Advertisement

Quality Measurement: Tools and Techniques

  • Charu JainEmail author
  • Narayan Prasad
Chapter
  • 383 Downloads

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative research methods were adopted as complementary strategies for this study. While quantitative methods involved interviews through survey instruments, qualitative approach included key informers and observations attained thereof. Evaluation was carried out using both primary and secondary data sources. The description of various indicators used in the study, ways to measure them, econometric models applied, and the methodology used for the development of indexes has been also elaborated in this chapter. The limitations of the study have been mentioned in the last section of this chapter.

Keywords

Qualitative research Quantitative research Logistics regression Factor analysis Principal component analysis 

References

  1. Babbie, Earl R. (1986). The practice of social research (p. 1986). Belmont: Calif.Google Scholar
  2. Boeiji, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391–409.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, R. A., & Weekes, T. J. (1983). Book on data. New Jersey, USA: Models and Statistical Analysis. Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
  4. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  5. Driessen, H., & Jansen, W. (2013). The hard work of small talk in ethnographic fieldwork. Journal of Anthropological Research, 69(2), 249–263.Google Scholar
  6. Lee, J. W., & Barro, R. J. (2001). Schooling quality in a cross-section of countries. Economica, 38(272), 465–488.Google Scholar
  7. Marlow, C. (1993). Research methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  8. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed., p. 262). Sage Publication: Thousand Oaks (Social Science).Google Scholar
  9. Marshall, P. (1998). Quest for quality assessment. Harare: ZIMSEC.Google Scholar
  10. Meadows, K. A. (2003). So you want to do research? An overview of the research process. British Journal of Community Nursing, 8(8).Google Scholar
  11. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analyzing quantitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.Google Scholar
  12. Powers, E., & Witmer, H. (1951). An experiment in the prevention of delinquency: The Cambridge-somerville youth study. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Retherford, Robert D., & Choe, Minja K. (1993). Statistical models for causal analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Strauss, Anselm,& Corbin, Juliet M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Social Science, p. 312.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, J. (1977). Toward alternative forms of social work research: The case for naturalistic methods. Journal of Social Welfare, 4(2–3), 119–126.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). In-depth interviewing. In S. J. Taylor & R. Bogdan (Eds.), Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Council of Applied Economic ResearchNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.School of Social SciencesIndira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations