Advertisement

Comparative Study and Yield Productivity of Nano-paint and Nano-fluid Used in a Passive-Type Single Basin Solar Still

  • Amrit Kumar Thakur
  • Deepak Agarwal
  • Prashant Khandelwal
  • Saty Dev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 435)

Abstract

Water is necessary for all living beings. It is particular the most important factor for the sustenance of mankind. More than 66% of the earth is covered with water in which 97% of available water from various sources stands brackish which includes some harmful microbes, and 2% water is frozen in the form of icy masses and freezing tops. Solar still (SS) is a device used to convert brackish water into distilled water, but it has very limited productivity which is the major concern. To improve the yield of simple solar still (SS) in this work, black paint is mixed with Al2O3 + water to make it nano-paint and it is coated outside the glass cover of solar still. Al2O3 can be placed inside water sink to increase the vaporization rate, and due to this, yield productivity increases. Experiments were conducted from 25 June to 27 June for common depth of 0.01 m for simple solar still and nano-fluid in water basin of solar still and nano-paint with nano-fluid both combined for SS in climatic conditions of Jaipur, India. The theoretical performance of the passive solar still and nano-paint and nano-fluid in solar still is compared with effectiveness and yield productivity. Simple solar still gives the water output of 4.47 L for 0.01 m water depth whereas simple SS with Nano fluid give output of give output of 5.25 L and SS with Nano fluid in water basin and Nano paint on glass cover of SS give yield of 5.56 L for all three cases for same water depth.

Keywords

Nano-paint Nano-fluid Solar still Evaporation Effectiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Tabrizi, F.F., Dashtban, M., Moghaddam, H., Razzaghi, K.: Effect of water flow rate on internal heat and mass transfer and daily productivity of a weir-type cascade solar still. Desalination 260, 239–247 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rufuss, D.D.W., Iniyan, S., Suganthi, L., Davies, P.A.: Solar stills: a comprehensive review of designs, performance and material advances. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 63, 464–496 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seddegh, S., Wang, X., Henderson, A.D., Xing, Z.: Solar domestic hot water systems using latent heat energy storage medium: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 517–533 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gugulothua, R., Somanchia, N.S., Sri Rama Devi, R., Banoth, H.B.: Experimental investigations on performance evaluation of a single basin solar still using different energy absorbing materials. Aquat. Procedia 4, 1483–1491 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Velmurugan, V., Gopalakrishnan, M., Raghu, R., Srithar, K.: Single basin solar still with fin for enhancing productivity. Energy Convers. Manag. 49, 2602–2608 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dev, R., Tiwari, G.N.: Characteristic equation of a passive solar still. Desalination 245, 246–265 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uma Maheswari, C., Vinodh Reddy, B., NavyaSree, A., Vishnuvardhan Reddy, A., Siva Prasad Reddy, A., Raghu Ram Prasad, C., Harish Kumar Varma, B.: CFD analysis of single basin double slope solar still. Invent. J. Res. Technol. Eng. Manag. 1, 1–5 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jamar, A., Majid, Z.A.A., Azmi, W.H., Norhafana, M., Razak, A.A.: A review of water heating system for solar energy applications. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 280, 320–330 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaviti, A.K., Yadav, A., Shukla, A.: Inclined solar still designs: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54, 429–451 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panchal, H.N., Shah, P.K.: Char performance analysis of different energy absorbing plates on solar stills. Iranica J. Energy Environ. 2, 297–301 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badran, O.O.: Experimental study of the enhancement parameters on a single slope solar still productivity. Desalination 209(1), 136–143 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asbik, M., Ansari, O., Bah, A., Zari, N., Mimet, A., El-Ghetany, H.: Exergy analysis of solar desalination still combined with heat storage system using phase change material (PCM). Desalination 381, 26–37 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gugulothua, R., Somanchia, N.S., Sri Rama Devi, R., Banothc, H.B.: Experimental investigations on performance evaluation of a single basin solar still using different energy absorbing materials. Aquat. Procedia 4, 1483–1491 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mousa, H., Gujarathi, A.M.: Modeling and analysis the productivity of solar desalination units with phase change materials. Renew. Energy 95, 225–232 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amrit Kumar Thakur
    • 1
  • Deepak Agarwal
    • 2
  • Prashant Khandelwal
    • 3
  • Saty Dev
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Automobile EngineeringArya College of Engineering and ITKukas, JaipurIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentApex Institute of Engineering and TechnologyJaipurIndia
  3. 3.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentArya College of Engineering and ITJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations