Advertisement

The Case of the iPad

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a critical perspective on the uptake of mobile technologies in education by interweaving personal stories with multiple theoretical perspectives. Through a series of provocations, readers are invited to consider ideas that problematize mobility and access, introduce and rework environmental concerns and question the impact of software architecture, algorithms and coding. The chapter details areas that have so far been absent from work at the intersection of literacy and technology and in so doing outlines areas that are rich with possibility for further research.

References

  1. Apple Corporation. 2015. iPad Pro: Environmental Report. http://images.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/archive/2015/iPadPro_PER_sept2015.pdf. Accessed 27 December 2016.
  2. Apple Corporation. 2016. Quarterly Report. http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2016/10/apple-reports-fourth-quarter-results.html. Accessed 4 January 2016.
  3. Australian Curriculum Assessment & Reporting Authority. 2014. Creative and Critical Thinking F-10 Curriculum. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/technologies/digital-technologies/curriculum/f-10?layout=1. Accessed 27 December 2016.
  4. Bachelard, Gaston. 1994. Trans. J.R. Stilgoe. The Poetics of Space: The Classic Look at How We Experience Intimate Places. Boston, Ma: Beacon.Google Scholar
  5. Beinaimee, Pierre. 2015. Military dolphins help defend the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear weapons. Business Insider, March 13. http://uk.businessinsider.com/the-worlds-largest-stockpile-of-nuclear-weapons-is-defended-by-dolphins-2015-3?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 27 December 2016.
  6. Brown, Wendy. 2003. Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event 7 (1) n.p.Google Scholar
  7. Burnett, C, Merchant, G. 2016. Boxes of Poison: Baroque Technique as Antidote to Simple Views of Literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(3): 258–279.Google Scholar
  8. Chikadaya, Batsirai. 2016: Apple iPads lead in a declining tablet market, here are the top 5 devices. Techzim, November 1. http://www.techzim.co.zw/2016/11/apple-ipads-lead-declining-tablet-market/#.WBh6mY_XIdV. Accessed 31 December 2016.
  9. Department for Education. 2013. National Curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study. Accessed 27 December 2016.
  10. Education Scotland. 2014. Digital learning and teaching: Our vision for digital learning. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Education/Schools/ICTinLearning. Accessed 27 December 2016.
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1994. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault: Power, ed. James Faubion. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, Michel. 1997. The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. Paul Rabinow, 281–302. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs, Christian. 2010. Labor in informational capitalism and on the internet. The Information Society 26 (3): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabrys, Jennifer. 2011. Digital Rubbish: A Natural History of Electronics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gergen, Kenneth. 2003. Self and Community in the New Floating Worlds. In Mobile Democracy, Essays on Society, Self and Politics, ed. K. Nyiri, 103–114. Vienna: Passagen.Google Scholar
  16. Greenpeace. 2014. Green Gadgets: Designing the future. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/toxics/2014/Green%20Gadgets.pdf. Accessed 27 December 2016.
  17. Hall, Richard. 2013. Mobile technologies and an ethical digital literacy in the face of empire. In The Politics of Education and Technology: Conflicts, Controversies and Connections, ed. Neil Selwyn, and Keri Facer, 169–190. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harman, Graham. 2010. I am also of the opinion that materialism must be destroyed. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (5): 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodder, Ian. 2014. The entanglements of humans and things: A long-term view. New Literary History 45 (1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. How to follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Law, John, and Vicky Singleton. 2005. Object lessons. Organization 12 (3): 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leander, Kevin M., Nathan C. Phillips, and Katherine Headrick Taylor. 2010. The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education 34 (1): 329–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyon, David. 1998. The world wide web of surveillance: The internet and off-world power-flows. Information Communication & Society 1 (1): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Madden, Shannon. 2014. Obsolescence in/of digital writing studies. Computers and Composition 33: 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, John. 2001. Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Merchant, Guy. 2012. Mobile practices in everyday life: popular digital technologies and schooling revisited. British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 770–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parry, B., Burnett, C. & Merchant, G. (eds.) 2017. Literacy, media, technology: past, present and future. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  29. Ponge, Francis. 1942. Le parti pris des choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  30. Rose, Nikolas. 1999. The Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shaviro, Steven. 2011. The universe of things. Theory & Event 14: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheller, Mimi, and John Urry. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and planning A 38 (2): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thielman, Sam. 2016. Eagle-eyed: Dutch police to train birds to take down unauthorised drones. The Guardian, February 1. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/01/dutch-netherlands-police-birds-unauthorized-drones. Accessed 26 December 2016.
  35. Torres, T. 2015. Candy Crush players spent over a billion dollars on in-app purchases last year. Tech Times, February 13.Google Scholar
  36. Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Which? 2016. The best latest smartphones. Which, 58–61.Google Scholar
  38. White, Richard. 2015. Following in the footsteps of Elisee Reclus: Disturbing places of inter-species violence that are hidden in plain sight. In Anarchism and Animal Liberation: Essays on Complementary Elements of Total Liberation, ed. Anthony Nocella, Richard White, and Erica Cudworth, 212–230. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wolch, Jennifer and Emel, Jacques. 1995. Editorial: Bringing the animals back in. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13 (5): 632–636.Google Scholar
  40. Young, Kenneth. 2016. Biogeography of the anthropocene. Progress in Physical Geography 40 (1): 161–174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations