Skip to main content

Material Selection and Performance in Oil and Gas Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Metallurgy and Corrosion Control

Part of the book series: Indian Institute of Metals Series ((IIMS))

Abstract

In oil and gas production, the main corrosive constituent is CO2 and corrosion rate increases initially with increase in its partial pressure and temperature and then decreases beyond a temperature due to film formation. The rate is also affected by characteristic of produced water, flow rate, oil/water ratio, oxygen, etc. Number of predictive models have been developed which have been classified as mechanistic or empirical. However, the prediction under different models quite often varies. Carbon steel with inhibitor addition is the preferred MOC, but corrosion-resistant alloys (CRA) like 13 Cr, DSS, SDSS and nickel alloys are used depending on severity. Coated or CRA-cladded carbon steels are also being used. In presence of H2S, the materials are susceptible to cracking for which resistant alloys are used. Handling of gas involves drying followed by separation of different constituents. All lines and offshore structures are protected against external corrosion by coating and CP. This chapter presents various aspects of problem experienced and action taken in oil and gas industry to increase the performance of materials. Emphasis has been on the offshore oil and gas installations, where the conditions are more severe and cost of operation and maintenance much higher than similar installation onshore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. (1958) Corrosion of oil-and gas-well equipment. API-NACE Publication

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kane RD (1996) Relevance of laboratory corrosion test in corrosion assessment and material selection case study. In: Shalaby HM (ed) Industrial corrosion and corrosion control technology. KISR, Kuwait, pp 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Waard C, Lotz U, Milliams DE (1991) Predictive model for CO2 corrosion engineering in wet natural gas pipelines. Corrosion 47(12), December 1991, Fig. 1, page 978; Fig. 2, page 977

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crolet JL (1994) Which CO2 corrosion, hence which prediction? In: Predicting CO2 corrosion in the oil and gas industry. European Federation of Corrosion Publication no. 13, Institute of Materials, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Waard C, Milliams DE (1975) Prediction of carbonic acid corrosion in natural gas pipelines. In: First international conference on the internal and external corrosion of pipes, Paper F1, UK

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Waard C, Milliams DE (1975) Corrosion 31:131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nešić S (2007) Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines—a review. Corros Sci 49:4308–4338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith SN, Pacheco JL (2002) Prediction of corrosion in slightly sour environments. Corrosion 02, Paper No. 2241

    Google Scholar 

  9. Private Communication with Capasnta SD (1994) Quoted in corrosion in petrochemical industry. In: Gaveric L (ed) ASM International, p 289

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nyborg R, Status on CO2 corrosion prediction document. Institute for Energy Technology, 2008–2009

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bonis M, Crolet JC (1987) Practical aspects of the influence of in-situ pH on H2S induced cracking. Corros Sci 27(10/11): 1059–1070

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nafday OA, Nesic S (2005) Iron carbonate scale formation in the presence of acetic acid. Corrosion, Paper No. 5295

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kermani MB, Morshed A (2003) Carbon dioxide corrosion in oil and gas production—a compendium. Corrosion 59(8):659–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, George K, Nesić S (2004) High pressure CO2 corrosion electrochemistry and the effect of acetic acid. Corrosion, Paper No. 375

    Google Scholar 

  15. George K, Wang S, Nešić S, de Waard C (2004) Modeling of CO2 corrosion of mild steel at high partial pressures of CO2 and in the presence of acetic acid. Corrosion, Paper No. 623

    Google Scholar 

  16. Efird KD (1995) Petroleum testing in corrosion tests and standards, application and interpretation. In: Baboian R (ed) ASTM, pp 350–358

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Waard C, Smith L, Craig BD (2001) The influence of crude oil on well tubing corrosion rates. EUROCORR

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cai J, Nesic S, de Waard C (2004) Modeling of water wetting in oil-water pipe flow. Corrosion, Paper No 04663

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pots BFM, John RC, Rippon IJ, Thomas MJJS, Kapusta SD, Girgis MM, Whitham T (2002) Improvements on de Waard—Milliams corrosion prediction and applications to corrosion management. Corrosion, Paper No. 02235

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tang X, Li C, Ayello F, Cai J, Nesic S, Ivan C, Cruz T, Al-Khamis JN (2007) Effect of oil type on phase wetting transition and corrosion in oil-water flow. Corrosion, Paper No. 07170

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilhelm SM, McArthur A Removal and treatment of mercury contamination at gas processing plant, society of petroleum engineers, (SPE No. 29721)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sainal MR, Shafawi A, Jabar Ir. AM, Mercury removal system for upstream application: experience in treating mercury from raw condensate research literature. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-106610

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wongkasemjit S, Wasantakorn A, Laboratory study of corrosion effect of dimethyl-mercury on natural gas processing equipment. J Corr Sci Eng 1, Paper 12

    Google Scholar 

  24. NACE Standard MR0175, Metals for sulphide stress cracking and stress corrosion cracking resistance in sour oilfield environments

    Google Scholar 

  25. International Standard NACE MR0175/ISO15156—Petroleum and natural gas industries—materials for use in H2S-containing environments in oil and gas production and stress corrosion cracking in H2S environments

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kittel J, Smanio V, Fregonese M, Garnier L, Lefebvre X (2010) Hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) testing of low alloy steel in sour environment: impact of time of exposure on the extent of damage. Corros Sci 52(4):1386–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nyborg R (2010) CO2 corrosion models for oil and gas production system. Corrosion, Paper No 10371

    Google Scholar 

  28. Obuka NSP, Ikwu ONC, Chukwumuanya GRO, Okechukwu E, (2012) Review of corrosion kinetics and thermodynamics of CO2 and H2S corrosion effects and associated prediction/evaluation on oil and gas pipeline system. Int J Sci Technol Res 1(4):156–162

    Google Scholar 

  29. Report No IFE/KR/E—2009/003 Guidelines for Prediction of CO2corrosion in oil and gas industry

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gunaltun YM, Supriyataman D, Jumakludin A, Top of the line corrosion in multiphase gas line: a case history. Corrosion/99, Paper No. 36

    Google Scholar 

  31. Singer M, Nesic S (2004) Top of the line corrosion in presence of acetic acid and carbondioxide. Corrosion, Paper No. 04377

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dugstad A, Lunde L, Nesic S (1994) Corrosion of internal corrosion of multiphase oil and gas line. In: Prevention of pipeline corrosion conference, Houston, October 1994

    Google Scholar 

  33. API 5CT Specification for Casing And Tubing (US Customary Units)

    Google Scholar 

  34. NACE Standard RP0186—Application of Cathodic Protection for External Surfaces of Steel Well Casings

    Google Scholar 

  35. NORSOK Standard M001-Material Selection

    Google Scholar 

  36. Edmonds DV, Cochrane RC The effect of alloying on the resistance of carbon steel for oilfield applications to CO2 corrosion. Mat Res 8(4), Sao Carlos, Oct./Dec. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  37. Craig B (2008) Materials for deep oil and gas well Construction. Adv Mat Process 33–35

    Google Scholar 

  38. What is Current Industry Standard Practice for Welding Super-martensitic Stainless Steels? TWI, FEQ. www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/material-faqs/faq-what-is-current-industry-standard

  39. Smith L (2012) Engineering with clad steel, 2nd edn, pp. 1–23. www.nickelinstitute.or

  40. Berg B, Schnaut U (2009) A new production method for CRA lined steel pipe based on sheet metal. In: 4th pipeline technology conference, Hannover, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  41. Macrae C (2008) One Pipe or Two? Manufacturing clad pipe for energy application. The Tube And Pipe Journal, June 2008. http://www.thefabricator.com/article/hydroforming/one-pipe-or-twor

  42. ISO/CD 21457 Materials Selection and Corrosion Control for Oil and Gas Production Systems

    Google Scholar 

  43. BS EN ISO 21457:2010, Petroleum Petrochemical and Natural Gas Industries. Material selection and corrosion control for oil and gas production systems

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mcdonnell MR (2006) liquid applied internal flow coatings for oil transmission line. In: Pipeline technology conference 2006, Hannover, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee C-M, Jacob R, Morgan P, Weatherhead R (2007) International experience with CP of offshore pipelines and flowlines. TWI Report 17562/1/2007, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  46. Argent C, Norman D (2006) 3-layer polyolefin coating: fulfilling their potential. In: NACE corrosion conference

    Google Scholar 

  47. www.trelleborg.com/en/Hercules/Products-and-solutions/Offshore-Oil-and-Gas/Corrosion-Protection/

  48. Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipelines by Galvanic Anodes, DNV-RP-F103, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  49. Heier EB, Johansen RB, North sea failures of 13Cr flow lines, consequences for future application. https://sem.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/sem.org-SEM-X-Int-Cong-s024p03-North-Sea-Failures-13Cr-Flowlines-Consequences-Future-Application.pdf

  50. Recommended Practice—Det Norske Veritas, DNV-RP-B401, Cathodic Protection Design, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  51. ISO 15589-2:2004, Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries–Cathodic Protection of Pipeline Transportation Systems—Part 2: Offshore Pipelines

    Google Scholar 

  52. NORSOK Standard M-503, Cathodic Protection Edition 3, May 2007

    Google Scholar 

  53. ASTM E112 12-96 Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size

    Google Scholar 

  54. DNV-RP-F112—Design of Duplex Stainless Steel Subsea Equipment Exposed to Cathodic Protection, October, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  55. Britton J, Baxter RE (1999) The design and application of deep water offshore cathodic protection systems: some practical considerations. Corrosion 99. Source: Deepwater Technical Library.http://stoprust.com/technical-papers/24-cp-design-in-deep-water/

  56. API RP 15S API Qualification of Spoolable Reinforced Plastic Linepipe

    Google Scholar 

  57. Guideline for Selection of Instrument Tubing and Clamps for Offshore and Onshore Plants, Statoil Advisory Document, TD0101, Final Ver. 1, Valid From 2005-04-18

    Google Scholar 

  58. NACE SP 0108-2008 Corrosion Control of Offshore Structures by Protective Coatings

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schiroky G, Dam A, Okeremi A, Speed C (2013) Pitting and crevice corrosion of offshore stainless steel tubing. Offshore 73(5):122–125

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tungum Specification and Application Guide http://www.supertechnical.com/products_files/TUNGUMALLOY.pdf

  61. Oil and Gas Processing (Oil Section), Oil and Gas Processing,—Sharing Information in Oil and Gas Industry. http://oilandgasprocessing.blogspot.in/2009/02/oil-and-gas-processing-oil-section.html

  62. Natural gas processing with flow chart, Process Flow Sheet. http://processflowsheets.blogspot.in/2011/11/natural-gas-processing-with-flow-chart.html

  63. Natural Gas Dehydration System. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/20187082/Natural-Gas-Dehydration-System

  64. Sherik AM, Lewis AL, Rasheed AH, Jabran AS (2010) Effect of TEG on corrosion of carbon steel in H2S, CO2 and O2 environment. Corrosion, Paper No. 10188

    Google Scholar 

  65. Smart III JS, Roberts R (2006) Possible glycol corrosion in normally dry gas pipeline. Corrosion, Paper No. 06442

    Google Scholar 

  66. Marsh J, Teh T, Conflicting views: CO2 corrosion models, corrosion inhibitor availability philosophies, and the effect on subsea systems and pipeline design. SPE 109209

    Google Scholar 

  67. Controlling the Formation of Gas Hydrates (www. csiro.au)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Det Norske Veritas Offshore Standard DNV-OS-F101, “Submarine Pipeline Systems”—2000

    Google Scholar 

  69. Amine Gas Treating, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AmineTreating.png (This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. It is reproduced here under the same license and may be reused per CC licensing terms.)

  70. Rooney PC, DuPart MS, Bacon TR, Effect of heat stable salts on MDEA solution corrosivity, Part 1 and Part 2. Hydrocarbon Processing, March, 1996 and April 1997

    Google Scholar 

  71. Haws R (2001) Contaminants in amine gas treating. CCR Technologies Inc, GPA Houston Regional Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  72. Technical Article: Gas Sweetening, Dow, Reprint: Printed 1998

    Google Scholar 

  73. API RP-945 Avoiding Environmental Cracking in Amine Units

    Google Scholar 

  74. API TASK GROUP: RP-945 Avoiding Environmental Cracking in Amine Units

    Google Scholar 

  75. Powell C, Michels H, Review of splash zone corrosion and bio-fouling of C70600 sheathed steel during 20 years exposure. CDA Inc

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rasmussen SN, Corrosion protection of offshore structures. (www.scribd.com/doc/128612529/Corrosion-Protection-of-Offshore-Structures) Hempel A/S, Denmark

  77. OSNA 10®, Copper Nickel Sheathing on Offshore Structures, KME Germany.http://www.copper.org/applications/marine/cuni/pdf/pros_KupferNickel_8S_100315_GB.pdf

  78. Hammond FW (2005) Twenty year results of long term copper nickel sheathed piling studies. Final Report ICA Project 358. June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  79. The Alexander L. Kielland accident, Report of a Norwegian Public Commission appointed by Royal Decree of March 28, 1980, presented to the Ministry of Justice and Police March, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  80. CEPA (2007) Stress corrosion cracking—recommended practice, 2nd edn. Canadian Energy Pipeline Association

    Google Scholar 

  81. Beavers JA, Thompson NG (2006) External corrosion of oil and gas pipelines. In: Cramer SD, Covino Jr BS (eds) Corrosion: environments and industries, Volume 13C. ASM Handbook

    Google Scholar 

  82. Baker Jr. M, Stress Corrosion Cracking Study, Final Report. TTO No 8, Integrity Management Program, Delivery Order DTRS56-02-D-70036

    Google Scholar 

  83. Britton J (2011) The role of cathodic protection in offshore pipeline integrity. Pipeline Integrity, November 2011 (From Hart’s Pipeline Digest, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  84. POF Specification and Requirements for Intelligent Pig Inspection of Pipelines, Version 3.2, January 2005

    Google Scholar 

  85. Palmer J, Hennig T (2012) Corrosion growth analysis—case study Of MFL-UT combined inspection. In: 7th pipeline technology conference, March 28–30, 2012, Hannover, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amiya Kumar Lahiri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lahiri, A.K. (2017). Material Selection and Performance in Oil and Gas Industry. In: Applied Metallurgy and Corrosion Control . Indian Institute of Metals Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4684-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics