Children’s Engagement with iPads in Early Years Classrooms: Exploring Peer Cultures and Transforming Practices



Classroom resources, iPad apps included, are very often designed with clear pedagogical goals in mind. Currently, a range of apps available to schools, such as Hairy Letters © and Pocket Phonics Letter Sounds and Writing ©, are specifically designed to support skills commonly deemed important for print literacy development. This chapter draws on four video recorded episodes and focuses attention on children’s communicative repertoires as they interact with and around iPad apps, therefore providing insights into the ways in which digital technologies mediate children’s early literacy learning experiences. What becomes clear is that apps in classrooms offer sites for collaborative engagement where novel communicative repertoires can emerge. These repertoires, in some part shaped by the operational dimension and the multimodal affordances of the touchscreen device, quickly become integrated into children’s playful activity. Such activity, as children’s interests emerge and are played out, stimulates participation and gives rise to children’s peer cultures. When seen in this way, it becomes apparent that while apps may support elements of print literacies, the role of apps in children’s early learning experiences goes far beyond specific pedagogical goals.


  1. Burnett, Cathy. 2010. Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 10 (3): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burnett, Cathy. 2014. Investigating pupils’ interactions around digital texts: A spatial perspective on the ‘classroom-ness’ of digital literacy practices in schools. Educational Review 66 (2): 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bomer, Randy. 2003. Things that make kids smart: A Vygotskian perspective on concrete tool use in primary literacy classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 3 (3): 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corsaro, William. 2005. The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daniels, Karen. 2014. Cultural agents creating Texts: A collaborative space adventure’. Literacy 48 (2): 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniels, Karen. 2016. Exploring enabling literacy environments: Young children’s spatial and material encounters in early years classrooms. English in Education 50 (1): 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniels, Karen. 2017. Young children in an education context: Apps, cultural agency and expanding communicative repertoires. In Apps, Technology and Young Learners, ed. Garry Falloon, and Natalia Kucirkova, 280–290. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. DFE. 2013. National curriculum in England: English programmes of study. Accessed December 2016.
  9. DFE. 2014. Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. Setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five. Accessed December 2016.
  10. Dyson, Anne Haas. 2003. Welcome to the Jam: Popular culture, school literacy, and the making of childhoods. Harvard Educational Review 73: 328–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyson, Anne Haas. 2008. The Pine Cone wars: Studying writing in a community of children. Language Arts 85 (4): 305–315.Google Scholar
  12. Flewitt, Rosie. 2005. Conducting research with young children: Some ethical considerations. Early Child Development and Care 175 (6): 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kress, Gunther. 1997. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kucirkova, Natalia, David Messer, Kieran Sheehy, and Rosie Flewitt. 2014. Parent-child narrative accompanying a personalized iPad story. Literacy 47 (3): 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levy, Rachael. 2009. You have to understand words… but not read them’, young children becoming readers in a digital age. Journal of Research in Reading 32 (1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, Jackie, Lydia Plowman, Dylan Yamada-Rice, Julia Bishop, Jamal Lahmar, Fiona Scott, Andrew Davenport, Simon Davis, Katie French, Maddalena Piras, Sally Thornhill, Peter Robinson and Peter Winter. 2015. Exploring Play and Creativity in Pre-Schoolers’ Use of Apps: Final Project Report. Accessed December 15, 2016.
  19. Merchant, Guy. 2012. Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital literacies and schools revisited. British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 770–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merchant, Guy. 2014. Keep taking the tablets, iPads, story apps and early literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 38 (1): 3–11.Google Scholar
  21. Moll, Luis, C., Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice 31 (2): 132–141.Google Scholar
  22. Norris, Sigrid. 2011. The hierarchical positions of deictic gesture I relation to spoken language: A multimodal interaction analysis. Visual Communication 10 (2): 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rowe, Deborah Wells. 2003. The nature of young children’s authoring. In Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy, ed. Nigel Hall, Joanne Larson, and Jackie Marsh, 258–270. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Street, Brian. 1995. Social Literacies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  25. Street, Brian. 2003. What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice in Current Issues in Comparative Education 5 (2): 77–91.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, Roberta. 2014. Meaning between, in and around words, gestures and postures—Multimodal meaning-making in children’s classroom discourse. Language and Education 28 (5): 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walsh, Maureen and Alyson Simpson. 2014. Exploring literacies through touch pad technologies: The dynamic materiality of modal interactions. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37(2): 96–105.Google Scholar
  28. Wohlwend, Karen. 2015. Making, remaking and reimagining the everyday: Play, creativity and popular media. In Routledge handbook of Literacy Studies, ed. Jennifer Rowsell, and Kate Pahl, 548–560. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Wolfe, Sylvia, and Rosie Flewitt. 2010. New technologies new multimodal literacy practices and young children’s metacognitive development. Cambridge journal of education 40 (4): 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations