Slate-Enabled Literacy Practices in a Futureschool@Singapore Classroom



The chapter examines and analyzes literacy practices in a FutureSchool@Singapore English Language classroom where each student has a tablet personal computer, which the school termed the ‘slate’. The study adopted an ecological approach to understanding literacy and employed digitally enhanced classroom microethnographic methods in its data collection. Using Activity Theory to guide the analysis of slate-enabled literacy events in this classroom, the research found that such a 1:1 computing networked environment allowed student participants to be active agents in shaping classroom literacy practices. The study provides evidences of teachers and students negotiating knowledge transmission and knowledge building pedagogies, and how such a learning environment can potentially bridge the “digital divide” between in-school and out-of-school literacy practices.


  1. Alderson, J.Charles, and Dianne Wall. 1993. Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics 14: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backer, Elisa. 2010. Using smartphones and Facebook in a major assessment: The student experience. EJournal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching 4:19–31. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  3. Baguley, Margaret, Darren L. Pullen, and Megan Short. 2010. Multiliteracies and the new world order. In Multiliteracies and technology enhanced education: Social practice and the global classroom, ed. Darren L. Pullen, and David R. Cole, 1–17. NY: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, Dennis. 2009. A better pencil: Reader, writer, and the digital revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. boyd, danah. 2008. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Youth, identity and digital media, ed. David Buckingham, 119–142. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. boyd, danah. 2014. It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  7. Burnett, Cathy, Julia Davis, Guy Merchant, and Jennifer Rowsell. 2014. New literacies around the globe: Policy and pedagogy. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Carspecken, Phil. 1996. Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, Manuel. 2009. The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castells, Manuel. 2010. End of millennium. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Channel News Asia. 2016. Singapore needs to stay ahead while pursuing smart nation vision. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  12. Chinnery, George M. 2006. Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology 10:9–16. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  13. Cochrane, Thomas, and Bateman, Roger. 2010. Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26:1–14. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  14. Engeström, Yrjö, and Reijo Miettinen. 1999. Perspectives on activity theory. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engeström, Yrjö. 2001. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14: 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32: 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fullan, Michael, and Langworthy, Maria. 2014. The rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  18. Green, Judith, and Bloome, David. 1997. Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective. In Handbook of research on teaching literacy through communicative and visual arts, ed. James Flood, Shirley Brice Health, and Diane Lapp, 181–202. NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Hogan, David. 2010. Current and future pedagogies in Singapore—Presentation at TE21 Summit. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  20. Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore. (n.d.). iN2015 vision. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  21. Ito, Mizuko, Baumer, Sonja, Bittanti, Matteo, boyd, danah, Cody, Rachel, Herr Stephenson, Becky, Horst, Heather A., Lange, Patricia G., Mahendran, Dilan, Martinez, Katynka Z, Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, Dan, Robinson, Laura, Sims, Christo, and Tripp, Lisa. 2010. Hanging out, messing around, geeking out. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kolb, Liz. 2008. Toys to tools: Connecting student cell phones to education. Eugene, OR: ISTE.Google Scholar
  24. Low, Aloysius. 2014. Singapore has the highest smartphone adoption rate in the world. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  25. Merchant, Guy. 2009. Virtual worlds in real-life classrooms. In Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices, ed. Victoria Carrington, and Muriel Robinson, 95–112. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merchant, Guy. 2012. Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital technologies and schooling revisited. British Journal of Educational Technology 43: 770–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mills, Kathy A. 2007. “Have you seen Lord of the Rings?” Power, pedagogy and discourses in a multiliteracies classroom. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 6: 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mills, Kathy A. 2010. “Filming in progress”: New spaces for multimodal designing. Linguistics and Education 21: 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mills, Kathy. 2016. Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  30. Ministry of Education, Singapore. 2012. Media Release: Factsheet on Futureschool@Singapore programme. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  31. Ministry of Education, Singapore. 2015a. 21st century competencies. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  32. Ministry of Education, Singapore. 2015b. 4th masterplan for ICT in education. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  33. Ng, Siew Hiang Sally. 2015. Decoding ICT-mediated literacy practices in a networked one-to-one computing classroom in Singapore. UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  34. Pachler, Norbert, Ben Bachmair, and John Cook. 2010. Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parry, David. 2011. Mobile perspectives: On teaching mobile literacy. EDUCAUSE Review 46. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  36. Pegrum, Mark. 2014. Mobile learning: Languages, literacies and cultures. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. The University of Phoneix Research Institute. 2011. Future Work Skills 2020. Accessed 13 June 2016.
  38. Warschauer, Mark. 2006. Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  39. Warschauer, Mark. 2011. Learning in the cloud. NY: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  40. White, David S., and Le Cornu, Alison. 2011. Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. Accessed 13 June 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Singapore Ministry of EducationSingaporeMalaysia

Personalised recommendations