Skip to main content

Mycology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Fungal infections/mycoses are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with an impaired immune system. The clinical diagnosis relies mainly on conventional methods like direct microscopy, culture, radiographic imaging and the evaluation of clinical symptoms. Identification of the fungal pathogen is possible when a positive culture is available, but the diagnostic sensitivity of fungal culture is very low. Molecular assays have been developed to aid in the identification of the fungi when cultures remain negative. These assays can be used to identify the fungi when fungal elements are seen in clinical material. Recently, the more sensitive genus- and species-specific qPCR assays are increasingly being used to aid in the rapid diagnosis of fungal infections. Many PCR assays for the direct detection and identification of dermatophytes in clinical material have been developed during the last decade. The introduction of real-time PCR assays in routine clinical laboratories has speeded up dermatophytosis diagnostics tremendously from turnaround times of two to four weeks (culture), to less than one day. It has also resulted in a huge reduction in hands-on time. Another major advantage of (real-time) PCR is the superior sensitivity as compared to dermatophyte culture. The development of molecular diagnostics has greatly improved the possibilities for faster, more guided treatment of dermatologic disorders, resulting in a significant decrease of adverse effects of antifungals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading Invasive Fungal Infections

  • Alanio A, et al. ECIL guidelines for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(9):2386–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avni T, Leibovici L, Paul M. PCR diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(2):665–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw B, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday CL, et al. Molecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal disease: the horizon draws nearer? Pathology. 2015;47(3):257–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kourkoumpetis TK, et al. Polymerase chain reaction-based assays for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(9):1322–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MW, Walsh TJ. PCR methodology and applications for the detection of human fungal pathogens. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(9):1025–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulska M, Furfaro E, Viscoli C. Non-cultural methods for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(1):103–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White PL, et al. Aspergillus PCR: one step closer to standardization. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1231–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • White PL, et al. Aspergillus polymerase chain reaction: systematic review of evidence for clinical use in comparison with antigen testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(8):1293–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading Dermatophyte Infections

  • Bergmans AMC, et al. Validation of PCR-reverse line blot, a method for rapid detection and identification of nine dermatophyte species in nail, skin and hair samples. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:778–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmans AMC, et al. Evaluation of a single-tube real-time PCR for detection and identification of 11 dermatophyte species in clinical material. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:704–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cafarchia C. et al. Molecular epidemiology, phylogeny and evolution of dermatophytes. Infect Genet Evol. 2013; 20:336–51 (Review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayette M.P. et al. Dermatophytosis, trends in epidemiology and diagnostic approach. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2015; 9:164–79 (Review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen R.H. et al. Molecular diagnosis of dermatophyte infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012; 25:126–34 (Review).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jochem B. Buil or A.M.C. Bergmans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buil, J.B., Zoll, J., Verweij, P.E., Melchers, W.J., Bergmans, A. (2017). Mycology. In: van Pelt-Verkuil, E., van Leeuwen, W., te Witt, R. (eds) Molecular Diagnostics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4511-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics