Abstract
The distribution of power in the built environment of an urban space undoubtedly points to a complex labyrinth, wherein state power, civil society and actors in their everyday settings attempt to work through the macro-structures of ‘governmentality’. The present work, in this context, attempts to trace such flows of power negotiations in the metropolitan city of Delhi. It does so by examining such potentials, through the lenses of, what one might willy–nilly term, as the ‘social economy’ of everyday life. The work substantiates this central thesis by an ethnographic study of the implications of the recent demolition/displacement drive in Delhi on a low-income neighbourhood of the bank of Yamuna, i.e. Kudasiya Ghat. It teases through the numerous ways in which a multitude of actors navigate their way through urban life, especially in settings like that of the informal spaces in the Global South. More specifically, it explores the ways in which the discourse of ‘bourgeois environmentalism’ effectuated through the Delhi Master Plan 2021, is circumvented by an ensemble of actors—traditional elites, bureaucratic class and political agents—within their respective micro-settings. In fact, the present work attempts to see as to how the current judicial discourse on the cleansing of slums and the neo-liberal agenda of World Class city marketing strategies colluded through a repertoire of new modes of silent resistance. Thus, in so doing, it points to the growing resilience of the Foucauldian idea of ‘heterotopia’, as a key theoretical analytic which unpacks the urban form and its constituents. In conclusion, it raises further questions about the ways in which one tends to conceptualize emergent forms of citizenship in the Global South, through the prism of, what scholars like Arjun Appadurai term as ‘deep democracy’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Wazirpur Bartan Nirmata Sangh Vs Union of India and Others Court Judgment, 2002.
- 2.
Kudasiya Court Judgment, 2006.
- 3.
The respondent gave the permission about writing her name and profession. Hence, the ethical part of this experience sharing has been taken into consideration.
- 4.
It’s a festival where sister ties the designer threads on her brother’s wrist. In turn the brother takes a vow to protect her from the problems of her life.
- 5.
I’m using the term in the Gramscian Sense. For more details please see, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (1971).
- 6.
For more details please see, Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979 (2008).
- 7.
I’m using the term in a sense used by Partha Chatterjee, based upon the distinction between legal and illegal, for political society being in the realm of illegal. For more details please see, The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (2004).
- 8.
See footnote 1.
- 9.
See footnote 2.
References
Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–44.
Baviskar, A. (2004a). In the belly of river. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Baviskar, A. (2004b). Between violence and desire: Space, power and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi. International Social Sceince Journal, 55(175).
Baviskar, A. (2007). Waterscapes: The cultural politics of the natural resource. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
Baviskar, A. (2008). Contested grounds: Essays on nature culture and power. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Bhan, G. (2013). Planned inequalities. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(24), 59–70.
Bharucha, R. N. (2006). Yamuna gently weeps. New Delhi: Sainathan Communications.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). The weight of the world: social suffering in contemporary society [Translated by Priscilla Pankhurst Freguson]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech. A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
Campbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. Oxford: Basil, Blackwell.
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia: University Press.
Duncan, J., & Duncan, N. (2004). Landscapes of privilege: The politics of aesthetic in an American suburb. New York: Routledge.
Dutta, R. (2009). The unquiet river: An overview of select decisions of the courts on the river Yamuna. Delhi: Peace Institute Charitable Trust.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: Making and re-making of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fishman, R. (1987). Bourgeois utopias: The rise and fall of suburbia. NewYork: Basic Books.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the college de France, 1978–1979. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1994). Ecological conflicts and the environmental movement in India. Development and Change, 25(1), 101–136.
Gal, S. (1995). Language and the “arts of resistance”. Cultural Anthropology, 10(3), 407–424.
Ghertner, A. (2011). ‘Green Evictions: Environmental Discourse of a “Slum-free” Delhi’. In R. Peet, P. Robbins & M. J. Watts (Eds.), Global Political Ecology. London & New York: Routledge.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Guha, R. (1982). On some aspects of historiography of colonial India. In R. Guha (Ed.), Subaltern studies: Writing on South Asian history and society. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Anthropological Locations. California: University of California Press.
Holston, J. (1989). The modernist city: An anthropological critique of Brasilia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hannerz, U. (1987). ‘The world in creolization’. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 57(4), 546–559 (Sierra Leone, 1787–1987).
Holston, J., & Appadurai, A. (1996). Cities and citizenship. Public Culture, 8(2), 187–204.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2007). Identity and power in ecological conflicts. International Journal of Trans-disciplinary Research, 2(1), 17–41.
Nair, J. (2006). Social municipalism and the new metropolis. In M. E. John, S. Jodhka, & P. K. Jha (Eds.), Contested transformations: Changing economies and identities in contemporary India. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
Peet, R., & Watts, M. (July, 1993). Introduction: Development theory and environment in an age of market triumphalism. Economic Geography, 69(3), 227–253 (Environment and Development, Part 1).
Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the art of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. (1999). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes of improving human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Vela, J. (2010). Wilful neglect: The Yamuna river pollution reflects India’s environmental future. The Caravan: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 1(18), 30–40. Retrieved April 2, 2016, from http://justinvela.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/18_the-caravan-september-1-15.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jain, A. (2018). Sustainability or (Sustain)ability? Environmentalism and Shades of Power in a Metropolis. In: Mukherjee, J. (eds) Sustainable Urbanization in India. Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4932-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4932-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4931-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4932-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)