Abstract
This chapter outlines a general picture of the phenomenon of subjectivity in Soviet psychology. In order to do this, the author organised a non-conventional group of authors, who came from different traditions of Soviet psychology and made important contributions for development of the topic of subjectivity from a cultural-historical standpoint. These traditions that historically were presented as excluded to one another, by the classical soviet’s official historiography, are discussed in their point of contact and in their complementation as the basis for developing a new representation of subjectivity. It also presents the turn toward the study of the consciousness and symbolical realities of authors who appeared as being followers of the Activity Theory in early moments of their work (Davydov 2002; Zinchenko 2009). After drawing such a picture about the phenomenon of Soviet psychology related to the antecedents of subjectivity , the author develops on his theoretical proposal about subjectivity. He develops a representation of subjectivity as a system that permits to understand how the historical experiences and the simultaneous contexts of the individual current’s life experiences appear together in a new units of subjectivity, defined by the author in the intertwined movements between subjective configurations and subjective senses . Finally it discussed the relevance of dialogue for this proposal about subjectivity . On this matter, the author establishes the differences between this proposal and those that characterise the dialogical psychology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The plural form of perezhivanie in the Russian language was taken from Bozhovich’s original text in Russian. The entire quotation was compared with the original Russian work.
References
Abuljanova, K. A. (1973). O subjekte pyskjicheskoi deyatelnosti [On the subject of psychical activity]. Moscow: Nauka.
Abuljanova, K. A. (1980). Deyatelnosti i psykjologiya lishnosti [Activity and theory of personality]. Moscow: Nauka.
Abuljanova, K. A., & Brushlinsky, A. V. (1989). Filosofko – psykjologicheskaya konseptsiya S. L. Rubinshteina [Philosophical—Psychological conceptions of S. L. Rubinstein]. Moscow: Nauka.
Ananiev, B. G. (1977). O problemax sobremennovo chelabekaznaniya [About the problems of the contemporary knowledge on the person]. Moscow: Nauka.
Bozhovich, L. I. (2009a). Lishnost i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [The personality and its formation in the childhood]. Moscow: Piter.
Bozhovich, L. I. (2009b). The social situation of child development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(4), 59–86.
Bruschlinsky, A. V. (1994). Problemy psykjologii subekta [The problems of the psychology of the subject]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.
Bruschlinsky, A. V. (2001). Camaya shitaemaya oteshestbennaya kniga no psikjologii: Triumphy, tragedii, paradoksy [The most read book in the national psychological literature: triumphs, tragedies and paradoxes]. Psykjologishesky Journal, 22, 5–13.
Bruschlinsky, A. V. (2002). Psykjologiya subjekta i teoriya razvivayochego obrazobaniya [Psychology of the subject and theory of developmental education]. In Razvivayushee Obrazovanie. Dialog c D. V. Davydovym [Developmental Education. Dialog with V. V. Davydov] (pp. 128–135). Moscow: AKP & PRO.
Castoriadis, C. (1995). Logic, imagination, reflection. In A. Elliott & S. Frosh (Eds.), Psychoanalysis in context (pp. 15–35). London: Routledge.
Chen, F., & Fleer, M. (2015). Re-signing: A cultural historical study of signs for supporting young children’s development of emotion regulation. Mind, Culture & Activity, 22(3), 233–250. doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1048370.
Chudnovsky, V. E. (1976). O vozrastnom padjodii k problem formikrobaniya lischnosti u scholnikov [About aging approach to the problem of the formation of personality in students]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology], 4, 41–54.
Chudnovsky, V. E. (1988). Problema subjektivnosti v svete sobremennyx zadach psykjologii vozpitaniya [The problem of subjectivity in the light of the current task of the psychology of education]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology], 4, 5–24.
Davydov, V. V. (1992). Genezis i razvitie lischnosti v detskom vozraste [The genesis and development of personality in the child age]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology], 1(2), 22–33.
Davydov, V. V. (1999). Structure and content. In A. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 39–49). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Davydov, V. V. (2002). Novii padjod i ponimaniyu struktury i soderchaniya deyatelnosti [New approach to comprehension of structure and content of activity]. In Razvivayochee obrazobanie. Dialog with V. V. Davydov. [Developmental education. Dialog with V. V. Davydov] (pp. 24–34). Moscow: AKP & PRO.
Elkonin, D. B. (1971). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of the child. Voprocy Psykhologii [Questions of Psychology], 4, 6–20.
Fakhrutdinova, L. R. (2010). On the phenomenon of “Perezhivanie”. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48, 31–37.
Fleer, M., & Quinones, G. (2013). An assessment perezhivanie: Building and assessment pedagogy for, with and of early childhood science learning. In D. Currigim, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 231–247). Dordrecht: Springer.
Frosh, S. (2002). After words. London: Palfrave.
Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis outside the clinic. London: Palgrave macmillan.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (1983). Obshenie i evo znashenie v razrabotke problemy lishnosti [The communication and its relevance in the elaboration of the problem of personality]. Psykjologuishesky Zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 4(4), 40–47.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (1995). Personalidad, comunicación y desarrollo [Personality, comunicación and development]. Havana: Pueblo y Educación.
González Rey, F. (2000). La categoría sentido y su significación en la construcción del pensamiento psicológico. Contrapontos, 1(2), 13–28.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2002). Sujeto y subjetividad: Una aproximación histórico-cultural [Subject and subjectivity: A cultural-historical approach]. Mexico, DF: Thomson.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2007). Psicoterapia, subjetividade y Posmodernidade: Uma aproximacao histórico-cultural [Psychotherapy, subjectivity and Posmodernity: An historical-cultural approach]. Cengage. Sao Paulo.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2009). Historical relevance of Vygotsky´s work: Its significance for a new approach to the problem of subjectivity in psychology. Outlines: Critical Practice Studies, 11, 59–73.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2011). A re-examination of defining moments in Vygotsky’s work and their implications for his continuing legacy. Mind, Culture & Activity, 18, 257–275.
González Rey, F (2012). Subjetividade e saude: superando la clínica da patologia. [Subjectivity and health: overcoming the clinic centered on the pathology]. VOZES. Sao Paulo.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2014). Human motivation in question: Discussing emotions, motives and subjectivity from a cultural-historical standpoint. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 45(3), 1–18. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12073.
González Rey, F. (2015). A new path for the discussion of Social Representations: Advancing the topic of subjectivity from a cultural-historical standpoint. Theory & Psychology (pp. 1–19). doi:10.1177/0959354315587783.
Goulart, D. M. (2013). Institucionalização, subjetividade e desenvolvimento humano: abrindo novos caminhos entre educação e saúde mental [Institutionalization, subjectivity and human development: opening new paths between education and mental health]. Masters Dissertation. Brasília: University of Brasília.
Hedegaard, M. (2012). The dynamic aspects in children’s learning and development. In: M. Hedegaard, A. Edwards & M. Fleers (Eds.), Motives in children development: cultural historical Approaches
Jodelet, D. (1989). Madness and social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Leontiev, A. A. (1984). The productive career of A. N. Leontiev. Soviet Psychology, 13, 5–56.
Leontiev, A. A. (1992). Ecce homo: Methodological problems of the activity theoretical approach. Multidisciplinary Newsletter for Activity Theory, 11(12), 41–45.
Leontiev, A. A. (2001). Deyatelnii Um (Deyatelnosti, znak, lichnosti) [The active mind (Activity, sign, personality)]. Moscow, Russia: Smysl.
Lomov, B. F. (1978). Kategorii obtscheniya i deyatelnosti v psykjologii [The categories of communication and activity in psychology]. Vorpocy Filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 8, 34–47.
Lomov, B. F. (1984). Metodologuisheskie i teoreticheskie problemy pskykjologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow: Nauka.
Matusov, E. (2011). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 99–119.
Miasichev, V. N. (1960). Lischnost i nevrozy [Personality and neurosis]. Leningrad: Leningrad State University.
Moreno, J. L. (1994). Psychodrama & group psychotherapy. Virginia: American Society for Group Psychotherapy & Psychodrama.
Moscovici, S., & Markova, I. (1998). Presenting social representations: A conversation. Culture & Psychology, 4(3), 371–410.
Rodriguez Arocho, W. (2010). Los conceptos de vivencia y situación social del desarrollo: Reflexión en torno a su lugar en el modelo teórico de Lev. S. Vygotski [The concepts of perezhivanie and social situation of development and their place in the theoretical model of Lev. S. Vygotsky]. In S. Aburto, Meza Peña (Eds.), Tutorials for human development: Different approaches (pp. 73–92). Monterrey: Editora Universidad de Nuevo León.
Santos Bezerra, M. (2014). Dificuldades de aprendizagem e subjetividade: Para além das representações hegemônicas do aprender [Learning difficulties and subjectivity: Beyond the dominant representations of learning]. Masters Dissertation. Brasília: University of Brasília.
Smagorinsky, P. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: The psychology of art and the actor under the direction of perezhivanie. Mind Culture & Activity, 18(4), 319–341.
Smirnov, C. (1993). Obshepsikjologuisheskaya teoria deyatelnosti: Perspektivy i ogranisheniya: K 90 letiu so dinya roshdeniya A. N. Leontieva [The general theory of activity: Perspectives and constrains: On the 90th anniversary of the birth of A.N. Leontiev]. Vorpocy Psykjologii, 4, 94–101.
Smirnova, E. O. (1996). Problema obsheniya rebenka i vsroslogo v rabotax L.S. Vygotskovo I M.I. Lisinoi [The problem of the communication of the child and adult in the works of L.S. Vygotsky and M.I. Lisina]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology], 6, 76–87.
Shotter, J. (2012). Agentive spaces, the “Background” and the other not well articulated influences in shaping our lives. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 43(2), 133–154.
Valsiner, J. (2001). From energy to collectivity: A commentary on the development of Bekhterev´s theoretical views. In L. L. Strickland (Ed.), V. M. Bekhterev collected reflexology (pp. 1–28). New Jersey: Transaction Publisher.
Voloshinov, V. (2009). El Marxismo y la filosofía del lenguaje [The Marxism and the philosophy of the language]. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Godot.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1965). Psykhologiya Iskustva [Psychology of art]. Moscow, Russia: Izdatelstva Iskustva.
Yarochevsky, M. G. (2007). L. S. Vygotsky: V poiskax novoi psykjologii [L. S. Vygotsky: In the search for a new psychology]. Moscow, Russia: L. K. I.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1993). Kulturno-istorisheskaya psykjologia: Opit amplifikatsii [Cultural-historical psychology: The experience of amplification]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology], 4, 5–19.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1995). Cultural-historical psychology and the psychological theory of activity: Retrospect and prospect. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 37–55). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2002a). From classical to organic psychology. In D. Robbins & A. Stetsenko (Eds.), Commemoration of the centennial of Lev Vygotsky’s birth: Voices within Vygotsky’s non-classical psychology. New York: Nova Science Publisher.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2002b). Problematika mishleniya v razvivayushevo obysheniya [The problem of thinking in developmental teaching]. In Razvivayushee obrazovanie. Dialog c V.V. Davydovym [Developmental education. Dialog with V.V. Davydov] (pp. 46–102). Moscow: Akademiya.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2009). Consciousness as the subject matter and task of psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(5), 44–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González Rey, F. (2017). Advances in Subjectivity from a Cultural-Historical Perspective: Unfoldings and Consequences for Cultural Studies Today. In: Fleer, M., González Rey, F., Veresov, N. (eds) Perezhivanie, Emotions and Subjectivity. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4534-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4534-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4532-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4534-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)