Advertisement

Interactional Skills in Engineering Education

  • Wenli TsouEmail author
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 8)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how interaction can be encouraged in engineering courses. To many educators in Taiwan, EMI and non-EMI teachers alike, interactive tasks belong in the language classroom and are not suitable in content courses. In fact, teachers often complain about having to reduce content in an EMI classroom, leaving little or no time for activities. However, it is commonly acknowledged that EMI teachers often need to deal with a passive class, where students are unresponsive and avoid interaction with the teacher. This chapter will first review literature on engineering education to demonstrate that an interactive approach in teaching not only makes learning more interesting but also allows teachers to gain insights into student learning. The chapter will then present and discuss the findings from four EMI courses offered by an undergraduate mechanical engineering (ME) program in a comprehensive university in southern Taiwan. Finally, the chapter will suggest quick but effective activities that meet teachers’ needs for quality feedback and students’ desire for oral practice.

Keywords

Content Knowledge Engineering Education Cooperative Learning Classroom Observation Engineering Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ABET. (2015). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf
  2. Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. doi: 10.1002/jee.20048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eilks, I. (2003). Co-operative curriculum development in a project of participatory action research within chemical education: Teachers’ reflections. Science Education International, 14(4), 41–49.Google Scholar
  4. Flowerdew, J., Miller, L., & Li, D. C. S. (2000). Chinese lecturers’ perceptions, problems, and strategies in lecturing in English to Chinese speaking students. RELC Journal, 31(1), 116–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lattuca, L. R., Bergom, I., & Knight, D. B. (2014). Professional development, departmental contexts, and use of instructional strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Macaro, E. (2015). Going Global 2015: English medium instruction: Seven key points of controversy [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/British_Council/going-global-2015-48709789
  7. Olds, B. M., Moskal, B. M., & Miller, R. L. (2005). Assessment in engineering education: Evolution, approaches and future collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Prince, M. J. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering, 93(3), 223–231.Google Scholar
  9. Seat, E., & Lord, S. M. (1999). Enabling effective engineering teams: A program for teaching interaction skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tsai, Y.-R., & Tsou, W. (2015). Accommodation strategies employed by non-native English-mediated instruction (EMI) teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Walczyk, J. J., & Ramsey, L. L. (2003). The use of learner-centered instruction in college science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 566–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and LiteratureNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations