Abstract
Integration into the global value chain is an important condition for the development of many countries. According to some researches, the level of integration of Russia into the global value chain remains at a low level. The purpose of this chapter is the identification of research fronts in the field of the global value chain on the basis of foreign experience and the identification of opportunities for their practical use for the development of the Russian economy. Web of Science was used as an information base. We used specific methods for the determination of research fronts that include (a) Google maps for visualization of the connections of collaboration between scientists and (b) Cite Space for the definition and visualization of research fronts. Research fronts were detected and possibilities of their practical use for Russian economy were identified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carillo, M. R., Papagni, E., Sapio, A. (2013, December). Do collaborations enhance the high-quality output of scientific institutions? Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercise. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 47: 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.005
Chen, C. 2015. CiteSpace. http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/download.html.
Filimonova, N., & Morgunova N. V. (2014, April). Project management as a mechanism of maximizing efficiency in planning and implementation of programmes of regional development. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2421156.
Glazev, S. U. 2013. A scientific report: On the goals, issues, and measures of government development policy and integration. http://www.glazev.ru/scienexpert/305/.
Guerrero, D., Martínez-Almela J., Yagüe, J. L., La Rosa, G., Girón, C., Zatán, K. (2014, March). Approximation to the study of scientific production of AEIPRO’s international congresses in engineering and Project Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 119, 796–804. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.089.
Gureyev, V., & Mazov, N. 2013. Bibliometric methods in development of scientific organization rating. Digital libraries: Advanced methods and technologies, Digital Collections: XV All-Russia. scientific. Conf. RCDL-2013: 14–17.
Hart, R. L. (2000). Collaborative publication by university librarians: An exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(2), 94–99. doi:10.1016/S0099-1333(99)00145-7.
Higher School of Economics. (2012). An analytical report for the results of completing stage one of research activity on “Actualizing a long-term rorecast of the most important trends in scientific and technical development for the period of up to 2030.” http://www.hse.ru/data/2012/03/05/1266648658/Докла_ВШЭ_актуализация%20прогноза.pdf.
Jahangirian, M., Eldabi, T., Garg, L., Jun, G. T., Naseer, A., Patel, B., Stergioulas, L., & Young, T. (2011). A rapid review method for extremely large corpora of literature: Applications to the domains of modelling, simulation, and management. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 234–243. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.004.
Kotsemir, M. (2012). Dynamics of Russian and world science through the prism of international publications. Foresight Russia, 6(1), 38–59.
OECD. (2013). OECD-WTO Trade in Value Added (TiVA): Value added in gross exports by source country and source industry. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diae2013d1_en.pdf.
Rigby, J., & Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34(6), 784–794. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.004.
Thomson Reuters. (2013). Research Fronts 2013. 100 Top-Ranked specialties in the sciences and social sciences. http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/research-fronts-2013.pdf.
Thomson Reuters. (2014). Research Fronts 2013. 100 Top-Ranked specialties in the sciences and social sciences. http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/research-fronts-2014.pdf.
UNCTAD. (2013a). Global value chains and development: Investment and trade for development. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diae2013d1_en.pdf
UNCTAD. (2013b). World Investment Report 2013. Global value chains: investment and trade for development. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2013_en.pdf
Yanhua, Z., Song, H., Lin, H., & Beibei, N. (2011). Global environmental impact assessment research trends (1973–2009). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11, 1499–1507. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.226.
Yanhua, Z., Thuminh, N., Beibei, N., Shao ei, & Song, H. (2012). Research trends in non point source during 1975-2010. Physics Procedia, 33, 138–143. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Filimonova, N.M., Fedosova, R.N., Kheifits, B.I. (2017). Research Trends in Global Value Chain: Possibility of Practical Use for the Russian Economy in Terms of Innovative Development. In: Gaol, F., Hutagalung, F. (eds) Social Interactions and Networking in Cyber Society. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4190-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4190-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4189-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4190-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)