Advertisement

The General Agreement on Trade in Services

  • Catherine A. BrownEmail author
Chapter
  • 314 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the non-discrimination obligations in the multilateral General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), including national treatment and most favoured nation treatment and examines how the GATS non-discrimination obligations interrelate with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and UN Model Tax Treaties. The purpose of the discussion in this chapter is twofold. The first is to make plain the differences in non-discrimination principles that emerge in tax and trade agreements as they apply to non-resident services and service providers. The second is to illustrate the permitted differences in the tax treatment of non-resident service providers under the GATS due to the carve out of tax measures from trade obligations.

Keywords

Host Country National Treatment Double Taxation Permanent Establishment Favoured Nation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

Treaties and Treaty Documents

  1. Convention between Canada and the United States of America with respect to taxes on income and on capital, 26 September, 1980 Can TS 1984 No 15.Google Scholar
  2. Convention between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United Mexican States for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income, 12 September, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Manual for the negotiation of bilateral tax treaties. UN Committee of experts on international cooperation in tax matters, 7th Sess, UN Doc E/C.18/2011/CRP.2/Add.1. Geneva: 24–28 October, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. OECD, Centre for tax policy and administration. 2008 Update to the OECD tax convention. 18 July, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. OECD, Model tax convention on income and on capital 2014 (full version). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. OECD, Working Party no 1 on tax conventions and related questions: Taxation and non-discrimination. Doc No CTPA/CFA/WP1/WD (2005) 7 (2005).Google Scholar
  7. United Nations, Model double taxation convention between developed and developing countries (2011). Google Scholar
  8. WTO, Canada final list of article II (MFN) exemptions (1994a). WTO Doc GATS/EU16. Online: WTO http://docsonline.wto.org
  9. WTO, Canada schedule of specific commitments (1994b). WTO Doc GATS/SC/16. Online: WTO http://docsonline.wto.org
  10. WTO, General agreement on trade in services (1995).Google Scholar
  11. WTO, Members and observers (14 July, 2016). Online: WTO https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm
  12. WTO, Schedules of commitments and lists of article II exemptions. Online: WTO http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/serv_commitments_e.htm
  13. WTO, The United States of America schedule of specific commitments (15 April, 1994). WTO Doc GATS/SC/90. Online: WTO http://docsonline.wto.org
  14. WTO, United States of America final list of article II (MFN) exemptions (15 April, 1994). WTO Doc GATS/EU90. Online: WTO http://docsonline.wto.org
  15. WTO, Uruguay round—Group of negotiations on services—The applicability of the GATS to tax measures—Note by the secretariat (1 December, 1993). WTO Doc MTN.GNS/W/210.Google Scholar

Jurisprudence

  1. WTO, Canada—Certain measures affecting the auto industry (complaint by Japan). (2000). WTO Doc WT/DSI39/AB/R.Google Scholar
  2. WTO, European Communities—Regime for the importation, sale and distribution of bananas (complaint by Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and The United States). (1997a). WTO Doc WT/DS27/AB/R.Google Scholar
  3. WTO, The European Communities—Regime for the importation, sale, and dibtribution of bananas (complaint by Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and the United States) (1997b), WTO Doc WT/DS27/R/USA.Google Scholar

Secondary Material

  1. Broadman, H. G. (1993). International trade and investment in services: A comparative analysis of the NAFTA. International Lawyer, 27(3), 623.Google Scholar
  2. Cossy, M. (2006). Determining ‘likeness’ under the GATS: Squaring the circle. Staff working paper, ERSD-2006-08, World Trade Organization—Economic Research and Statistics Division.Google Scholar
  3. Farrell, J. E. (2013). The interface of international trade law and taxation. Amsterdam, NL: IBFD.Google Scholar
  4. OECD. Issues related to article 14 of the OECD model tax convention. Issues in International Taxation, No 7 (2000).Google Scholar
  5. Lang, J., & Stack, R. (2000). What tax lawyers should know about trade law. Tax Management International Journal, 29(10), 566Google Scholar
  6. Stahl, T. H. E. (1994). Liberalizing international trade in services: The case for sidestepping the GATT. Yale Journal of International Law, 19(2), 405.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations