Skip to main content

A Hybrid Non-invasive Method for the Classification of Amputee’s Hand and Wrist Movements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (ICBHI 2015)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 64))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 721 Accesses

Abstract

The quest to develop dexterous artificial arm which supports multiple degrees of freedom for amputees has attracted a lot of study interest in the last few decades. The outcome of some of the studies had identified surface Electromyography (EMG) as the most commonly used biological signal in predicting the motion intention of an amputee. Different EMG based control methods for multifunctional prosthesis have been proposed and investigated in a number of previous studies. However, no any multifunctional prostheses are clinically available yet. One of the possible reasons would be that the residual muscles after amputations might not produce sufficient EMG signals for movement classifications. In this study, we proposed to use electroencephalography (EEG) signals recorded from the scalp of an amputee as additional signals for motion identifications. The performance of a hybrid scheme based on the combination of EMG and EEG signals in identifying different hand and wrist movements was evaluated in one transhumeral amputee. Our pilot results showed that the proposed hybrid method increased the classification accuracy in identifying different hand and wrist movements of the amputee. This suggests that the proposed method may have potential to improve the control of multifunctional prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T.A. Kuiken, G. Li, B.A. Lock, et al, “Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 301, no. 6, pp. 619–628, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Li, and T.A. Kuiken, “EMG Pattern Recognition Control of Multifunctional Protheses by Transradial Amputees,” 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 6914–6917, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Sahin and F. Sahin, “Pattern Recognition with surface EMG Signal based on Wavelet Transformation,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Oct. 14–17, 2012, COEX, Seoul, Korea, pp. 295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Asghari, O.H. Hu, “Myoelectric control systems: A survey”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, pp. 275–294, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Li, A.E. Schultz, and T.A. Kuiken, “Quantifying Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y.U. Huang, K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins, “A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1801–1811, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.L. Thilina, T. Kenbu, H. Yoshiaki, and K. Kazuo, “Towards Hybrid EEG-EMG-based control approaches to be used in bio-robotics applications: current status, challenges, and future directions,” Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics, vol. 4(2), pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D.J. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, and T.M. Vaughan, “Brain Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control,” Clinical Neurophysiology 113 (2002), pp. 767–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.J. McFarland, L.M. McCane, and J.R. Wolpaw, “EEG-based communication: short-term role of feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 7–11, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Birbaumer, “Breaking the silence: Brain—computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control,” Psychophysiology, 43 (2006), pp. 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.W. Jonathan, B. Niels, J.M. Dennis, P. Gert, M.V. Theresa, “Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control,” Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(2002), 767–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Kiguchi and Y. Hayashi, “Motion Estimation based on EMG and EEG Signals to Control Wearable Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 4214–4218, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Shibasaki and J.C. Rothwell, “EMG-EEG Correlation,” Recommendations for the Practice of Clinical Neurophysiology: Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Physiology (EEG Suppl. 52), pp. 269–274, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Ferreira1, W.C. Celeste1, F.A. Cheein, T.F. Bastos-Filho, M. Sarcinelli-Filho, and R. Carelli, “Human-machine interfaces based on EMG and EEG applied to robotic systems,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2008, 5:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V.V. Ramalingam, S. Mohan, V. Sugumaran, “A Comparison of EMG and EEG signals for prostheses control using decision tree,” International Journal of Research in Computer Applications & Information Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–08, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Li, Y. Li, L. Yu, and Y. Geng, “Conditioning and sampling issues of EMG signals in motion recognition of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1779–1787, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L.J. Hargrove, G. Li, K.B. Englehart, and B.S. Hudgins, “Principal Components Analysis Preprocessing for Improved Classification Accuracies in Pattern-Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control,” IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1407–1414, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank members of the Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, for their assistance in the data acquisition. Lastly, I (O. W. Samuel) sincerely appreciate the support of CAS-TWAS President’s Fellowship to pursue a Ph.D. degree at the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. The Research work was supported in part by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (#2013CB329505), the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants (#61135004, #61203209), and Shenzhen Governmental Basic Research Grant (#JCYJ20130402113127532).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanglin Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Samuel, O.W., Li, X., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Li, G. (2019). A Hybrid Non-invasive Method for the Classification of Amputee’s Hand and Wrist Movements. In: Zhang, YT., Carvalho, P., Magjarevic, R. (eds) International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. ICBHI 2015. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 64. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4505-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4505-9_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4504-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4505-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics