Advertisement

Deciphering Freshwater/Saline Water Interface in and Around Northern Chennai Region, Southern India

  • M. SenthilkumarEmail author
  • D. Gnanasundar
  • E. Sampath Kumar
Chapter
  • 424 Downloads
Part of the Springer Hydrogeology book series (SPRINGERHYDRO)

Abstract

Chennai, a city of almost seven million people, is one of the most water-stressed cities of India. While the population keeps skyrocketing, the volume of water available for them is dwindling. Scarcity intensifies conflict between Chennai and its peri-urban areas, which warrants urgent attention. The city receives about 985 million litres a day (mld) against the demand of 1200 mld. The present demand of 1200 mld includes the drinking water requirement for the city and its urban agglomerations that is 950 mld and the industrial demand of 250 mld. This demand is projected to increase to 2100 mld by 2031. Presently, the demand is met from the five freshwater reservoirs besides groundwater is pumped from 6 well fields in the inter-fluve area of the Araniyar and Korattalaiyar rivers. In the last decade, 3 well fields had to be abandoned due to seawater intrusion. In the dry months, seawater intrusion is observed 16 km inland, and after the monsoon, the seawater intrusion moves seaward side and is observed 14 km inland. There is an urgent need to monitor and regulate the fresh groundwater resource of the region. This paper describes the exact hydrological frame walk of the area. Rainwater harvesting and artificial recharge at apt locations in the Korattalaiyar River Plain so that the saline and fresh water interface is pushed further towards the seaward side.

Keywords

Seawater intrusion Minjur Coastal aquifer Chennai city Groundwater salinity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Er. K.B. Biswas, Chairman of Central Ground Water Board, Faridabad. Authors express their heartfelt thanks to Dr. Dipankar Saha, Member (SAM) for his utiring efforts in shaping the manuscript and for his evaluable suggestion. Authors also thank Member (WQ & TT) and to Sh. D.S.C. Thambi, Retd. Member, CGWB, Faridabad, for their support and guidance. Thanks are also expressed to Head of Office, SECR, CGWB, and all the officers and officials of CGWB, SECR, Chennai, for their support during the study.

References

  1. APHA (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (Franson, Mary Ann H, editor), 18th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. CGWB (1981) Puduvoyal basic data report of Puduvoyal well site, p 20Google Scholar
  3. Davis SN, Whittemore DO, Fabryka-Martin J (1996) Uses of chloride/bromide ratios in studies of potable water. Ground Water 36(2):338–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gnanasundar D, Elango L (1999) Ground water quality assessment of a coastal aquifer using geoelectrical techniques. Int J Envi Hydrol 6:21–33Google Scholar
  5. Kim Y, Lee K-S, Koh D-C, Lee D-H, Lee S-G, Park W-B, Koh G-W, Woo NC (2003) Hydrogeochemical and isotopic evidence of groundwater salinization in a coastal aquifer: a case study in Jeju volcanic island, Korea. J Hydrol 270:282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mukherjee A, Saha D, Harvey CF, Taylor RG, Ahmed KM (2015) Groundwater systems of the Indian Sub-Continent (Soumendra N. Bhanja). J Hydrol Reg Stud. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.03.005
  7. Saha D (2009) Arsenic groundwater contamination in parts of middle Ganga Plain, Bihar. Curr Sci 97(6)Google Scholar
  8. Sathish S, Elango L, Rajesh R, Sarma VS (2011) Assessment of seawater mixing in a coastal aquifer by high resolution electrical resistivity tomography. Int J Env Sci Tech 8(3):483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schoonen MAA, Devoe V, Brown CJ (1995) Bromide in Long Island ground waters and surface waters. Geology of Long Island and Metropolitan New York, April 22 1995, Program with Abstracts. Stony Brook, New York, Long Island Geologists, pp 118–126Google Scholar
  10. Vengosh A, Pankratov I (1998) Chloride/bromide and chloride/fluoride ratios of domestic sewage effluents and associated contaminated ground water. Ground Water 36(5):815–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Senthilkumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Gnanasundar
    • 1
  • E. Sampath Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Ground Water Board, SECR, MoWR, RD & GRChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Central Ground Water BoardFaridabadIndia

Personalised recommendations