Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lauer MS, Krumholz HM, Topol EJ. Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research? Lancet. 2015;386:2447–9.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 6]; Available from: http://publicationethics.org/resources/
Babalola O, Grant-Kels JM, Parish LC. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30:231–6.
Gollogly L, Momen H. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors. Rev Saúde Pública 2006;40 Spec no.:24–29.
Benos DJ, Fabres J, Farmer J, Gutierrez JP, Hennessy K, Kosek D, et al. Ethics and scientific publication. Adv Physiol Educ. 2005;29:59–74.
Davidoff F, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Hoey J, Højgaard L, Horton R, et al. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. JAMA. 2001;286:1232–4.
Shea JA, Caelleigh AS, Pangaro L, Steinecke A. Review process and publication decision. Nurs Open. 2001;76:911–21.
Yank V, Rennie D. Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:661–70.
Ilakovac V, Fister K, Marusic M, Marusic A. Reliability of disclosure forms of authors’ contributions. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;176:41–6.
Editorial policy committee. CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 update [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 6]; Available from: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/
Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A. Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2007;152:1–26.
Jordan K. Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: Reflections and implications for practice [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 6]; Available from: http://ascw.know-center.tugraz.at/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ASCW15_jordan_response_kraker-lex.pdf
Arnetminer [Internet]. 2005. Available from: https://cn.aminer.org
Chattopadhyay A. Ethics of scientific publication: (Mal)-practices and Consequentialism [Internet]. IEEE; 2014 [cited 2016 Aug 6]. p. 1–5. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6893451
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Case Scenario (Handling Plagiarism)
Case Scenario (Handling Plagiarism)
The editor in chief of a reputed journal gets an email communication regarding plagiarized content in one of the original articles published in the recent issues of the journal. The reader mentions that most of the content has been copied from an article published in another reputed journal of the same specialty. As an editor,
-
1.
How will you proceed further and handle this issue?
-
2.
What is the impact of such issues to the journal and to the society?
-
3.
What preventive action would you incorporate to avoid such issues in future?
-
4.
Are there any recommendations/guidelines which are to be followed while encountering such issues?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parija, S.C., Mandal, J., Poonambath, D.K., Halder, A. (2017). Ethical Dilemmas and Etiquettes of Scientific Publication. In: Parija, S., Kate, V. (eds) Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4719-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4720-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)