Skip to main content

The Semantic Field: Sparring with Lewin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vygotsky’s Notebooks

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research ((PCHR,volume 2))

  • 917 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter contains documents connected with Vygotsky’s reception of Kurt Lewin’s field theory. It is well known that the work of Lewin, together with that of Wolfgang Köhler, Kurt Koffka, Karl Bühler, and Jean Piaget, formed a major source of inspiration for Vygotsky and that he borrowed many of their ideas. Much of the empirical work of Vygotsky’s group consisted of conceptual replications of the findings of these scholars. In designing these replication studies and in theoretical reflections about their results Vygotsky aimed to find the strong and weak points in the works of his colleagues. The work of Lewin became increasingly important in the early 1930s, also because of the close personal contacts between Vygotsky and Lewin and his (former) students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benjamin, L.T. (2006). A history of psychology in letters (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, T. (1931). Der Ärger als dynamisches Problem. Psychologische Forschung, 15, 1–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolov, Yu P. (1925). Fiziologicheskaya priroda instinkta. Leningrad: Vremya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, J. (2005). Of dogs and martyrs: Sherrington, Richards, Pavlov, and Vygotsky. Changing English, 12(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1983). The life of a psychologist. An autobiography. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1925). Die Grundlagen der psychischen Entwicklung: Eine Einführung in die Kinderpsychologie. Osterwieck am Harz: Verlag van A.W. Zickfeldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1921). Intelligenzprüfungen an Menschenaffen. Berlin: Julius Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1930). La perception humaine. Journal de Psychologie, 27, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladygina-Kohts, N.N. (1949). Predislovie. In N. Yu. Voytonis, Predystoriya intellekta. K probleme antropogeneza (pp. viii–x). Мoscow: АN SSSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1926). Vorsatz, Wille und Bedürfnis. Psychologische Forschung, 7, 330–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1931). Die psychologische Situation bei Lohn und Strafe. Stutgart: S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1933a). Environmental forces. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of child psychology (pp. 590–625). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1933b). Eine dynamische Theorie des Schwachsinnigen. In Hommage au Dr. Decroly (pp. 313–350). Brussels: S.n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York-London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samukhin, N.V., Birenbaum, G.V., & Vygotsky, L.S. (1934). K voprosu o dementsii pri bolezni Pika: klinicheskoe i eksperimental’no-psikhologicheskoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harсourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönpflug, W. (Ed.). (2007). Kurt Lewin—Person, Werk, Umfeld: historische Rekonstruktionen und aktuelle Wertungen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliosberg, S. (1934). Zur Dynamik des Ersatzes in Spiel- und Ernstsituationen. Psychologische Forschung, 19, 122–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todes, D. P. (2014). Ivan Pavlov: A Russian life in science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veer, R., & Yasnitsky, A. (2016). Translating Vygotsky: Some problems of transnational Vygotskian science. In A. Yasnitsky, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies (pp. 143–174). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1928). Psikhologicheskaya nauka. In V.P. Volgin, G.О. Gordon, I.K. Luppol (Eds.), Оbshchestvennye nauki v SSSR (1917—1927 gg.) (pp. 25–46). Мoscow: Rabotnik Prosveshcheniya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thought in schizophrenia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 31, 1062–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1935). Problema umstvennoy otstalosti (opyt postroeniya rabochey gipotezu). In L.S. Vygotsky & I.I. Danyushevskiy (Eds.), Umstvennootstalyy rebenok (pp. 7–34). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Uchebno-Pedagogicheskoe Izdatel’stvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1993). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 2. The fundamentals of defectology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1997a). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1997b). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4. The history of the development of the higher mental functions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1999). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 6. Scientific legacy. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (2001). Igra i ee rol’ v psikhicheskom razvitii rebenka. In Psikhologiya razvitiya (pp. 56–79). St. Petersburg: Piter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1930). Etjudy po istorii povedeniya: Obez’yana, primitiv, rebenok. Moscow-Leningrad: GIZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaroshevskiy, M. G. (1988). V shkole Kurta Levina (Iz besed s B.V. Zeigarnik). Voprosy Psikhologii, 3, 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasnitsky, A. & Van der Veer, R. (2016). Translating Vygotsky: Some problems of transnational Vygotskian science (pp. 143–174). In A. Yasnitsky, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavershneva, E Yu. (2015). Predstavleniya o smyslovom pole v teorii dinamicheskikh smyslovykh system L.S. Vygotskogo. Voprosy Psikhologii, 4, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Еkaterina Zavershneva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zavershneva, Е., van der Veer, R. (2018). The Semantic Field: Sparring with Lewin. In: Zavershneva, Е., van der Veer, R. (eds) Vygotsky’s Notebooks. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4625-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4625-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4623-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4625-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics