI ‘94 Conference companion on human factors in computing systems (pp. 413–414). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/259963.260531.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosli, M., Ismail, I., Idrus, R. M., & Ziden, A. A. (2010). Adoption of mobile learning among distance education students in Universiti Sains Malaysia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 4(2), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppälä, P., & Alamäki, H. (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 330–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233–249). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shuib, M., Abdullah, A., Azizan, S. N., & Gunasegaran, T. (2015). Designing an intelligent mobile learning tool for grammar learning (i-mol). International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 9(1), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valk, J. H., Rashid, A. T., & Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Q., Chang, Z., & Cheng, Q. (2015). Usability study of the mobile library app: An example from Chongqing University. Library Hi Tech, 33(3), 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J., & Green, D. (2010). Identifying emerging issues in mobile learning in higher and further education: A report to JISC. University of Bristol. Retrieved from http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/education/migrated/documents/emergereport.pdf

  • Yousef, A., Chatti, M., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2015). A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: An experimental case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2.) Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2032.

  • Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 18(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Fiji National University, Lautoka, Fiji

    Bimal Aklesh Kumar & Priya Mohite

Authors
  1. Bimal Aklesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Priya Mohite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimal Aklesh Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Angela Murphy

  2. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Helen Farley

  3. University of Technology Sydney, Kirribilli, New South Wales, Australia

    Laurel Evelyn Dyson

  4. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Hazel Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kumar, B.A., Mohite, P. (2017). Usability Study of Mobile Learning Application in Higher Education Context: An Example from Fiji National University. In: Murphy, A., Farley, H., Dyson, L., Jones, H. (eds) Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 40. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4943-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4944-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation