Advertisement

The Relationship Between Open Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Business Model

  • JinHyo Joseph Yun
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

This chapter looks into the relationship among open innovation (OI), entrepreneurship, and introduction of a new business model (BM) based on case studies of information technology firms in Daegu and Seoul in Korea and in Indonesia. From this, we develop a perspective about the relationship between open innovation and in two different contexts: between different regional innovation systems (RISs) and different national innovation systems (NISs).

Keywords

Open innovation Entrepreneurship New business model National innovation system Regional innovation system 

References

  1. Batheld H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Cluster and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28:31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooke R (2005) Regional knowledge capabilities and open innovation: regional innovation systems and clusters in the asymmetric knowledge economy. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks, and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–112Google Scholar
  3. Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Manag 36(3):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Harryson S (2008) Entrepreneurship through relationships—navigating from creativity to commercialisation. R&D Manag 38(3):290–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayek FA (1978) Competition as a discovery procedure. In: Hayek FA (ed) New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. Routledge, London, pp 179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux. Res Policy 35(7):935–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hornaday RW (1992) Thinking about entrepreneurship: a fuzzy set approach. J Small Bus Manag 30(4):12–23Google Scholar
  9. Kim J-h, Jung S-h (2015) Study on CEO characteristics for management of public art performance centers. J Open Innov Technol Market Complex 1(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer J-P, Diez J (2011) Catching the local buzz by embedding? Empirical insights on the regional embeddedness of multinational enterprises in Germany and the UK. Reg Stud 15(2):1–15Google Scholar
  11. Kramer J-P, Marinelli E, Iammarino S, Diez J (2011) Intangible assets as drivers of innovation: empirical evidence on multinational enterprises in German and UK regional systems of innovation. Technovation 31:447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27(2):131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lecocq X, Demil B (2006) Strategizing industry structure: the case of open systems in a low-tech industry. Strateg Manag J 27(9):891–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Y, Zhao Y, Tan J, Liu Y (2008) Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: evidence from Chinese small firms. J Small Bus Manag 46(1):113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lundvall B-A (1992) National system of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Malmberg A (2003) Beyond the cluster-local milieus and global connections. In: Peck J, Weung W (eds) Remaking the global economy: economic-geographical perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 256–275Google Scholar
  17. Marceau J (1994) Clusters, chains and complexities: three approaches to innovation with a public policy perspective. In: Dogson M, Rothwell R (eds) The handbook of industrial innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenhan, pp 145–171Google Scholar
  18. Massa S, Testa S (2008) Innovation and SMEs: misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers. Technovation 28:393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parida V, Westerberg M, Frishammar J (2012) Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance. J Small Bus Manag 50(2):283–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phelps E, Zoega G (2009) Entrepreneurship, culture and openness. In: Audretsch DB, Litan R, Strom R (eds) Entrepreneurship and openness: theory and evidence. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 101–121Google Scholar
  21. Saxenian A, Hsu J-Y (2005) The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks, and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 230–255Google Scholar
  22. Silvestre BD, Dalcol PR (2009) Geographical proximity and innovation: evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration. Technovation 29:546–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Varande VV, Jong JP, Vanhaverbeke W, Rochemont MD (2008) Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation 29:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yong SS, Park KD (2010) The role of demand heterogeneity in product innovation strategy. Korean Soc Sci J 37(2):27–42Google Scholar
  25. Yun JJ, Mohan AV (2012) Exploring open innovation approaches adopted by small and medium firms in emerging/growth industries: case studies from Daegu-Gyeongbuk region of South Korea. Int J Technol Policy Manage 12(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yun JJ, Park S, Lim D, Hahm S (2010) Emergence of east Asian TFT-LCD clusters: a comparative analysis of the Samsung cluster in South Korea and the Chimei cluster in Taiwan. Asian J Technol Innov 18(1):201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yun JHJ, Nadhiroh IM, Jung WY (2013) The relationship between open innovation, entrepreneurship, and introduction of new business models in Korean and Indonesian information technology enterprises. Korean Soc Sci J 40(2):81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeng S, Xie X, Tam C (2009) Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation 30:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • JinHyo Joseph Yun
    • 1
  1. 1.Tenured Researcher of DGIST and Professor of Open Innovation Academy of SOItmCDaeguKorea, Republic of (South Korea)

Personalised recommendations