Advertisement

Young Children’s Participation in a New Language Context: A Synthesising Analysis for a Holistic Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates young children’s participation in early childhood education (ECE) from a holistic perspective. Participation through non-verbal and verbal actions in interaction, with teachers and other children, and/or in different activities, including toys and materials, is in focus. In participating in social practices, young children use their communicative experiences at the same time as they make new ones. This happens at times in a language context where communication is carried out in a, for them, new language. When we in this chapter write about communicative experiences used and made, we refer to speech as well as non-verbal communication: verbal and non-verbal actions that are expressed by young children and/or other participants in childcare activities. In the nature of our argument, we suggest that analysing young children’s participation sheds light on their conditions for learning in ECE.

References

  1. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. (2013). Engagerade i världens bästa? Lärande för hållbarhet i förskolan. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  2. Dalli, C. (1999). Starting childcare before three: Narrative of experiences. A three-partite focus. Victoria University of Wellington, PhD these. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/478
  3. Dalli, C. (2003). Learning in the social environment: Cameos from two children’s experiences of starting childcare. European early childhood education research monograph. Themed monograph series no. 1, 87–98.Google Scholar
  4. Degotardi, S., & Davis, B. (2008). Understanding infants: Characteristics of early childhood practitioners’ interpretations of infants and their behaviours. Early Years, 28(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eide, B., Os, E., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2012). Små barns medvirkning i samlingsstunder. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 5(49), 1–21.Google Scholar
  6. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasselgren, B. (1981). Ways of apprehending children at play. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  8. Hedegaard, M. (2009). Children’s development from a cultural- historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hundeide, K. (2006). Sociokulturella ramar och barns utveckling. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  10. Johansson, E. (2011). Möten för lärande. Pedagogisk verksamhet för de yngsta barnen i förskolan. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  11. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalliala, M. (2014). Toddlers as both more and less competent social actors in Finnish day care centres. Early Years, 34(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kultti, A. (2015). Adding learning resources: A study of two toddlers’ modes and trajectories of participation in early childhood education. International Journal of Early Years Education. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2015.1018147.
  14. Kultti, A. (in press). Go Edvin! Pedagogical structuring of activities to support toddler participation in an early child care programme. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7, 215.Google Scholar
  15. Kultti, A., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2016a). Investing in home-preschool collaboration for understanding social words of multilingual children. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 5(1), 69–91.Google Scholar
  16. Kultti, A., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2016b). Toys and the creation of cultural play scripts. In D. Pike, C. a’Beckett, & S. Lynch (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on play from early childhood and beyond. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Kultti, A., & Pramling, N. (2014). Bring your own toy: Socialisation through tool-mediated activities in an early childhood education context. Early Childhood Education Journal. doi: 10.1007/s10643-014-0662-5.
  18. Kultti, A., & Pramling, N. (2015). Limes and lemons: Teaching and learning in preschool as the coordination of perspectives and sensory modalities. International Journal of Early Childhood., 47(1), 105–117. doi: 10.1007/s13158-015-0130-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindahl, M. (1996). Inlärning och erfarande. Ettåringars möte med förskolans värld. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  21. Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2016). What is the future of sustainability in early childhood? In A. Farrell, S. L. Kagan, & E. K. M. Tisdall (Eds.), Sage handbook of early childhood research (pp. 502–516). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations: A new model in decision-making, in line with Article 12.1 of the United Nations Convention on the rights of the child. Children & Society, 15, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singer, E., & de Haan, D. (2007). The social lives of young children: Play, conflicts and moral learning in day-care groups. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
  25. Venninen, T., Leinonen, J., Lipponen, L., & Ojala, M. (2014). Supporting children’s participation in Finnish child care centers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wong-Fillmore, L. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In C. J. Fillmore et al. (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and behavior (pp. 203–228). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Swedish National Centre for Research on Learning and New TechnologiesGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations