Skip to main content

Differences in temporal gait parameters between multiple sclerosis and healthy people

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CMBEBIH 2017

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes severe gait problems and there are limited studies to quantitatively identify the specific gait parameters that are affected. The aim of the current study was to characterize the temporal gait parameters in MS patients and ascribe them to clinical variables, in order to enable target-oriented management. A total of 14 MS patients and 11 healthy controls (CO) were evaluated clinically by expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and quantitatively by the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW) using non-invasive wireless inertial sensors. The self-selected walking velocity was used as a covariate in the analysis to ensure that group differences were not due to differences in walking velocity between the MS and CO groups. Reduced step time and cadence were seen in patients with MS. We also found significant correlations between biomechanical gait parameters and EDSS score, which provides a clinical rating of disease severity. Temporal gait variability noted as associated to slower walk in MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dingwell JB, Cavanagh PR. Increased variability of continuous overground walking in neuropathic patients is only indirectly related to sensory loss. Gait Posture. 2001;14:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodkin DE, Cookfair D, Wende K, Bourdette D, Pullicino P, Scherokman B, et al. Inter-and intrarater scoring agreement using grades 1.0–3.5 of the Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1992;42(April (4)):859–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, et al. Placebocontrolled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367(September (12)):1098–107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hausdorff JM, Edelberg HK, Mitchell SL, Goldberger AL, Wei JY. Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huisinga, Jessie M.; Schmid, Kendra K.; Filipi, Mary; and Stergiou, Nicholas, “Gait Mechanics are Different between Healthy Controls and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis” (2013). Journal Articles. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/biomechanicsarticles/7

  6. Monticone, M., et al. 2014. Reliability of spatial-temporal gait parameters during dual-task interference in people with multiple sclerosis. A cross-sectional study, Gait & Posture 40(4): 715–718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.015

  7. Kalron, A. 2016. Gait variability across the disability spectrum in people with multiple sclerosis, Journal of Neurological Sciences 361: 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.12.012

  8. M Kaufman, D Moyer, J Norton. The significant change for the Timed 25-Foot Walk in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite. Mult Scler August 2000 vol. 6 no. 4 286-290.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kotiadis, D.; Hermens, H. J.; Veltink, P. H. 2010. Inertial gait phase detection for control of a drop foot stimulator inertial sensing for gait phase detection, Medical Engineering & Physics 32(4): 287– 297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.014

  10. Roman Schniepp, Maximilian Wuehr, Maximilian Neuhaeusser, Maria Kamenova. Locomotion Speed Determines Gait Variability in Cerebellar Ataxia and Vestibular Failure. Movement Disorders, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2012. 125-131.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Konstantin Dimitriadis, MD,1 Thomas Klopstock, MD,1 M. Strupp, MD,1,2 Thomas Brandt, MD, FRCP,2,4 and Klaus Jahn, MD1,2

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rebecca I. Spain, Martina Mancini, Fay B. Horak, Dennis Bourdette. Body-worn sensors capture variability, but not decline, of gait and balance measures in multiple sclerosis over 18 months. Gait & Posture 39 (2014) 958–964.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rueterbories, J., et al. 2010. Methods for gait event detection and analysis in ambulatory systems, Medical Engineering & Physics 32(6): 545–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.03.007

  14. Pilutti, L. A., et al. 2013. Gait and six-minute walk performance in persons with multiple sclerosis, Journal of Neurological Sciences 334(1–2): 72–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.2511

  15. Barry, R. G., et al. 2010. An adaptive gyroscope-based algorithm for temporal gait analysis. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 48: 1251-1260. DOI 10.1007/s11517-010-0692-0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julius Griškevičius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daunoravičienė, K. et al. (2017). Differences in temporal gait parameters between multiple sclerosis and healthy people. In: Badnjevic, A. (eds) CMBEBIH 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 62. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4165-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4166-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics