Advertisement

Reflections on Critical Engagement

Chapter

Abstract

Quan concludes the book by summarizing the main findings of his analysis and some potential contributions to the Weberian tradition. He first distinguishes the character of the Chinese version of governance in comparison with some popular models of governance in the recent global trends of government reform. Then, he takes stock of all theoretical issues to reflect their significance for the possible updating of the Weberian tradition. This is a legitimate and promising question, since it is the original requirement of the methodology of ideal types, proposed by Weber himself. Finally, he suggests a potential research agenda for pursuing a contextual theory of governance in the context of Chinese transitional politics. This valuable task allows us to imagine the future of governance ideas with reference to deepening neoliberalization in China.

Bibliography

  1. Barzelay, Michael. 1992. Breaking through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cardona, Francisco. 2000. “Scope of Civil Services in European Countries: Trends and Developments.” OECD: Paris. Retrieved 27(02).Google Scholar
  3. Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2005a. “The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management.” Post-Autistic Economic Review 33(14): 17–28.Google Scholar
  4. Dunleavy, Patrick, and Christopher Hood 1994. “From Old Public Administration to New Public Management.” Public Money & Management 14(3): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giddens, Anthony. 1995. Politics, Sociology and Social Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Harrison, Graham. 2004. The World Bank and Africa: The Construction of Governance States. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hesse, Joachim. 1997. “Rebuilding the State: Public Sector Reform in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems, edited by Jan-Erik Lane, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Hughes, Owen. 2003. Public Management and Administration: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  9. Lam, Wo-lap. 2015. Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping: Renaissance, Reform, or Retrogression?. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Lynn, Laurence. 2001. “The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood for.” Public Administration Review 61(2): 144–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olsen, Johan. 2008. “The Ups and Downs of Bureaucratic Organization.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 13–37.Google Scholar
  12. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  13. Osborne, David, and Peter Plastrik 1999. Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Peters, Michael. 2001b. Poststructuralism, Marxism, and Neoliberalism: Between Theory and Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  15. Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert 2011. Public Management Reform: A comparative Analysis—New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Quah, Jon. 2015. “Hunting the Corrupt ‘Tigers’ and ‘Flies’ in China: An Evaluation of Xi Jinping’s Anti-Corruption Campaign.” Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies 2015. 1.Google Scholar
  17. Randma-Liv, Tiina. 2008. “New Public Managers Versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1(2): 69–81.Google Scholar
  18. Rhodes, Roderick. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Bristol: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rhodes, Roderick. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years on.” Organization Studies 28: 1243–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Verheijen, Tony, and Alexander Kotchegura eds. 1999. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited and translated by E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Weber, Max. 1961. General Economic History, translated by Frank H. Knight. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  23. World Bank. 1997. The State in A Changing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Zeitlin, Irving. 1968. Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Barzelay, Michael. 2001. The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2005b. “The Re-Emergence of ‘Weberian’ Public Administration after the Fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European Perspective.” Trames 6: 94–108.Google Scholar
  27. Aucoin, Peter. 1990. “Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums.” Governance 3(2): 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xinhua News Agency. 2016. “Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Guomin Jingjihe Shehui Fazhan Dishisange Wunian Guihua Gangyao [The Thirteenth Five-Year Plan of National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China].” Retrieved 4 June, 2016, from http://sh.xinhuanet.com/2016-03/18/c_135200400.htm

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quan Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations