Skip to main content

Valuation of Flexibility Initiatives: A Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flexibility in Resource Management

Part of the book series: Flexible Systems Management ((FLEXSYS))

  • 934 Accesses

Abstract

The need for flexibility in organizations has been espoused by many researchers and professionals. Despite the felt need and real-life practice of diverse shades of flexibility, its valuation has not been adequately addressed. Though the flexibility initiatives help in fulfillment of strategic goals, these require capability development and thereby cost inputs for their realization. The benefits of flexibility define its worth, which in relation to the associated cost gives its value or affordability. Initially, the chapter gives an overview of different types of flexibility initiatives with real-life case examples. This chapter provides a conceptual framework for valuation of flexibility initiatives in terms of fulfillment of needs leading to benefits and the requirements of capability building for implementing these initiatives requiring cost inputs. The framework is illustrated by few examples such as variable capacity, multiskilling, and flexi-time/flexi-place. It compares the flexibility initiatives using interpretive ranking process (IRP) and Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (TISM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, L., & Pantzalis, C. (1996). Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppink, D. J. (1978). Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Range Planning, 11(4), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka, N. (1993). The value of flexibility: The case of a dual—Fuel industrial steam boiler. Financial Management, 22(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-H., & Makhija, M. (2009). Flexibility in internationalization: Is it valuable during an economic crisis? Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. P. (1984). Valuing financial flexibility, NBER Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkhofer, M. W. (1977). The value of information given decision flexibility. Management Science, 23(7), 716–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober, F., & Gebauer, J. (2009). How much to spend on flexibility? Determining the value of information system flexibility. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, California, August 6th–9th 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. K., Sushil and Jain, P. K. (2010). Revisiting Flexibility in Organizations: Exploring its Impact on Performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(3), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (1997). Flexible systems management—An evolving paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(4), 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2009). Interpretive ranking process. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012a). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012b). Making flowing stream strategy work. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012c). Flexibility maturity model: Possibilities and directions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2012d). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2013). Flowing stream strategy: Leveraging strategic change with continuity. New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2014). The concept of a flexible enterprise. In Sushil & E. A. Stohr (Eds.), The flexible enterprise, Flexible Systems Management (pp. 3–26). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2015a). Strategic flexibility: The evolving paradigm of strategic management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2015b). Diverse shades of flexibility and agility in business. In Sushil & G. Chroust (Eds.), Systemic flexibility and business agility, Flexible Systems Management (pp. 3–19). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2015c). Valuation of flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(3), 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2016a). Managing flexibility: Developing a framework of flexibility maturity model. In Sushil, K. T. Bhal, & S. P. Singh (Eds.), Managing flexibility: People, process, technology and business, Flexible Systems Management (pp. 3–19). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2016b). Theory of flexible systems management. In Sushil, J. Connel, & J. Burgess (Eds.), Flexible work organizations: The challenges of capacity building in Asia, Flexible Systems Management (pp. 3–20). New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2016c). How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3

  • Sushil. (2017). Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework. Production Planning and Control,  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1336794.

  • Triantis, A. J., & Hodder, J. E. (1990). Valuing flexibility as a complex option. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sushil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sushil (2018). Valuation of Flexibility Initiatives: A Conceptual Framework. In: Sushil, Singh, T., Kulkarni, A. (eds) Flexibility in Resource Management. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4888-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics