Advertisement

The Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Blood Pressure Control and Implications for Vietnam

  • Thinh Phuc Nguyen
  • Thanh-An Nguyen-Le
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 63)

Abstract

Telemedicine has been applied in disease management in many countries for a few decades. It allows delivery of medical care at a distance and helps patients to get access to medical expertise that may not be available at the patients’ site; thus, it has great potential in bringing profound impact on developing countries where there is usually shortage of healthcare workforce and inadequate healthcare infrastructure. With the increase in Internet access and the trend of developing Internet of Things (IoT), Vietnam seems to have the infrastructure-ready for the application of telemedicine as one solution for the overcrowded healthcare system. The objective of this paper is to review the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine interventions especially in blood pressure control as hypertension is one of the prioritized issues in Vietnam public health system. Lessons learned from such interventions will be important for the first adoption of telemedicine in Vietnam.

Keywords

Hypertension Telemedicine Tele-blood pressure monitoring Cost-effectiveness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by International University—VNUHCM under grant number T2016-07-BME.

References

  1. 1.
    Trichili H, Dhibi M, Solaiman B (2008) Telemedicine in developing countries: case of Tunisia. In 2008 3rd international conference on information and communication technologies: from theory to applications ICTTAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edworthy SM (2001) Telemedicine in developing countries. BMJ 323(7312):524–525Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tuan TM (2011) Broadband in vietnam: forging its own path: 1–29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, Fishman PA, Catz SL, Carlson J, Carrell D, Tyll L, Larson EB, Thompson RS (2008) Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299(24):2857–2867Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Margolis KL, Kerby TJ, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Maciosek MV, O’Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM (2012) Design and rationale for home blood pressure telemonitoring and case management to control hypertension (HyperLink): a cluster randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 33(4):794–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    AbuDagga A, Resnick HE, Alwan M (2010) Impact of blood pressure telemonitoring on hypertension outcomes: a literature review. Telemed J E Health 16(7):830–838Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Logan AG, Jane Irvine M, McIsaac WJ, Tisler A, Rossos PG, Easty A, Feig DS, Cafazzo JA (2012) Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring with self-care support on uncontrolled systolic hypertension in diabetics. Hypertens 60(1):51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wakefield BJ, Holman JE, Ray A, Scherubel M, Adams MR, Hillis SL, Rosenthal GE (2011) Effectiveness of home telehealth in comorbid diabetes and hypertension: a randomized, controlled trial. Telemed e-Health 17(4):254–261Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJW, Light RP (2011) Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens 57(1):29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omboni S, Guarda A (2011) Impact of home blood pressure telemonitoring and blood pressure control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Am J Hypertens 24(9):989–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Purcell R, McInnes S, Halcomb EJ (2014) Telemonitoring can assist in managing cardiovascular disease in primary care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Fam Pract 15(1):43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inglis SC, Clark RA, McAlister FA, Stewart S, Cleland JGF (2011) Which components of heart failure programmes are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of structured telephone support or telemonitoring as the primary component of chronic heart failure management in 8323 patients: Abridged Coc. Eur J Heart Fail 13(9):1028–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Louis AA, Turner T, Gretton M, Baksh A, Cleland JGF (2003) A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 5(5):583–590Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark RA, Inglis SC, McAlister FA, Cleland JGF, Stewart S (2007) Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334(942)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giamouzis G, Mastrogiannis D, Koutrakis K, Karayannis G, Parisis C, Rountas C, Adreanides E, Dafoulas GE, Stafylas PC, Skoularigis J, Giacomelli S, Olivari Z, Triposkiadis F (2012) Telemonitoring in chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Cardiol Res Pract 1(1)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chaudhry SI, Phillips CO, Stewart SS, Riegel B, Mattera JA, Jerant AF, Krumholz HM (2007) Telemonitoring for patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. J Card Fail 13(1):56–62Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merriel SWD, Andrews V, Salisbury C (2014) Telehealth interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med (Baltim) 64:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Gabutti G, Raisaro A, Curti M, Regoli F, Auricchio A (2011) Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 13(4):450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zullig LL, Dee Melnyk S, Goldstein K, Shaw RJ, Bosworth HB (2013) The role of home blood pressure telemonitoring in managing hypertensive populations. Curr Hypertens Rep 15(4):346–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bradford WD, Kleit A, Krousel-Wood MA, Re RM (2005) Comparing willingness to pay for telemedicine across a chronic heart failure and hypertension population. Telemed J E Health 11(4):430–438Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seto E (2008) Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemed e-Health 14(7):679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noel HC, Vogel DC, Erdos JJ, Cornwall D, Levin F (2004) Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. Telemed J E Health 10(2):170–183Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bove AA, Homko CJ, Santamore WP, Kashem M, Kerper M, Elliott DJ (2013) Managing hypertension in urban underserved subjects using telemedicine—a clinical trial. Am Heart J 165(4):615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grabowski DC, O’Malley AJ (2014) The care span: use of telemedicine can reduce hospitalizations of nursing home residents and generate savings for medicare. Health Aff 33(2):244–250Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bobrie G, Postel-Vinay N, Delonca J, Corvol P (2007) Self-measurement and self-titration in hypertension. a pilot telemedicine study. Am J Hypertens 20(12):1314–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Artinian NT, Washington OGM, Templin TN (2001) Effects of home telemonitoring and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban african americans: a pilot study. Hear Lung J Acute Crit Care 30(3):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Green BB, Anderson ML, Ralston JD, Catz S, Fishman PA, Cook AJ (2011) Patient ability and willingness to participate in a web-based intervention to improve hypertension control. J Med Internet Res 13(1):e1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringInternational University—Vietnam National University HCMCHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations