Advertisement

Hands, Fingers and iPads

Chapter

Abstract

New touchscreen technologies have drawn attention to the materiality of literate behaviour. Reflecting on the concept of handiness, this chapter looks at meaning making as a kind of ‘engaged material consciousness’ (Sennett 2009) that depends upon but always exceeds the complex coordinations of hand and eye. Interrogating empirical materials gathered in a study of iPads in the early years, it shows young children and the adults that care for them engaged in complex negotiations and interactions that continually remake literacy, technology and learning.

References

  1. Apple Inc. 2016. iPad mini 4. http://www.apple.com/uk/ipad-mini-4/. Accessed August, 8 2016.
  2. Brandt, Deborah. 2015. The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CSAD [Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents]. 2003. Vindolanda Tablets Online. http://vindolanda.csad.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed August, 8 2016.
  4. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, Jane. 2001. The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Board of Education. 1937. Handbook of suggestions: For the consideration of teachers and others concerned in the work of public elementary schools. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  7. Burnett, Cathy, and Guy Merchant. 2014. Points of view: Reconceptualising literacies through an exploration of adult and child interactions in a virtual world. Journal of Research in Reading 37 (1): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnett, Cathy, and Guy Merchant. 2016. Boxes of poison: Baroque technique as antidote to simple views of literacy. Journal of Literacy Research 48 (3): 258–279.Google Scholar
  9. Crescenzi, Lucrezia, Cary Jewitt, and Sarah Price. 2014. The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37 (2): 86–95.Google Scholar
  10. Lenz-Taguchi, Hilevi. 2010. Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, Roy. 2001. Rethinking writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Kuby, Candace, Tara Rucker, and Jessica Kirchhofer. 2015. ‘Go Be a Writer’: Intra-activity with materials, time and space in literacy learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 15 (3): 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kucirkova, Natalia, David Messer, and Denise Whitelock. 2013. Parents reading with their toddlers: The role of personalization in book engagement. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 13 (4): 445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamarre, Thomas. 2002. Diagram, Inscription, Sensation. In A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari, ed. Brian Massumi, 149–170. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Law, John. 2004. After method: Mess in social science research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lynch, Julianne, and Terri Redpath. 2012. ‘Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: A meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 14 (2): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mackey, Margaret. 2016a. Literacy as material engagement; the abstract, tangible and mundane ingredients of childhood reading. Literacy 50 (3): 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mackey, Margaret. 2016b. One child reading: My auto-bibliography. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
  19. MacLure, Maggie, Rachael Holmes, Christina Macrae, and Liz Jones. 2010. Animating classroom ethnography: Overcoming video-fear. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5): 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh, Jackie, Lydia Plowman, Dylan Yamada-Rice, Julia Bishop, Jamal Lahmar, and Fiona, Scott. 2015. Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: Final project report. www.techandplay.org. Accessed August, 8 2016.
  21. Merchant, Guy. 2014. Keep taking the tablets: iPads, story apps and early literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 38 (1): 3–11.Google Scholar
  22. Merchant, Guy. 2015. Apps, adults and young children: Researching digital literacy practices in context. In Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age, ed. Rodney Jones, Alice Chik, and Christof Hafner, 144–158. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2014. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. D. Landes Abingdon.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Norris, Sigrid. 2012. Three hierarchical positions of deictic gesture in relation to spoken language: A multimodal interaction analysis. Visual Communication 10 (2): 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Potter, John, and Theo Bryer. 2017. Finger flowment and moving image language; learning and filmmaking with tablet devices. In Literacy, media, technology: Past, present and future, ed. Rebecca Parry, and Cathy Burnett, 11–127. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  26. Rowsell, Jennifer. 2014. Towards a phenomenology of contemporary reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37 (2): 117–127.Google Scholar
  27. Sennett, Richard. 2009. The Craftsman. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Siegel, Marjorie. 2016. Inscription, erasure, embodiment: Literacy research and bodies of knowledge. In Literacies, learning and the body: Putting theory and practice into pedagogical practice, ed. Grace Enriquez, Elisabeth Johnson, Stavroula Kontovourki, and Christine Mallozi, 20–35. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, Roff. 2016. Ancient IOUs found beneath Bloomberg’s new London HQ. National Geographic June 1, 2016. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/05/ancient-rome-London-Londinum-Bloomberg-archaeology-Boudicca-archaeology/. Accessed August, 8 2016.
  30. Standards and Testing Agency. 2016. 2016 Teacher assessment exemplification end of key stage two: English writing, working at the expected standard. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510832/STA-Ex2016-KS2-EW-MorganAnn_PDFA.pdf. Accessed August, 8 2016.
  31. Tallis, Raymond. 2003. The hand: A philosophical inquiry into human being. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
  32. Webb, Lesley. 1969. Modern practice in the infant school. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Tomlin, Roger. 2004. The girl in question. Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents Newsletter 11, Winter 2004–2005: 1.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, Frank. 1998. The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language and human culture. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations