Advertisement

Taming the Paradox Between Facts and Control: Media Discourses on Natural Disasters in Chinese Media

  • Weimin ZhangEmail author
  • Peter C. Pugsley
Chapter
Part of the Encounters between East and West book series (EEWIP)

Abstract

Using discourse-historical approach, this study examines how the natural disaster information is framed in Chinese media. It presents a cross-section on how the diachronically transforming Chinese culture both produces the paradox concerned with the representation of the facts about the natural disasters and the intentionality to control it as demanded in the discursive power relations. Setting in the framework of discursive power and the control of the meaning production, this study explores the nuanced process whereby disaster information, dominant culture and the social power negotiate in representing the negative facts in natural disaster events. The findings indicate that the paradox between information transparency and the control of it is discursively balanced by closely engaging with cultural resources and finally dissolved in the transformed cultural context in contemporary China.

Keywords

Chinese media Foucault Discursive power Natural disaster Tiandao 

References

  1. Barker, C. (2012). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bary, T., & Bloom, I. (1999). Sources of Chinese tradition, (2nd ed., Vol. 1). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bary, T., Chan, W., & Watson, B. (1963). Sources of Chinese tradition. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benewick, R. (2008). Icons of power: Mao Zedong and the cultural revolution. In G. Benton (Eds.), Mao Zedong and the Chinese revolution (pp. 287–301). Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cavallaro, D. (2001). Critical and cultural theory. London and New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dai, B. (1983). On socialist journalistic work. People’s Daily Press. [戴邦,1983,《论社会主义新闻工作》,人民日报出版社,北京].Google Scholar
  8. Ding, B. (2010). An analysis of man-made disasters and its coverage—From social conflict perspective. Journalism Quarterly, 3, 30–36. [丁柏铨,2010,《人为灾难及其报道刍议—从社会冲突角度所作的探讨》, 《新闻大学》,(3): 30–36].Google Scholar
  9. Dong, T., & Cai, H. (2010). The changes and developments in contemporary China’s natural disaster coverage models. Journalism Review, 6. [董天策、蔡慧、于小雪,2010,《当代中国灾难新闻报道模式的演变》,《新闻记者》,(6):21–24].Google Scholar
  10. Edgar, A., & Sedgwick, P. (Eds.). (2008). Cultural theory: The key concepts (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Fang, H., Ning, S., & Chen, Y. (1999). History of Chinese journalism (Vol. 3). Beijing: China Renmin University Press. [方汉奇、宁树藩、陈业劭,1999,《中国新闻事业通史 — 第三卷》,中国人民大学出版社,北京].Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (2010). The archaeology of knowledge (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Huang, C. (2003). Transitional media vs. normative theories: Schramm, Altschull, and China. Journal of Communication, 53, 444–459.Google Scholar
  15. Huang, Y., & Lee, C.-C. (2003). Peddling party ideology for a profit: Media and the rise of Chinese nationalism in the 1990s. In G. D. Rawnsley & M.-Y. T. Rawnsley (Eds.), Political communications in greater China: The construction and reflection of identity (pp. 41–61). London and New York: Routledge Curzon Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  16. Jin, G., & Liu, Q. (2000). The origins of modern Chinese thought—The evolution of Chinese political culture from the perspective of ultra stable structure (Vol. 1). The Chinese University of Hongkong Press. [金观涛,刘青峰,2009,《中国现代思想的起源:超稳定结构与中国政治文化的演变 — 第一卷》,中文大学出版社,香港].Google Scholar
  17. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1977). Myth and meaning. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  18. Li, Y., & Xiong, L. (2009, April 10) Discovering Tonghai earthquake. Yunnan Daily. [李悦春,熊玲,2009年4月10日,“通海大地震揭秘”,《云南日报》].Google Scholar
  19. Mao, Z. (1975). A speech in Yan’an literary work symposium. Beijing: Renmin Press. [毛泽东,1975,《在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话》,人民出版社,北京].Google Scholar
  20. Mills, S. (2004). Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Nivison, D. S. (1991). Hsun Tzu and Chuang Tzu. In H. J. Rosemont (Ed.), Chinese texts and philosophical contexts. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  22. Pantti, M., Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Cottle, S. (2012), Disasters and the media, global crises and the media. Peterlang.Google Scholar
  23. Renwick, N., & Cao, Q. (2003). Modern political communication in China. In G. D. Rawnsley & M.-Y. T. Rawnsley (Eds.), Political communications in greater China: The construction and reflection of identity (pp. 62–82). London and New York: Routledge Curzon Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  24. Ruan, M. Zhenli biaozhun zhi zhan (The battle over the criterion of truth) (unpublished manuscript), p. 76. [阮铭,《真理标准之战》(未发表之文章),第76页].Google Scholar
  25. Schoenhals, M. (1991). The 1978 truth criterion controversy. The China Quarterly, 126, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen, Z. (2002). Methods for disaster reporting and their impacts on audiences’ right to know. Journalism Quarterly, 44–47 (Summer). [沈正赋,2002,《灾难新闻报道方法及其对受众知情权的影响》,《新闻大学》,夏季刊,第44-47页].Google Scholar
  27. Shi, Y., & Li, D. (2008). The history of the People’s Republic of China: When the “continuous revolution” goes awry: From the anti-Lin Biao campaign to the anti-Deng Xiaoping campaign (1972–1976) (Vol. 8). Research Centre for Contemporary Chinese Culture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. [史云,李丹慧,2008,《难以继续的“继续革命”— 从批林到批邓(1972–1976)》,香港中文大学当代中国文化研究中心,香港中文大学出版社,香港].Google Scholar
  28. Sigley, G. (1996). Governing Chinese bodies: The significance of studies in the concept of governmentality for the analysis of government in China. Economy and Society, 25(4), 457–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sigley, G. (2006). Chinese governmentalities: Government, governance and the socialist market economy. Economy and Society, 35(4), 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun, F. Y. (2001). From ‘people orientation’ to ‘event orientation’—An analysis of change in notions about China’s media coverage of natural disasters. Contemporary Communications, 2, 33–37. [孙发友,2001,《从“人本位”到“事本位”— 我国灾害报道观念变化分析》,《现代传播》,(2):33–37].Google Scholar
  31. Tian, Z. (2005). Research on disaster coverage in contemporary China (Ph.D. thesis, School of Journalism and Communication). Fudan University, China. [田中初,2005,《当代中国灾难新闻研究》,复旦大学新闻学院博士论文,上海].Google Scholar
  32. Todd, N. (2008). Ideological superstructure in Gramsci and Mao Tse-Tung. In G. Benton (Ed.), Mao Zedong and the Chinese revolution (pp. 89–99). Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, L. (2008). An analysis on ideology development in natural disaster coverage of China. Journalism Quarterly, 98(4), 29–34. [王蕾,2008,《论我国灾难新闻报道理念的转变》,《新闻大学》,(4): 29–34].Google Scholar
  34. Wang, H. (1998). Contemporary Chinese thought and the question of modernity. Social text, no. 55, intellectual politics in post-Tiananmen China (pp. 9–44). Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Weber, M. (1980). The three types of legitimate rule. In A. Etzioni & E. W. Lehman (Eds.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (3rd ed., pp. 4–10). New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Dallas, Montreal, Toronto, London, Sydney: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  36. Wei, Y. (2001), The mechanism of information openness in domestic China. Chinese Laws, 12, 20–23. [魏永征,2001,《中国内地的信息公开制度》,《中国法律》,(12):20–23].Google Scholar
  37. Wodak, S. (1994). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, C. (2010). The origin of Chinese philosophy—A history of occurring, developing and molding of ideas, concepts and thoughts before Chunqiu era. Shanghai Renmin Press. [吾淳,2010,《中国哲学的起源:前诸子时期观念、概念、思想发生发展与成型的历史》,上海人民出版社,上海].Google Scholar
  39. Xiao, D. (2008). Turning point in history: Re-examination of the cultural revolution and the policy of reform and opening. The history of the People’s Republic of China, Vol. 10, Research Center for Contemporary Chinese Culture, The Chinese University of Hongkong, Hongkong. [肖东连,2008,《历史的转轨 — 从拨乱反正到改革开放》,香港中文大学当代中国文化研究中心,香港中文大学出版社,香港].Google Scholar
  40. Xinhua News Agency. (October, 3 2013). Wu bangguo’s Address in the Assembly of the Fourth Committee in the Eleventh Congress (shiyi jie renda sici huiyi juxing quanti huiyi wubangguo zuo baogao). [新华社,2013年10月3日,《十一届人大四次会议举行全体会议吴邦国作报告》]. http://www.mlr.gov.cn/xwdt/jrxw/201103/t20110310_823109.htm. Retrieved October 12, 2013.
  41. Xu, B. (2014). Consensus crisis and civil society: The Sichuan earthquake response and state-society relations. The China Journal, no., 71, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yin, H. (2000). What can we take to console the dead? (women na shenme gaiwei wangling). China Youth Daily, January 12, 2000. [殷红,2000年1月12日,“我们拿什么告慰亡灵”,《中国青年报》].Google Scholar
  43. Yu, M. (1989). General presentation on China’s endeavor to establish and perfect its legal system since 1979. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 10(1), 27–30.Google Scholar
  44. Zhao, S. (2002). A narrative of tian ren he yi thesis. History Studies Monthly, 11, 5–17. [赵世超,2002,《“天人合一”述论》,《史学月刊》,(11):5–17].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Higher Education Press 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.The University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations