Skip to main content

Promoting Higher-Level Thinking Skills in University Business and Human Resource Courses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
English as a Medium of Instruction in Higher Education

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 8))

  • 1946 Accesses

Abstract

There is considerable debate in countries where the students speak the same native language about the effects of using English to teach academic subject matter. On the one hand, it is argued that by studying their subjects in English, students can improve their English vocabulary and communicative fluency and can, at the same time, become more competitive in the global marketplace. On the other hand, concerns are expressed that when they are required to teach their subject matter in English, lecturers may have to cut back on the amount of content that they can cover and that students have difficulty understanding the concepts as well as if they studied the subject in their own language, that students don’t learn as much, and that the challenge of both learning English and the subject matter can negatively affect student motivation.

This chapter explores the idea that the use of higher-order thinking skills in a course of instruction, as described in Bloom’s taxonomy, can have a positive effect on student motivation and that both lecturers and students will find that not only does the content of the course not have to be curtailed but that it is learned well and students also experience an improvement in their communicative English language skills even without direct instruction in English. The case study in this chapter examines two content courses offered in a prestigious Taiwanese university; these courses—one in compensation management and another in branding—have built higher-order thinking skills into their curricular design. Student responses to a questionnaire in each course were examined to determine the degree to which the students felt that their English competency improved, whether they felt they had learned more or less because the medium of instruction was English and whether they believed it was worth the effort to study subject area content using English as the medium of instruction. In student focus group interviews, students’ responses to the use of higher-order thinking skills were examined in each course, including the effect which higher-order thinking skills had on content learning and on improvements in communicative English. The result is largely affirmative. Recommended strategies for integrating higher-level thinking skills into learning environments are reviewed here, and ways to expand the repertoire of teaching strategies used by English-medium instruction (EMI) lecturers are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bloom, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook i: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, W. (2012). Higher-order thinking skills to develop 21 st century learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education Publishing, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowl, T. K., Kaminsky, S., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Educational psychology: Windows on teaching. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1994). Knowledge, power, and identity in teaching English as a second language. In F. Genesee (Ed.), Educating second language children (pp. 33–58). New York: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y. (2004). Teaching language and content to linguistically and culturally diverse students: Principles, ideas, and materials. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. D., & Miller, K. B. (2013). Classroom instruction that works with English language learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B., Schall, M., & Scheibel, A. (1993). A quantitative dendritic analysis of Wernicke’s area in humans: Gender, hemispheric, and environmental factors. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 327(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2012). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (4th Global ed.). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, F. J., Rohani, F., & Goodson, L. (1997). Higher-order thinking skills. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. A. (2014). Compensation (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrow, S. (2005). HOTS revisited: A thinking development approach to reducing the learning gap after grade 3. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, J., Yuen, S., Ramey, D., & Pasta, D. (1991). Final Report: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early exit and late-exit bilingual education programs for language minority children. (Vol. I) (Prepared for U.S. Department of Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riazi, A. M., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian high-school and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirotnik, K. (1983). What you see is what you get—consistency, persistency, and mediocrity in classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Jeremy Sykes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sykes, C.J., Wu, SM. (2017). Promoting Higher-Level Thinking Skills in University Business and Human Resource Courses. In: Tsou, W., Kao, SM. (eds) English as a Medium of Instruction in Higher Education. English Language Education, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4645-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4645-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4644-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4645-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics