Advertisement

Russian Dolls and Three Forms of Capital: Ecological and Sociological Perspectives on Parents’ Engagement with Young Children’s Tablet Use

Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, young children’s (aged 0–5) use of tablets within family contexts is explored. The data are drawn from an ESRC-funded study of children’s use of tablet apps, in which 2000 UK parents completed an online survey, and six ethnographic case studies of families with children aged under five were undertaken. The analysis draws upon Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development and Bourdieu’s notion of capital to explore how the dynamics of the everyday contexts in which the tablet use took place were shaped by multiple factors including family histories, parental expertise and children’s interests. This complex nexus means that children’s use of tablets is individually distinct, but certain patterns can be determined, which largely relate to families’ socio-economic and cultural capital.

Keywords

Bronfenbrenner tabletsTablets Restrictive Mediation Ecological systemsEcological Systems Family Case Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/M006409/1].

References

  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, ed. John G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The logic of practice. trans. Richard Nice, Cambridge: Polity Press (original work published in 1980).Google Scholar
  3. British Educational Research Association. 2011. Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1994. Ecological models of human development. In International encyclopedia of education, 2nd ed, Vol. 3, ed. Husen, T., and T.N. Postlethwaite, 1643–1647. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1995. Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development, ed. Phyllis Moen, Glen H. Elder, Jr., and Kurt Lüscher, 619–647. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 2005. The bioecological theory of human development. In Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human. ed.development, ed. Urie Bronfenbrenner, 3–15. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3–15 (Original work published 2001).Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, Urie, and Stephen J. Ceci. 1994. Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A biological model. Psychological Review 101: 568–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, Urie, and Pamela A. Morris. 2006. The bioecological model of human development. In Handbook of child psychology, Theoretical models of human development, 6th ed, vol. 1, ed. William Damon, and Richard M. Lerner, 793–828. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Burnett, Cathy, and Karen Daniels. 2015. Technology and literacy in the early years: Framing young children’s meaning-making with new technologies. In Understanding digital technologies and young children: An international perspective, ed. Susanne Garvis and Narelle Lemmon, 18–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Carrington, Victoria. 2013. An argument for assemblage theory: Integrated spaces, mobility and polycentricity. In Children’s virtual play worlds: Culture, learning and participation, ed. Ann Burke, and Jackie Marsh, 200–216. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Chaudron Stephane, M.E Beutel, Martina Černikova, Veronica Donoso Navarette, Michael Dreier, Ben Fletcher-Watson, Anni-Sofia Heikkilä, Věra Kontríková, Riitta-Liisa Korkeamäki, Sonia Livingstone, Jackie Marsh, Giovanna Mascheroni, Marina Micheli, Daniele Milesi, K. W. Müller, Tuula Myllylä-Nygård, Marja Niska, Oxana Olkina, Svenja Ottovordemgentschenfelde, Lydia Plowman, Wannes Ribbens, Janice Richardson, C. Schaack, Vladimir Shlyapnikov, David Šmahel, Galina Soldatova and Klaus Wölfling. 2015. Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239. Accessed 17 September 2016.
  13. Clark, Lynn Schofield. 2011. Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication theory 21 (4): 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, Lynn Schofield. 2013. The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, Giles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Formby, Susie. 2014. Parents’ perspectives: Children’s use of technology in the early years. London.: National Literacy Trust.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, Eugene, and Marianne McTavish. 2016. ‘i’Babies: Infants’ and toddlers’ emergent language and literacy in a digital culture of iDevices. Journal Of Early Childhood Literacy. Published online before print 15 June 2016, doi: 10.1177/1468798416653175.
  18. Holloway, Donnell, Lelia Green, and Carlie Love. 2014. ‘It’s all about the apps’: Parental mediation of pre-schoolers’ digital lives. Media International Australia 153 (November): 148–156.Google Scholar
  19. Kenner, Chamian, Mahera Ruby, John Jessel, Eve Gregory, and Tahera Arju. 2008. Intergenerational learning events around the computer: A site for linguistic and cultural exchange. Language and Education 22 (4): 298–319.Google Scholar
  20. Kucirkova, Natalia, David Messer, Kieron Sheehy and R. Rosie Flewitt. 2013. Sharing personalised stories on iPads: A close look at one parent–child interaction. Literacy 47 (3): 115–122.Google Scholar
  21. Livingstone, Sonia, and Ellen J. Helsper. 2008. Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 52 (4): 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livingstone, Sonia, Giovanna Mascheroni, Michael Dreier, Stephane Chaudron, and Kaat Lagae. 2015. How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. LSE: EU Kids Go Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63378/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_EU%20Kids%20Online_EU_Kids_Online_How%20parents%20manage%20digital%20devices_2016.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
  23. Marsh, Jackie, Greg Brooks, Jane Hughes, Louise Ritchie and Sam Roberts. 2005. Digital beginnings: Young children’s use of popular culture, media and new technologies. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield. http://www.digitalbeginnings.shef.ac.uk/DigitalBeginningsReport.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2016.
  24. Marsh, Jackie, Lydia Plowman, Dylan Yamada-Rice, C. Julia. Bishop, Jamal Lahmar, Fiona Scott, Andrew Davenport, Simon Davis, Katie French, Maddalena Piras, Sally Thornhill, Peter Robinson and Peter Winter. 2015. Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: final project report. www.techandplay.org. Accessed 17 September 2016.
  25. Marsh, Jackie, Peter Hannon, Margaret Lewis, and Louise Ritchie. 2015. Young children’s Initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research. Published online ahead of print. 18 June doi: 10.1177/1476718X15582095.
  26. Nardi, Bonnie A., and Vicki L. O’Day. 1999. Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Neumann, Michelle M., Michelle Hood, and David L. Neumann. 2009. The scaffolding of emergent literacy skills in the home environment: A case study. Early Childhood Education Journal 36 (4): 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neumann, Michelle M., and David L. Neumann. 2015. The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Published online 10 December 2015 ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ItalianpeopleTCP1468798415619773
  29. Nikken, Peter, and Jeroen Jansz. 2014. Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology 39 (2): 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ofcom. 2015. Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London: ofcom. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/research-publications/childrens/children-parents-nov-15/. Accessed 17 September 2016.
  31. O’Mara, Joanne, and Linda Laidlaw. 2011. Living in the iWorld: Two literacy researchers reflect on the changing texts and literacy practices of childhood. English Teaching: Practice and Critique 10 (4): 149–159.Google Scholar
  32. Plowman, Lydia, Christine Stephen, and Joanne McPake. 2010. Growing up with technology: Young children learning in a digital world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Rideout, Victoria J., Elizabeth A. Vandewater, and Ellen A. Wartella. 2003. Zero to six: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Washington: Kaiser Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Verenikina, Irina, and Lisa Kervin. 2011. iPads, digital play and pre-schoolers. He Kupu 2 (5): 4–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations