Skip to main content

Comparison of Heart Rate Variability and Pulse Rate Variability of Respiratory Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (ICBHI 2015)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 64))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) can be applied to observe the autonomic nervous system activity of human beings. With the development of wearable device technology, PPG signal is often applied to measure pulse rate, and furthermore to analyze the pulse rate variability (PRV), which is considered to be equivalent to HRV. However, regular heart rate will be affected by breath volume and breath rate that causes different results when HRV and PRV are measured in different situations. This paper presents a study based on the characteristics of the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), the heart rate and tide volume of breath and the variabilities from PPG and ECG which were measured by PSG simultaneously. Furthermore, according to the measurement of PTT based on PPG and ECG signals, the characteristics of peripheral arteries were evaluated. From the results, it was found that the significance (p < 0.05) is shown between HRV and PRV when normal young groups are controlled at different tide volume of breath. No significance is shown on the PRV obtained from four limbs. In summary, the PRV and HRV show different characteristics at different breath controls. There are no differences between each PRV when PPG signals are obtained from four limbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Allen, “Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement,” Physiol. Meas. 28, R1–R39. 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, “Heart rate variability—Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use,” European Heart Journal, vol. 17, pp. 354–381. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. L. A. Carvalho, “A Tool for Time-Frequency Analysis of Heart Rate Variability,” (in Portuguese), M.Sc. dissertation, Publication ENE.DM-156N03, Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Hayano, A. K. Barros, A. Kamiya, N. Ohte, and F. Yasuma, “Assessment of pulse rate variability by the method of pulse–frequency demodulation,” Biomed. Eng. Online, vol. 4, p. 62, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. S. McKinley, P. A. Shapiro, E. Bagiella, M. M. Myers, R. E. De Meersman, I. Grant, and R. P. Sloan, “Deriving heart period variability from blood pressure waveforms,” J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1431–1438, Oct. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Chang, C. Chang, C. Chiu, S. Hsu, Y. Lin. “Variations of HRV analysis in different approaches,” Comput Cardiol, vol. 34, pp. 17–20. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asada, H. Harry, et al. “Mobile monitoring with wearable photoplethysmographic biosensors,” Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 22.3, pp. 28–40. 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Schäfer, J. Vagedes, “How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability? A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 166, pp. 15–29. 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Constant, D. Laude, I. Murat, J.L. Elghozi, “Pulse rate variability is not a surrogate for heart rate variability,” Clin Sci., London, vol. 97, pp. 391–397. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. K. Triedman, J. P. Saul, “Blood Pressure Modulation by Central Venous Pressure and Respiration Buffering Effects of the Heart Rate Reflexes,” Circulation, vol. 89, pp. 169–179. 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Sadhukhan, M. Mitra, “R-peak detection algorithm for ECG using double difference and RR interval processing,” Procedia Technology, vol. 4, pp. 873–877. February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 103-2632-E-033-001) and (102-2628-B-182A-001-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang-Ping Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Han, Y., Lin, WC., Huang, SC., Tsai, CL., Lin, KP. (2019). Comparison of Heart Rate Variability and Pulse Rate Variability of Respiratory Control. In: Zhang, YT., Carvalho, P., Magjarevic, R. (eds) International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. ICBHI 2015. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 64. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4505-9_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4505-9_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4504-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4505-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics