Skip to main content

Lethal Means Restriction: Historical, International, and Professional Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Over 800,000 completed suicides occur globally each year. Impulsivity and preference for one lethal method over another often characterize suicide attempts. Politics, cultural acceptability, and economic factors of a given region play an important role in an individual’s lethal means selection. Obtaining information on a given patient’s likelihood to use a particular means can provide a vital advantage to a clinician’s risk assessment and safety planning efforts. Importantly, research has shown that lethal means preferences vary around the world. Although some methods have been used throughout the history of suicidal behaviour, new methods continue to emerge and levels of frequency for specific means vary globally. Specifically, methods gaining in popularity include self-poisoning and self-immolation. The ever-changing nature of lethal means frequencies compiled with the efficacy of informed safety planning suggests the need for continued research into lethal means restriction so that professionals can adequately assess and intervene during behavioural emergencies. This chapter will provide the clinician with an overview on current lethal means restriction data to better-inform risk assessment procedures for patients from diverse backgrounds. Further, current limitations in lethal means research as well as future directions will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Using firearms as an example demonstrating the differences among these three methods of means restriction, physically preventing access would involve removing a firearm from an individual's possession; reducing lethality of certain means could include installing a gunlock or not having access to ammunition; reducing cognitive access would involve providing mental health treatment and means restriction counseling preventing planning harm by using the firearm.

  2. 2.

    See discussion regarding the Method Substitution Hypothesis.

  3. 3.

    Many states have strengthened the federal regulations. The federal laws pertaining to firearm ownership provides the bare minimum for state regulation. Unless developing legislation or intervention at a federal level, always investigate state-specific regulations before engaging in means restriction.

References

  • Ajdacic-Gross, V., Weiss, M. G., Ring, M., Hepp, U., Bopp, M., Gutzwiller, F., & Rossler, W. (2008). Methods of suicide: International suicide patterns derived from the WHO mortality database. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(9), 726–732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • American Knife & Tool Institute. (n.d.). The American Knife & Tool Institute Supports Knife Preemption Laws to Protect Law-Abiding Citizens. Retrieved from http://www.akti.org/legislation/about-knife-preemption/.

  • Anestis, M. D. (2016). Prior suicide attempts are less common in suicide decedents who died by firearms relative to those who died by other means. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189, 106–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, C. W., & Miller, M. J. (2014). Reducing a suicidal person’s access to lethal means of suicide. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 47(3), 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beautrais, A. L. (2008). Effectiveness of barriers at suicide jumping sites: A case study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35(5), 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M. E., Miller, M., Barber, C., Miller, I., Sullivan, A. F., Camargo, C. A., & Boudreaux, E. D. (2013). Lethal means restriction for suicide prevention: Beliefs and behaviours of emergency department providers. Depression and Anxiety, 30(10), 1013–1020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. (1993). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-103hr1025enr/pdf/BILLS-103hr1025enr.pdf.

  • Bryan, C. J., Stone, S. L., & Rudd, D. M. (2011). A practical, evidence-based approach for means-restriction counseling with suicidal patients. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(5), 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. S., Lu, T. H., Sterne, J. A. C., Eddleston, M., Lin, J. J., & Gunnell, D. (2012). The impact of pesticide suicide on the geographic distribution of suicide in Taiwan: A spatial analysis. BMC Public Health, 12, 260–270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Child-Access Prevention. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/65.

  • Clarke, R. V. (1989). Crime as opportunity: A note on domestic gas suicide in Britain and The Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology, Delinquency and Deviant Social Behaviour, 29(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custodial Sentences and Weapons Act. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2007/17/contents.

  • Daigle, M. S. (2005). Suicide prevention through means restriction: Assessing the risk of substitution: A critical review and synthesis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(4), 625–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drum, D. J., Brownson, C., Denmark, A. B., & Smith, S. E. (2009). New data on the nature of suicidal crises in college students: Shifting the paradigm. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, M. (2000). Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 93(11), 715–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Gun Control Act of 1968. (1968). Public Law 90–618. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-82/pdf/STATUTE-82-Pg1213-2.pdf.

  • Frattaroli, S., McGinty, E. E., Barnhorst, A., & Greenberg, S. (2015). Gun violence restraining orders: Alternative or adjunct to mental health-based restrictions on firearms? Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 33(2–3), 290–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacco, D., & Prieve, S. (2016). Suicidality and hostility following involuntary hospital treatment. PLoS ONE, 11(5), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, D. C., Mueller, B. A., Riedy, C., Dowd, M. D. Villaveces, A., Prodzinski, J., … Haruff, R. (2005). Gun storage practices and risk of youth suicide and unintentional firearm injuries. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 293(6) 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnel, D., & Eddleston, M. (2003). Suicide by intentional ingestion of pesticides: A continuing tragedy in developing countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 32(6), 902–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell, D., Eddleston, M., Phillips, M. R., & Konradsen, F. (2007). The global distribution of fatal pesticide self-poisoning: Systematic review. BMC Public Health, 7(1), 357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnel, D., Middleton, N., & Frankel, S. (2000). Method availability and the prevention of suicide---A re-analysis of secular trends in England and Wales 1950–1975. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 35(10), 437–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. (2016). Means reduction saves lives. Retrieved from http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/saves-lives/.

  • Hawton, K. (2002). United Kingdom legislation on pack sizes of analgesics: Background, rationale, and effects on suicide and deliberate self-harm. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 32(3), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, J., Grilley, A., & Ward, K. (2016). Preventing gun violence. In L. H. Gold & R. I. Simon (Eds.), Gun violence and mental illness (pp. 317–338). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. M., Frank, E. M., Ciocca, M., & Barber, C. W. (2011). Training mental healthcare providers to reduce at-risk patients’ access to lethal means of suicide: Evaluation of the CALM Project. Archives of Suicide Research, 15(3), 259–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knives Act. (1997). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/21/crossheading/stopping-and-searching.

  • Krietman, N. (1976). The coal gas story: United Kingdom suicide rates, 1960–1971. British Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine, 30(2), 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. (2012). Universal Background Checks & the Private Sale Loophole Policy Summary. Retrieved from http://smartgunlaws.org/universal-gun-background-checks-policy-summary/#footnote_33_5949.

  • Lester, D. (1988). Why do people choose particular methods for suicide? Activitas Nervosa Superior, 30(4), 312–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. J., & Lu, T. H. (2011). Trends in solids/liquids poisoning suicide rates in Taiwan: A test of the substitution hypothesis. BMC Public Health, 11, 712–719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Madge, N., Hewitt, A., De Wilde, E. J., Corcoran, P., Fekete, S., Van Heeringen, K., … Ystgaard, M. (2008). Deliberate self-harm within an international community sample of young people: Comparative findings from the Child & Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(6), 6667–6677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi, T., Sawada, Y., & Ueda, M. (2013). Does the installation of blue lights on train platforms prevent suicide? A before-and-after observational study from Japan. Journal of Affective Disorders, 147(1–3), 385–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishara, B. L. (2007). Railway and metro suicides: Understanding the problem and prevention potential. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 28(S1), 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. (2014). A prioritized research agenda for suicide prevention: An action plan to save lives. Retrieved from http://actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/sites/actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/files/Agenda.pdf.

  • Owens, D., Horrocks, J., & House, A. (2002). Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 181(3), 193–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirkis, J., Too, L. S., Spittal, M. J., Krysinska, K., Robinson, J., & Cheung, Y. T. D. (2015). Interventions to reduce suicides at suicide hotspots: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(11), 994–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. (2005). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-109s397enr/pdf/BILLS-109s397enr.pdf.

  • Renzetti, C. M., & Edleson, J. L. (2008). Encyclopedia of interpersonal violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. A., Franke, T. M., Bastian, A. M., Sor, S., & Halfon, N. (2000). Firearm storage patterns in US homes with children. American Journal of Public Health, 90(4), 588–594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Switchblade Knife Act. (1958). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title15/html/USCODE-2011-title15-chap29.htm.

  • Spicer, R. S., & Miller, T. R. (2000). Suicide acts in 8 states: Incidence and case fatality rates by demographics and method. American Journal of Public Health, 90(12), 1885–1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime. (2013). Global study on homicide 2013: Trends, Context, Data. Retrieved from http://www.unodc.org/documents/gsh/.

  • US Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). Results from the 2013 national survey on drug use and health: Mental Health Findings. Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHmhfr2013/NSDUHmhfr2013.pdf.

  • Violent Crime Reduction Act. (2006). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/38/section/66#.

  • World Health Organization. (2006). Pesticides are a leading suicide method. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2006/np24/en/.

  • World Health Organization. (2009). Guns, knives and pesticides: Reducing access to lethal means. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/lethal.pdf.

  • World Health Organization. (2014). Suicide, fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs398/en/.

  • Yip, P. S., Caine, E., Yousuf, S., Chang, S. S., Chien-Chang Wu, K., & Chen, Y. Y. (2012). Means restriction for suicide prevention. The Lancet, 379(9834), 2393–2399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Bongar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bongar, B., Lockwood, D., Spangler, D., Cowell, W. (2017). Lethal Means Restriction: Historical, International, and Professional Considerations. In: Kumar, U. (eds) Handbook of Suicidal Behaviour. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4816-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics