Abstract
This chapter reviews the literature of AD determinants and the effects of AD implementation. We intensively analyze Mexico’s AD use, as it is the most frequent AD user in the world. We describe the evolution of the institutional and legislative system of the Mexican AD law, specifically, the Mexican legal and administrative background in AD policies. We also analyze the different patterns of Mexico’s AD implementation against China and other major targeted countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The original name is Unidad de Prácticas Comerciales Internacionales in Spanish.
- 2.
SE was formerly called the Ministry of Commerce and Industrial Development (SECOFI) prior to December 1, 2000.
References
Aggarwal, A. (2004). Macroeconomic determinants of antidumping: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. World Development, 32(6), 1043–1057.
Baldwin, R. E. (1984). Trade policy, income, and employment. NBER Working Paper.
Bergsten, C. F., & Williamson, J. (1983). Exchange rates and trade policy. In W. R. Cline (Ed.), Trade policy in the 1980s. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Blonigen, B. A., Prusa, T. J. (2008). Antidumping. Handbook of international trade. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Bown, C. P. (2008). The WTO and antidumping in developing countries. Economics and Politics, 20(2), 255–288.
Feinberg, R. M. (1989). Exchange rates and “unfair trade”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4), 704–707.
Feinberg, R. M. (2005). U.S. antidumping enforcement and macroeconomic indicators revisited: Do petitioners learn? Review of World Economics, 141(4), 612–622.
Francois, J. F., Niels, G. (2003). Business cycles, the current account and administered protection in Mexico. CEPR Discussion Paper.
Francois, J. F., Niels, G. (2004). Political influence in a new anti-dumping Regime: Evidence from Mexico. Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1997). Trade wars and trade talks. Trade and tax policy, inflation and exchange rates. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Irwin, D. A. (2005). The rise of us anti-dumping activity in historical perspective. World Economy, 5(31), 651–668.
Knetter, M. M., & Prusa, T. J. (2003). Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: Evidence from four countries. Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 1–17.
Messerlin, P. A. (2004). China in the world trade organization: Antidumping and safeguards. World Bank Economic Review, 18(1), 105–130.
Moore, M. O. (1992). Rules or politics? An empirical analysis of ITC anti-dumping decisions. Economic Inquiry, 30(3), 449–466.
Moore, M. O. (2006). U.S. facts-available AD decisions: An empirical analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(3), 639–652.
Niels, G., & Francois, J. (2006). Business cycles, the exchange rate, and demand for antidumping protection in Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 10(3), 388–399.
Niels, G., & Kate, A. T. (2004). Anti-dumping protection in a liberalising country: Mexico’s anti-dumping policy and practice. World Economy, 27(7), 967–983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00637.x.
Rinaldi-Larribe, M., Lightfoot, W. S., & Zhao, Z. (2013). Does china deserve the market economy status? Journal of Chinese Economic & Foreign Trade Studies, 2(2), 110–120.
Staiger, R. W., Wolak, F. A., Litan, R. E., Katz, M. L., & Waverman, L. (1994). Measuring industry specific protection: Antidumping in the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics, 26(1), 51–118.
Tharakan, P. K. M. (1995). Political economy and contingent protection. Economic Journal, 105(433), 1550–1564.
World Bank. (2015). Global Antidumping Database. http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTPROGRAMS/EXTTRADERESEARCH/0,,contentMDK:22571408~pagePK:64168182~piPK:64168060~theSitePK:544849,00.html. Accessed 26 October 2016.
WTO. (1998). Trade policy review Mexico: Report by the secretariat, World Trade Organization.
Zeng, K. (2010). Multilateral versus bilateral and regional trade liberalization: Explaining china’s pursuit of free trade agreements (FTAS). Journal of Contemporary China, 19(66), 635–652.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, Y., Zhao, L. (2017). AD Uses in Mexico. In: Sino-Mexican Trade Relations. SpringerBriefs in Economics(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4660-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4660-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4659-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4660-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)