Abstract
This chapter presents an empirical investigation of mobile learning acceptance in the world heritage town of Luang Prabang, Lao PDR. Education is recognized as playing an important role in promoting awareness in many areas requiring preservation and protection. Since the inscription of Luang Prabang as a world heritage site, the rapid increase of tourist visits and development has created pressure on preservation. This study stems from the need to understand potential user behaviour prior to the implementation of mobile learning to promote World Heritage Site preservation awareness in Luang Prabang. The technology acceptance model was adopted as the theoretical framework to investigate the research objective. Further, this study evaluated the moderating role of personal innovativeness and social influence on mobile learning perceptions. Samples were drawn from students in two local higher education institutions. Quantitative data based on 334 respondents showed that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment directly affect behavioural intention to use mobile learning. Further, personal innovativeness and social influence moderated the relationship between perceived usefulness and behavioural intention. This study suggests that while there is high intention to adopt mobile learning among higher education students in Lao PDR, different degrees of innovativeness among the students should be taken into consideration. Also, practitioners are suggested to consider taking advantage of the strong social influence culture in Lao PDR when promoting the use of mobile learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173.
Ballantyne, R., Connell, S., & Fien, J. (1998). Students as catalysts of environmental change: A framework for researching intergenerational influence through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 285–298.
Boccardi, G., & Logan, W. (2008). Reactive monitoring mission to the town of Luang Prabang, (November 2007). Retrieved from whc.unesco.org/document/10057
Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Exploring the intention to use mobile learning: The moderating role of personal innovativeness. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 16, 40–61.
Chung, H. H., Chen, S. C., & Kuo, M. H. (2015). A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333–339.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Delors, J. (1996). Education: The necessary Utopia. In J. Delors (Ed.), Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century (pp. 13–33). Paris: UNESCO.
Dorner, D. G., & Gorman, G. E. (2011). Contextual factors affecting learning in Laos and the implications for information literacy education. Information Research, 15(1), 479.
Gerow, J., Galy, E., Thatcher, J., & Srite, M. (2010). Within-culture variation and information technology: An empirical assessment. In H. Gordon (Ed.), Technological advancement in developed and developing countries: Discoveries in global information management (pp. 337–364). Hershey: IGI Global.
Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., Bartosiewicz, A., Twardowska, A., & Ballantyne, R. (2003). Evaluating the impact of a school waste education programme upon students’, Parents’ and Teachers’ environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(2), 106–122.
Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
Hofstede, G. (2000). Culture’s consequences. Second edition. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hwang, Y., & Kim, D. J. (2007). Understanding affective commitment, collectivist culture, and social influence in relation to knowledge sharing in technology mediated learning. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 50(3), 232–248.
ITU. (2013). Lao P.D.R. profile (Latest data available: 2013). Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/net4/itu-d/icteye/CountryProfileReport.aspx?countryID=131
ITU. (2014). Measuring the information society report 2014. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2014.aspx
Jeong, N., Yoo, Y., & Ku, J. (2008). A study on moderating effect of personal innovativeness in mobile-RFID services. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology,Korea, Feb 17–20 2008.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Mobile learning as a catalyst for change. Open Learning: The Journal of Open Distance Learning, 25(3), 181–185.
La Belle, T. J. (1982). Formal, nonformal and informal education: A holistic perspective on lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 28(2), 159–175.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516.
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 61, 193–208.
Lee, M. K. O., Shi, N., Cheung, C. M. K., Lim, K. H., & Sia, C. L. (2011). Consumer’s decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Information & Management, 48(6), 185–191.
Lee, H., Chung, N., & Jung, T. (2015). Examining the cultural differences in acceptance of mobile augmented reality: Comparison of South Korea and Ireland. In I. Tussyadiah & A. Inversini (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 477–491). New York: Springer.
López-Nicolás, C., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2008). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information & Management, 45(6), 359–364.
Magni, M., Taylor, M. S., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). “To play or not to play”: A cross-temporal investigation using hedonic and instrumental perspectives to explain user intentions to explore a technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(9), 572–588.
Mangundjaya, W. L. H. (2011). The correlation and impact of uncertainty avoidance to innovative behaviour (a study among Minangkabau entrepreneurs). In 10th International Entrepreneurship Forum (pp. 9–11). Tamkeen, Bahrain.
Okumura, T., Leong, C., Takada, J., & Yamaguchi, S. Y. (2011). Analysis on sustainability of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) application database management of world heritage site of Luang Prabang, Lao P. D. R. In The Japan Society for International Development, 12th Spring Conference Proceedings (pp. 137–138).
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.
Paskaleva, K., & Megliola, M. (2010). Unlocking lifelong learning through E-heritage. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(1), 80–97.
Poong, Y. S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. (2013). Possibility to use mobile learning to promote world heritage site preservation awareness in Luang Prabang, Lao Pdr: A readiness study. In ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Volume II-5/W1, 2013 XXIV International CIPA Symposium, 2–6 September 2013, Strasbourg, France (pp. 247–252).
Simon, S. J., & Paper, D. (2007). User acceptance of voice recognition technology: An empirical extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 19(1), 24–50.
Takada, J., Yamaguchi, S., & Leong, C. (2008). Geographical Information System (GIS) and regional development* potential problems and feasible solutions. In The Japan society for international development, 19th annual conference proceedings (pp. 350–353).
Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Sim, J. J., & Phusavat, K. (2012). Determinants of mobile learning adoption: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(3), 82–91.
Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Leong, L. Y., & Lin, B. (2014). Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-neural networks approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 198–213.
Tengtrakul, P., & Peha, J. M. (2013). Does ICT in schools affect residential adoption and adult utilization outside schools? Telecommunications Policy, 37(6–7), 540–562.
Thatcher, J., Stepina, L., Srite, M., & Liu, Y. (2003). Culture, overload and personal innovativeness with information technology: Extending the nomological net. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(1), 74–81.
UNCTAD. (2015). The least developed countries report 2015: Transforming rural economies. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ldc2015_en.pdf
UNESCO. (1995). World Heritage Committee 19th Session. Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/archive/1995/whc-95-conf203-16e.pdf
UNESCO. (2012). The international standard classification of education 2011. Comparative social research. France. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdf
Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2011). Teacher perception for m-learning: Scale development and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 544–556.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11(4), 342–365.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Science, 27(3), 451–481.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & College, S. M. W. (2000). Theoretical acceptance extension model: Field four studies of the technology longitudinal. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.
Yang, S. (2013). Research on undergraduate student’s adoption of mobile learning: An emerging learning mode. International Journal on Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 5(8), 722–729.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: Measurement Items
Appendix A: Measurement Items
Construct | Items |
---|---|
Perceived usefulness | 1. I think using mobile phone for learning is useful in increasing my knowledge of preserving World Heritage Site |
2. I think using mobile phone for learning can increase my understanding to preserve World Heritage Site | |
Perceived ease of use | 1. I think it is easy for me to learn how to use mobile phone for learning |
2. I think I can use mobile phone for learning in a short time | |
3. I think it is easy to use mobile phone for learning | |
Perceived enjoyment | 1. I think using mobile phone for learning will be interesting |
2. I think it is fun to use mobile phone for learning | |
3. I think using mobile phone for learning will stimulate my curiosity | |
Personal innovativeness | 1. I think it is very interesting to try new information technologies |
2. I like to experiment with new information technologies | |
Social influence | 1. I think people who are important to me think that I should use mobile phone for learning |
2. I think my friends think that I should use mobile phone for learning | |
Behavioural Intention | 1. In the future, I intend to use mobile phone for learning |
2. I plan to use mobile phone for learning in the future |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poong, Y.S., Yamaguchi, S.Y., Takada, J.i. (2017). Analysing Mobile Learning Acceptance in the World Heritage Town of Luang Prabang, Lao PDR. In: Murphy, A., Farley, H., Dyson, L., Jones, H. (eds) Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 40. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4943-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4944-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)