Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Open Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Business Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Model Design Compass

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

This chapter looks into the relationship among open innovation (OI), entrepreneurship, and introduction of a new business model (BM) based on case studies of information technology firms in Daegu and Seoul in Korea and in Indonesia. From this, we develop a perspective about the relationship between open innovation and in two different contexts: between different regional innovation systems (RISs) and different national innovation systems (NISs).

This chapter is mainly based on the following paper. More than 30% of the paper was changed at this paper. Please read the full paper for the understanding of this chapter totally.

Yun J.H.J, Nadhiroh I.M, Jung W.Y (2013), The relationship between open innovation, entrepreneurship, and introduction of new business models in Korean and Indonesian information technology enterprises. Korean Social Science Journal. Vol. 40, No. 2, pp 81–99.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Batheld H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Cluster and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28:31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke R (2005) Regional knowledge capabilities and open innovation: regional innovation systems and clusters in the asymmetric knowledge economy. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks, and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Manag 36(3):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harryson S (2008) Entrepreneurship through relationships—navigating from creativity to commercialisation. R&D Manag 38(3):290–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1978) Competition as a discovery procedure. In: Hayek FA (ed) New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. Routledge, London, pp 179–190

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux. Res Policy 35(7):935–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornaday RW (1992) Thinking about entrepreneurship: a fuzzy set approach. J Small Bus Manag 30(4):12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-h, Jung S-h (2015) Study on CEO characteristics for management of public art performance centers. J Open Innov Technol Market Complex 1(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer J-P, Diez J (2011) Catching the local buzz by embedding? Empirical insights on the regional embeddedness of multinational enterprises in Germany and the UK. Reg Stud 15(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer J-P, Marinelli E, Iammarino S, Diez J (2011) Intangible assets as drivers of innovation: empirical evidence on multinational enterprises in German and UK regional systems of innovation. Technovation 31:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq X, Demil B (2006) Strategizing industry structure: the case of open systems in a low-tech industry. Strateg Manag J 27(9):891–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhao Y, Tan J, Liu Y (2008) Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: evidence from Chinese small firms. J Small Bus Manag 46(1):113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-A (1992) National system of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg A (2003) Beyond the cluster-local milieus and global connections. In: Peck J, Weung W (eds) Remaking the global economy: economic-geographical perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 256–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau J (1994) Clusters, chains and complexities: three approaches to innovation with a public policy perspective. In: Dogson M, Rothwell R (eds) The handbook of industrial innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenhan, pp 145–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Massa S, Testa S (2008) Innovation and SMEs: misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers. Technovation 28:393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parida V, Westerberg M, Frishammar J (2012) Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance. J Small Bus Manag 50(2):283–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps E, Zoega G (2009) Entrepreneurship, culture and openness. In: Audretsch DB, Litan R, Strom R (eds) Entrepreneurship and openness: theory and evidence. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 101–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A, Hsu J-Y (2005) The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks, and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 230–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre BD, Dalcol PR (2009) Geographical proximity and innovation: evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration. Technovation 29:546–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varande VV, Jong JP, Vanhaverbeke W, Rochemont MD (2008) Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation 29:423–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong SS, Park KD (2010) The role of demand heterogeneity in product innovation strategy. Korean Soc Sci J 37(2):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun JJ, Mohan AV (2012) Exploring open innovation approaches adopted by small and medium firms in emerging/growth industries: case studies from Daegu-Gyeongbuk region of South Korea. Int J Technol Policy Manage 12(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun JJ, Park S, Lim D, Hahm S (2010) Emergence of east Asian TFT-LCD clusters: a comparative analysis of the Samsung cluster in South Korea and the Chimei cluster in Taiwan. Asian J Technol Innov 18(1):201–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun JHJ, Nadhiroh IM, Jung WY (2013) The relationship between open innovation, entrepreneurship, and introduction of new business models in Korean and Indonesian information technology enterprises. Korean Soc Sci J 40(2):81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng S, Xie X, Tam C (2009) Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation 30:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yun, J.J. (2017). The Relationship Between Open Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Business Model. In: Business Model Design Compass. Management for Professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4128-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics