Skip to main content

State Auditing and Anticorruption Campaign: Evidence from China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the role of state auditing in the anticorruption campaign throughout the Chinese Central Government Succession substantiated in 2012. A data set of 269 state audit reports disclosed by China’s National Audit Office (CNAO) has been manually collected from the CNAO’s open access and coded into the research sample. This study reveals that the anticorruption campaign launched by the new Central Government of China is concentrating on the political path for the country’s healthy and steady socioeconomic development instead of the political purge stereotypes imposed upon it. This study shows that CNAO, which performs the state audit , follows the political directions of the renewed anticorruption campaign. These conclusions contribute to the existing audit and corruption research literature by clarifying the true motivation of the anticorruption campaign in China and the strategic role played by CNAO in governmental governance and the national anticorruption campaign during the Central Government succession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agatiello OR (2010) Corruption not an end. Manage Decis 48(10):1456–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AV, Mullainathan S, Hanna R (2012) Corruption. MIT department of economics working paper No. 12-08. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2022236. Accessed 30 Jul 2016

  • Barme G (2014) Tyger! Tyger! A fearful symmetry, The China story (online). Available at: https://www.thechinastory.org/2014/10/tyger-tyger-a-fearful-symmetry/1. 30 Jul 2016

  • Blume L, Voigt S (2011) Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment. Eur J Polit Econ 27:15–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K (2004) Fiscal centralization and the form of corruption in China. Eur J Polit Econ 20:1001–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJP, Li Z, Su X, Sun Z (2011) Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. J Corp Finance 17:229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung ABL (2015) Combating corruption as a political strategy to rebuild trust and legitimacy: can China learn from Hong Kong? Comparative Governance reform in Asia: democracy, corruption, and Government trust: research in public policy analysis and management, vol 17. pp 55–84

    Google Scholar 

  • China’s National Audit Office (CNAO) (2015) CNAO’s State audit reports. Available at: http://www.audit.gov.cn/n5/n25/index.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2015

  • Dong B, Torgler B (2012) Corruption and social interaction: evidence from China. J Policy Model 34:932–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Torgler B (2013) Causes of corruption: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 26:152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzhumashev R (2014) Corruption and growth: the role of governance, public spending, and economic development. Econ Model 37:202–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong T (1997) Forms and characteristics of China’s corruption in the 1990s: change with continuity. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(3):277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul FA, Lu H (2011) Corruption in contemporary China—an old dilemma with new features. Truths and half truths: China’s socio-economic reforms from 1978–2010. A volume in Chandos Asian studies series, pp 131–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Li S (2015) Anti-corruption measures in China: suggestions for reforms. Asian Educ Dev Stud 4(1):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J (2016) Reorganization of anti-corruption agencies in China. J Money Laundering Control 19(2) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayrak M (2008) Evolving challenges for supreme audit institutions in struggling with corruption. J Financ Crime 15(1):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G, Thorne K (2015) Corruption, criminality and the privatized state: the implications for accounting. Account Forum 39:366–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Liu S (2017) Corruption crime and punishment: evidence from China’s state corruption audits. J Financ Crime (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2012) On national governance and national auditing. Soc Sci China (in Chinese) (6):60–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2015) National audit in the modernization of national governance: institutional guarantees and practice logic. Soc Sci China (in Chinese) (9):64–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Lin B (2012) Government auditing and corruption control: evidence from China’s provincial panel data. China J Account Res 5:163–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X (2000) Cadres and corruption: the organizational involution of the Chinese communist party. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu D, Everett J, Rahaman AS, Martinez D (2013) Accounting and networks of corruption. Account Organ Soc 38:505–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olken BA (2007) Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J Polit Econ 115(2):200–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah JST (2013) Curbing corruption in Singapore: the importance of political will, expertise, enforcement, and context, in different paths to curbing corruption. Res Public Policy Anal Manage 23:137–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah JST (2015) Evaluating the effectiveness of anti-corruption agencies in five Asian countries. Asian Educ Dev Stud 4(1):143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah JST (2016) Combating corruption in six Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Asian Educ Dev Stud 5(2):244–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez CD (2014) Is corruption in China “out of control”? a comparison with the US in historical perspective. J Comp Econ 42(1):76–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 (online). Available at: www.transparency.org/cpi2015. Accessed 1 May 2016

  • Wedeman A (2005) Anticorruption campaigns and the intensification of corruption in China. J Contemp China 14(42):93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Xiao JZ, Pendlebury M (2008) Government auditing in China: problems and reform. Adv Account Incorporating Adv Inter Account 24:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao S (2002) Privilege and corruption: the problems of China’s socialist market economy. Am J Econ Sociol 61:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L (2015) Punishing corrupt officials in China. China Q 223:595–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangyou Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, G., Gong, K. (2018). State Auditing and Anticorruption Campaign: Evidence from China. In: Gal, G., Akisik, O., Wooldridge, W. (eds) Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4502-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics