Skip to main content

Prediction of Hot Spots in Dimer Interface of Green Fluorescent Protein

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Applied Biotechnology (ICAB 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 444))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Wild-type green fluorescent protein (GFP) has a weak dimerization tendency at higher concentrations. Currently there are still a limited number of known mutated residues for the dimer interface breaking. The crystal structure of the dimer provides vital background on neighbouring residue interactions. Here well-established hot spot prediction methods, such as HotPoint, KFC2, PredHS and Robetta, were adopted to predict residues critical for dimer stabilization, i.e. hot spots. Among 17 residues appeared on the dimer interface of GFP, 10 residues were predicted as hot spots by at least one method. Some of these computational hot spots were verified with existing site-directed mutagenesis results, and the remains of the predicted residues can be candidates for further validation. Furthermore, the structural feature such as relative accessibility was found significantly different between computational hot spots and non-hot spots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shimomura O, Johnson FH, Saiga Y (1962) Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, Aequorea. J Cell Comp Physiol 59:223–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G et al (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263(5148):802–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pédelacq JD, Cabantous S, Tran T et al (2006) Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 24(9):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S (1996) FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173(1):33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang F, Moss LG, Phillips GN (1996) The molecular structure of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 14(10):1246–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kortemme T, Baker D (2002) A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(22):14116–14121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thorn KS, Bogan AA (2001) ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions. Bioinformatics 17(3):284–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer TB, Arunachalam KV, Bailey D et al (2003) The binding interface database (BID): a compilation of amino acid hot spots in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 19(11):1453–1454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang L, Liu ZP, Zhang XS et al (2012) Prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces using a random forest model with hybrid features. Protein Eng Des Sel 25(3):119–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Zhang W, Gao Q et al (2014) Prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces using extreme learning machines with the information of spatial neighbour residues. IET Syst Biol 8(4):184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tuncbag N, Keskin O, Gursoy A (2010) HotPoint: hot spot prediction server for protein interfaces. Nucl Acids Res 38(Web Server issue):W402–W406

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu X, Mitchell J (2011) KFC2: a knowledge-based hot spot prediction method based on interface solvation, atomic density, and plasticity features. Proteins 79(9):2671–2683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng L, Zhang QC, Chen Z et al (2014) PredHS: a web server for predicting protein-protein interaction hot spots by using structural neighborhood properties. Nucl Acids Res 42(Web Server issue):W290–W295

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC et al (2002) Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296(5569):913–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31370075 and 61603273), Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (14JCQNJC00300 and 16JCYBJC18500), Tianjin University of Science and Technology (2014CXLG28), and Tianjin Foreign Studies University (13QN15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, W., Wang, L., Sun, Z., Zhang, B., Tang, Q., Gao, Q. (2018). Prediction of Hot Spots in Dimer Interface of Green Fluorescent Protein. In: Liu, H., Song, C., Ram, A. (eds) Advances in Applied Biotechnology. ICAB 2016. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 444. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4801-2_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics