Civic Pluralism: Designing for Enriched Intercultural Experiences of Place

  • Mary GriffithsEmail author
Part of the Encounters between East and West book series (EEWIP)


This chapter addresses placemaking as a technique for developing civic pluralism. Municipal authorities face increased governance challenges when diverse groups flow into cities with established populations. The new groups, treated as ‘other’, may not be seen as part of the unfolding heritage in the life of a city. Physical segmentation and alienation can cause differences to be violently expressed on the grounds of religion, ethnicity, and perceptions of the right of possession. The Internet of Things (IoT) can create enriched experiences of urban heritage through its capacity to connect people and material objects in multiple, interactive ways. The chapter argues through illustrations, and an account of the design of research, that open, purposeful and technologically-enabled placemaking can facilitate a civic pluralism which is experiential, interactive and free from authoritatively monocultural majoritarianism in both assumptions and values. Designing pluralist heritage informatics and civic memorialization practices means re-purposing existing in situ heritage experiences, creating new ones available for self-curation, and collective production through free municipal wifi and high mobile connectivity. The IoT, in connecting unique urban waypoints and access to public resources, can contribute to multi-layered, individuated narratives of the city, which are designed to assist in the governance of differences.


Place Place-making Diversity Intercultural locatedness Smart technologies 


  1. Adelaide City Explorer. Retrieved on June 12, 2014.
  2. Adelaide City Heritage. Retrieved on June 12, 2014.
  3. Babar, A. (2016). Smart cities: Socio-technological innovation for empowering citizens. Australian Quarterly, 20–27 (July–September 2016).Google Scholar
  4. Calligeros, M. (2015). Would you step into aid a victim of a racist attack? The Age, 12–13.Google Scholar
  5. (2013). Introduction to the internet of things. Lopez Research. Retrieved on December 20, 2013.
  6. Retrieved on June 12, 2014.
  7. Dean, G., Bell, P., & Vakhitova, Z. (2016). Right-wing extremism in Australia: The rise of the radical right. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism, 11(2), 121–142. Retrieved January 10, 2017.
  8. Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7.1, 131–149. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2012.631815. Retrieved on June 12, 2014.
  9. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Harvester: Brighton.Google Scholar
  10. Gabbai, A. (2015, January). Retrieved on November 11, 2015.
  11. Gray, J. (2015). Unlocking internet of things. The Drum. Retrieved on May 26, 2015.
  12. Griffiths, J., & Chen, G. (2015, May 25). At CES Asia expo, tech gurus lay out vision for “internet of things”. South China Evening Post. 25 May, 2015. Retrieved on 30 May, 2015.
  13. Griffiths, M. (2016a). “Imagine if our cities talked to us”: Questions about the making of ‘responsive’ spaces and urban publics. In M. Griffiths & K. Barbour (Eds.), Making publics, making places (n.p.). Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. (2016b) Smart technologies and cultural heritage. Pilot studies in Adelaide and Canberra, February–July 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Griffiths, M., & Peacock, D. (2014). Playing the city: Mobile heritage informatics. Unfunded Australian Research Council proposal.Google Scholar
  16. Griffiths, M. (2013). Empowering citizens: A constructivist assessment of the impact of contextual and design factors on the concept of shared governance. In J. Ramon Gil-Garcia (Ed.), E-government success factors and measures: Concepts, theories, experiences, and practical recommendations (pp. 124–141). IGI: Hershey, Penn.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, B., & Zucker, S. (n.d.). Ambiglio Lorenzetti, Palazzo Pubblico frescoes: Allegory and effect of bad and bad government. Khan Academy. Retrieved December 3, 2015.
  18. Jacobs, K. (2014). Penn State University October 14, iBeacons give visitors to Palmer Museum of Art a customised experience. Retrieved on January 20, 2015.
  19. Kulturprojekte, Berlin. Retrieved February 3, 2016.
  20. Kulturprojekte, Berlin GmbH. (2013). Exhibition catalogue. In Van Dü|lman, M. Kühnelt, W., & Weigel, B. (Eds.), Diversity destroyed: Berlin 1933-1938-1945. A city remembers.Google Scholar
  21. Landry, C. (2014). Creative city index, Adelaide findings report. Retrieved on March 20, 2015.
  22. Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (2005). (curated) Atmospheres of democracy. ZKM Karlsruhe, 2005.Google Scholar
  23. Legge, K. (2010). Place making: An Australian perspective. Retrieved on February 2, 2015
  24. Lehman, M. (2005). Cronulla riots: Lebanese gang behaviour incites riot. Australian News Commentary, December 13, 2005. Retrieved on June 20, 2014.
  25. Luckham, D. (2014). Where history meets smart technology: Greenwich launches sound and vision scapes. Real Time Intelligence and Complex Event Processing. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
  26. Marr, B. (2015). How big data and the Internet of things improve public transport in London. Forbes, May 27, 2015. Retrieved May 30, 2015.
  27. Miles, S. (2015). Placefaking and disillusionment in the post-industrial city. In G. Barton and C. Courage (Eds.), Edge condition. January, 2015. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  28. Myers, R. (2016). Respect and civility in public discourse have evaporated with Brexit. The Guardian. June 27, 2016. Retrieved June 28, 2016.
  29. Peacock, D., and MacKenzie, J. (2014). Out of the archives and onto the streets: Creating digital and social experiences with heritage datasets. In Digital Humanities Australasia Conference, Perth, March 2014.Google Scholar
  30. Pew Research Internet Project. (2014). Internet of Things will Thrive by 2025. Retrieved on February 2, 2015.
  31. Reiser, M., and Clark, S. (2013). Locative media and situated learning. Digital Creativity, 24(3). doi: 10.1080/14626268.2013.813381. Retrieved on 2014
  32. Staff Reporter. (2016). Bishops call for return of “mutual respect and civility” after Brexit campaign. Catholic Herald. June 24, 2016. Retrieved December 20, 2016.
  33. Tebeau, M. (2013). Strategies for mobile interpretive projects for humanists and cultural organizations. White paper 18. National Endowment for the Humanities, March.Google Scholar
  34. Tourism Tasmania. (2014). Mona visitor profile, September 2014. Retrieved on October 30, 2014.
  35. Young, J. (2010). Germany’s Holocaust Memorial Problem and Mine, 19 April, 2006. Retrieved June 27, 2016.
  36. Young Turks. (2015). Fox News “no go zones” lies exposed by French TV show. Le Petit Journal, 16 January, 2015. Retrieved on January 30, 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Higher Education Press 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations